etcd runs a LOT more goroutines during server startup. Fix a
goroutine/for loop bug causing us to run four 7-node clusters
instead of 1/3/4/7-node clusters, also have the test/cluster
code reduce import workers. We can't do much about the spamminess
of the Raft stuff, but this should tone it down some.
This changes Count(Precall()) operations to execute the precall directly inside of the count operation, bypassing the transformation to a Precomputed() call.
Eliminating the Precomputed() step causes Count(Distinct()) to work properly on negative integers.
We want to distinguish different *kinds* of GroupCounts, so we're
making the GroupCounts parent object track its type so we can keep that
correct.
Adding this to protobuf, etc, then creates some weird behaviors
because sometimes we expect []GroupCount, and sometimes we expect
*GroupCounts. This implies changes to test cases. Also, the
changes to test cases imply that some test cases are probably now
wrong; for instance, they're expecting a "sum" column, equal to zero,
when no sum was requested.
We try to make the encoder handle a []*GroupCount gotten from another
node without panicing, and avoid breaking the semantics of the existing
messages, renumbering messages or components, etc.
Since a previous version, the `.Groups` member has been privatized,
and the `.Get()` convenience accessor has been renamed `.Groups()`
and is now used consistently in a way that should reduce the risk
of nil pointers causing crashes. Also, NewGroupCounts is used in
a couple more places.
If a precomputed call returns a nil Row result somehow, that could
cause a nil pointer exception when handling the result in
handlePreCall.
In this particular case, A Distinct call on a BSI field with a filter
which returned no results could return a SignedRow{} with nil *Rows
inside of it. This only manifested if there was data in a single shard
as otherwise the reduce logic created a SignedRow with empty *Row
objects rather than nil ones. Isn't that fun?
Extra fun: the reason the filter was returning no results was not
because it was actually empty, but because of another bug where
constructing the Distinct calls to compute the aggregate of a GroupBy
doesn't take into account that the group might include an integer
field which means that the call needs to be constructed
differently. That bug is not fixed in this commit, hence the tests are
still failing, but not panicking.
the limit could get applied before "having" in some cases which could
result in results being discarded which met the having condition while
results were kept which did not, ultimately resulting in GroupBy
falsely reporting fewer results than actually existed.
Back out support for sorting on fields (only count and aggregate
supported for now).
Fix bug where default return of "true" caused sort to be unstable. (If
they are equal, Less should return false)
Fix bug where limit was being applied before sorting.
Fix bug where offset was not actually allowed to be an argument to
GroupBy (weird! guess we weren't testing that very well)
Apply "having" after calculating Count(Distinct) aggregate so that
having can apply to that.
Switch to stable sort to make testing easier.
We execute the aggregate Distinct calls after the GroupBy is complete,
and we need these to act like non-remote calls in that they forward to
all nodes, but like remote calls in that they bypass key
translation. Added a "PreTranslated" flag to the QueryRequest to
achieve this.
Discovered an issue where a nil *Row in EmbeddedData would cause a
panic in the protobuf serialization. Changed the encoding code we
control to never pass a nil *Row.
Got fed up with lack of context on errors and added wrapping to all
calls under executor.executeCall as well as a few other places.
Handled a situation where not having data on a shard for a particular
field could cause a query to error instead of just treating that
fragment as being empty. (see the switch in executeDistinctShardSet)
Stopped GroupBy from executing the Count(Distinct) aggregate on Remote
calls.
Fixed a longstanding issue where errors retrieved from remote query
calls had a garbage character at the front due to treating a protobuf
payload as an error message instead of decoding it. (see
http/client.go)
This used to be possible to hit, but I think now that Distinct on a
set field returns a *Row rather than a SignedRow it isn't an issue. (I
wasn't able to trigger it in the tests). Adding the fix anyway as it
seems safer than not.
The rest of the changes are test infrastructure to make it easy to
call GRPC queries and verify the results as CSV.
I used a "paranoia" check to find these, but then realized the check
had a ton of false positives and doing it properly wasn't going to be
straightforward. I'm leaving the paranoia stuff in unless there are
objections, because I've wanted it before and not had it.
I also removed a log line that is very verbose and I don't think helps
anyone.
This commit changes executeDistinct to return either a *Row or a
SignedRow (instead of only being able to return a SignedRow). Distinct
on a set field will return a *Row while an int field will still return
a signed row.
We then add Field and Index fields to the Row object so that we can
determine how to translate the rows IDs to keys (if needed). This adds
a lot of logic around the translation which fixes bugs where Distinct
calls would fail to get translated.
There are, I think, still issues if you were to try to join a keyed
field to a keyed index which wasn't explicitly specified as the
field's foreign index. The IDs in the field wouldn't be using the same
translation as the IDs in the index, so the query might appear to work
but give incorrect results.
add Distinct test with integer data, and because one of the records
had a null value (and was in a shard by itself), it uncovered this
issue. I added a special error type if a view or fragment is not found
when so that we can match against it and ignore it when calculating
the results for a query.
I also added an implementation within executeCount to handle the
SignedRow case, but discovered that handlePrecalls always dumps the
negative data and that will be a bigger thing to fix
the Distinct call would get precomputed correctly, but then the
executeCount would happen in the available shards context of the
index. So if the index only had records in (e.g.) shards 10,12,18,22,
and all the values of the Distinct call were in shard 0, you'd see 0
results.
The fix skips the whole map/reduce step of executeCount (which was
basically fake anyway when the argument is precomputed), and just adds
up all counts of all the precomputed segments.
This currently won't properly count Distinct values from an int field
which contains negative numbers... going to add a test and fix for
that next.
There is also still a key translation bug which is why the one test
case is commented out... fix coming for that soon as well.
