fabro/test/docs/agents/outputs/output-patterns.dot
Bryan Helmkamp 2cce052f9f Add DOT docs test suite and fix invalid DOT in docs examples
Extract all 29 full digraph workflows from docs into test/docs/ with
an extraction script, assemble 7 snippet DOTs from reference pages,
and add a runner script for validate/dry-run/haiku/full phases.

Docs fixes:
- definition-of-done: replace multi-word condition values with
  underscored equivalents (parser doesn't support spaces), make
  safe-default edges unconditional for fallback coverage
- semantic-port: make fallback edges unconditional on fetch/analyze
  nodes so validator doesn't reject all-conditional-edge nodes

All 36 DOTs pass `arc validate`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-06 14:55:56 -05:00

33 lines
1 KiB
Text

// Assembled from docs/agents/outputs.mdx snippets
// Tests output context keys and routing directives
digraph OutputPatterns {
graph [goal="Exercise output and routing patterns from the outputs docs page"]
start [shape=Mdiamond, label="Start"]
exit [shape=Msquare, label="Exit"]
// Line 25-29: Context keys from prior stages
plan [label="Plan", prompt="Create an implementation plan."]
implement [label="Implement", prompt="Implement the plan."]
// Line 68-78: Review node with routing directives
review [
label="Review",
shape=tab,
prompt="Review the implementation. If changes are needed, \
respond with: {\"preferred_next_label\": \"fix\"}. \
If everything looks good, respond with: \
{\"preferred_next_label\": \"approve\"}."
]
fix [label="Fix", prompt="Fix the issues found."]
// Wiring
start -> plan -> implement -> review
review -> fix [label="Fix"]
review -> exit [label="Approve"]
fix -> review
}