Every run is admitted by Petri, whose check lowers imports, file
references, templates and the model stylesheet, lints the workflow and
pins its models. Fabro then re-parsed the same workflow through its own
legacy pipeline (parse, transforms, structural validation) only to fill
`RunSpec.graph` for the read side. That second pass is gone: the run's
display graph is `fabro_types::RunGraph`, built once in `fabro-petri`
from the admitted graph's metadata (the workflow name and goal from the
graph params; each declared stage's label and handler kind; one edge per
routing arm as written, lowering artifacts left out), and stored on the
spec at create beside the DOT as `graph_source`.
Deleted: `fabro-workflow`'s `pipeline`, `transforms`, `file_resolver`,
`operations::{source, validate}`, `run_materialization` and the legacy
`compile_admitted_run`; the server's `compile_admitted`, the structural
manifest pass, `preflight_model` and the model probe `run_llm_check`
(Petri's admission raises `attractor.model.unknown`); `fabro-graphviz`'s
stylesheet parser; most of `fabro_types::graph` (the DOT model keeps
what the bundler, version registration and template walker read). The
DOT parser stays for the bundler and the SVG render.
`POST /validate`, `POST /preflight`, `POST /graph/render`, `fabro
validate` and `fabro preflight` run on Petri's check alone, so their
diagnostics carry Petri's codes (`attractor.unbound_input`,
`unsupported.template.unbound_input`) where Fabro's
`template_undefined_variable` and `goal_self_reference` were. A refused
workflow's summary still names the DOT as written. The OpenAPI `RunSpec`
schema gains `RunGraph`, `RunGraphNode` and `RunGraphEdge`, reused from
`fabro-types` with parity tests; the TS client is regenerated.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| src | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| README.md | ||
fabro-workflow
A DOT-based pipeline runner for multi-stage AI workflows. Define workflows as Graphviz digraph files and execute them with pluggable handlers, conditional routing, human-in-the-loop gates, parallel branching, retry policies, and checkpoint-based recovery.
Key Concepts
- Graph -- A directed graph parsed from DOT syntax containing nodes, edges, and attributes. The graph carries a
goaldescribing the pipeline's purpose. - Node -- A workflow step. Graphviz shapes map to handler types (e.g.,
Mdiamond= start,Msquare= exit,box= agent,tab= prompt,diamond= conditional,hexagon= human gate,component= parallel). - Edge -- A connection between nodes with optional
condition,label,weight, andfidelityattributes that control routing. - Handler -- An async trait implementation that executes a node and returns an
Outcome. Built-in handlers includeStartHandler,ExitHandler,AgentHandler,PromptHandler,ConditionalHandler,HumanHandler,ParallelHandler,FanInHandler,CommandHandler, andSubWorkflowHandler. - Outcome -- The result of executing a handler, carrying a
StageOutcome(Success, Fail, PartialSuccess, Retry, Skipped), optional routing hints (preferred_label,suggested_next_ids), and context updates. - Context -- A thread-safe key-value store shared across pipeline stages, supporting snapshots and isolated cloning for parallel branches.
- Interviewer -- A trait for human-in-the-loop interactions. Implementations include
AutoApproveInterviewerandControlInterviewer. - Checkpoint -- A serializable snapshot of execution state (completed nodes, context values) for crash recovery and resume.
Pipeline Definition
Pipelines are defined using Graphviz DOT syntax:
digraph MyPipeline {
graph [goal="Implement and validate a feature"]
rankdir=LR
node [shape=box, timeout="900s"]
start [shape=Mdiamond, label="Start"]
exit [shape=Msquare, label="Exit"]
plan [label="Plan", prompt="Plan the implementation"]
implement [label="Implement", prompt="Implement the plan"]
validate [label="Validate", prompt="Run tests"]
gate [shape=diamond, label="Tests passing?"]
start -> plan -> implement -> validate -> gate
gate -> exit [label="Yes", condition="outcome=succeeded"]
gate -> implement [label="No", condition="outcome!=succeeded"]
}
Usage
Parsing and Validating a Pipeline
use fabro_workflow::operations::{create, CreateOptions};
let dot_source = r#"digraph Simple {
graph [goal="Run tests"]
start [shape=Mdiamond]
exit [shape=Msquare]
work [shape=box, prompt="Run the test suite"]
start -> work -> exit
}"#;
let validated = create(dot_source, CreateOptions::default())
.expect("pipeline should parse");
validated.raise_on_errors().expect("pipeline should validate");
let (graph, _, _) = validated.into_parts();
assert_eq!(graph.name, "Simple");
assert_eq!(graph.goal(), "Run tests");
operations::create parses the DOT source, applies built-in transforms (variable expansion, stylesheet application, preamble injection), and returns diagnostics through Validated.
Running a Pipeline
use fabro_workflow::operations::start;
use fabro_workflow::pipeline;
// Use `operations::start(...)` for the full
// initialize -> execute -> conclude -> publish -> finalize flow.
// Use `pipeline::initialize(...)` + `pipeline::execute(...)` when you need partial lifecycle control.
Custom Handlers
Implement the Handler trait to add custom node behavior:
use arc_workflows::handler::Handler;
use arc_workflows::context::Context;
use arc_workflows::graph::{Graph, Node};
use arc_workflows::outcome::Outcome;
use arc_workflows::error::ArcError;
use async_trait::async_trait;
use std::path::Path;
struct MyHandler;
#[async_trait]
impl Handler for MyHandler {
async fn execute(
&self,
node: &Node,
context: &Context,
graph: &Graph,
run_dir: &Path,
) -> Result<Outcome, ArcError> {
// Custom logic here
Ok(Outcome::success())
}
}
Model Stylesheets
CSS-like stylesheets control LLM model assignment with specificity-based cascading:
digraph Styled {
graph [
goal="Build feature",
model_stylesheet="
* { model: claude-sonnet-4-5;}
.code { model: claude-opus-4-6; }
#critical_review { model: gpt-5.2;}
"
]
// ...
}
Selectors by specificity: * (universal, 0) < shape (1) < .class (2) < #id (3). Explicit node attributes are never overridden.
Condition Expressions
Edge conditions use a simple expression syntax for routing:
outcome=succeeded
outcome!=failed
outcome=succeeded && context.tests_passed=true
my_flag
Clauses support =, !=, and bare key truthiness checks, joined with &&.
Human-in-the-Loop Gates
Nodes with shape=hexagon or type="human" pause execution for human input. Outgoing edge labels become selectable options, with accelerator key parsing for patterns like [A] Approve and F) Fix.
Parallel Execution
Nodes with shape=component fan out to branches concurrently. Branches receive isolated context forks, share the same sandbox checkout, and always finish before the workflow continues. Use max_parallel to limit concurrency; concurrent workspace writes are user-managed.
Checkpoints and Resume
The engine saves a checkpoint after each node. Resume from a checkpoint with engine.run_from_checkpoint(&graph, &config, &checkpoint).
Architecture
parser (DOT -> AST -> Graph)
-> transform (variable expansion, stylesheet, preamble)
-> validation (14 lint rules)
-> engine (execution loop with retry, edge selection, goal gates)
-> handler (pluggable node executors)
-> interviewer (human-in-the-loop I/O)