fabro/lib/components/fabro-workflow
Bryan Helmkamp 52aed8c642
Read the run's display graph off Petri's admitted graph
Every run is admitted by Petri, whose check lowers imports, file
references, templates and the model stylesheet, lints the workflow and
pins its models. Fabro then re-parsed the same workflow through its own
legacy pipeline (parse, transforms, structural validation) only to fill
`RunSpec.graph` for the read side. That second pass is gone: the run's
display graph is `fabro_types::RunGraph`, built once in `fabro-petri`
from the admitted graph's metadata (the workflow name and goal from the
graph params; each declared stage's label and handler kind; one edge per
routing arm as written, lowering artifacts left out), and stored on the
spec at create beside the DOT as `graph_source`.

Deleted: `fabro-workflow`'s `pipeline`, `transforms`, `file_resolver`,
`operations::{source, validate}`, `run_materialization` and the legacy
`compile_admitted_run`; the server's `compile_admitted`, the structural
manifest pass, `preflight_model` and the model probe `run_llm_check`
(Petri's admission raises `attractor.model.unknown`); `fabro-graphviz`'s
stylesheet parser; most of `fabro_types::graph` (the DOT model keeps
what the bundler, version registration and template walker read). The
DOT parser stays for the bundler and the SVG render.

`POST /validate`, `POST /preflight`, `POST /graph/render`, `fabro
validate` and `fabro preflight` run on Petri's check alone, so their
diagnostics carry Petri's codes (`attractor.unbound_input`,
`unsupported.template.unbound_input`) where Fabro's
`template_undefined_variable` and `goal_self_reference` were. A refused
workflow's summary still names the DOT as written. The OpenAPI `RunSpec`
schema gains `RunGraph`, `RunGraphNode` and `RunGraphEdge`, reused from
`fabro-types` with parity tests; the TS client is regenerated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-19 11:41:38 -04:00
..
src Read the run's display graph off Petri's admitted graph 2026-09-19 11:41:38 -04:00
Cargo.toml Drop the dependency edges with no production use 2026-09-19 09:33:31 -04:00
README.md Delete the interviewers the Petri cutover left unused 2026-09-19 09:05:52 -04:00

fabro-workflow

A DOT-based pipeline runner for multi-stage AI workflows. Define workflows as Graphviz digraph files and execute them with pluggable handlers, conditional routing, human-in-the-loop gates, parallel branching, retry policies, and checkpoint-based recovery.

Key Concepts

  • Graph -- A directed graph parsed from DOT syntax containing nodes, edges, and attributes. The graph carries a goal describing the pipeline's purpose.
  • Node -- A workflow step. Graphviz shapes map to handler types (e.g., Mdiamond = start, Msquare = exit, box = agent, tab = prompt, diamond = conditional, hexagon = human gate, component = parallel).
  • Edge -- A connection between nodes with optional condition, label, weight, and fidelity attributes that control routing.
  • Handler -- An async trait implementation that executes a node and returns an Outcome. Built-in handlers include StartHandler, ExitHandler, AgentHandler, PromptHandler, ConditionalHandler, HumanHandler, ParallelHandler, FanInHandler, CommandHandler, and SubWorkflowHandler.
  • Outcome -- The result of executing a handler, carrying a StageOutcome (Success, Fail, PartialSuccess, Retry, Skipped), optional routing hints (preferred_label, suggested_next_ids), and context updates.
  • Context -- A thread-safe key-value store shared across pipeline stages, supporting snapshots and isolated cloning for parallel branches.
  • Interviewer -- A trait for human-in-the-loop interactions. Implementations include AutoApproveInterviewer and ControlInterviewer.
  • Checkpoint -- A serializable snapshot of execution state (completed nodes, context values) for crash recovery and resume.

Pipeline Definition

Pipelines are defined using Graphviz DOT syntax:

digraph MyPipeline {
    graph [goal="Implement and validate a feature"]
    rankdir=LR
    node [shape=box, timeout="900s"]

    start     [shape=Mdiamond, label="Start"]
    exit      [shape=Msquare, label="Exit"]
    plan      [label="Plan", prompt="Plan the implementation"]
    implement [label="Implement", prompt="Implement the plan"]
    validate  [label="Validate", prompt="Run tests"]
    gate      [shape=diamond, label="Tests passing?"]

    start -> plan -> implement -> validate -> gate
    gate -> exit      [label="Yes", condition="outcome=succeeded"]
    gate -> implement [label="No", condition="outcome!=succeeded"]
}

Usage

Parsing and Validating a Pipeline

use fabro_workflow::operations::{create, CreateOptions};

let dot_source = r#"digraph Simple {
    graph [goal="Run tests"]
    start [shape=Mdiamond]
    exit  [shape=Msquare]
    work  [shape=box, prompt="Run the test suite"]
    start -> work -> exit
}"#;

let validated = create(dot_source, CreateOptions::default())
    .expect("pipeline should parse");
validated.raise_on_errors().expect("pipeline should validate");
let (graph, _, _) = validated.into_parts();
assert_eq!(graph.name, "Simple");
assert_eq!(graph.goal(), "Run tests");

operations::create parses the DOT source, applies built-in transforms (variable expansion, stylesheet application, preamble injection), and returns diagnostics through Validated.

Running a Pipeline

use fabro_workflow::operations::start;
use fabro_workflow::pipeline;

// Use `operations::start(...)` for the full
// initialize -> execute -> conclude -> publish -> finalize flow.
// Use `pipeline::initialize(...)` + `pipeline::execute(...)` when you need partial lifecycle control.

Custom Handlers

Implement the Handler trait to add custom node behavior:

use arc_workflows::handler::Handler;
use arc_workflows::context::Context;
use arc_workflows::graph::{Graph, Node};
use arc_workflows::outcome::Outcome;
use arc_workflows::error::ArcError;
use async_trait::async_trait;
use std::path::Path;

struct MyHandler;

#[async_trait]
impl Handler for MyHandler {
    async fn execute(
        &self,
        node: &Node,
        context: &Context,
        graph: &Graph,
        run_dir: &Path,
    ) -> Result<Outcome, ArcError> {
        // Custom logic here
        Ok(Outcome::success())
    }
}

Model Stylesheets

CSS-like stylesheets control LLM model assignment with specificity-based cascading:

digraph Styled {
    graph [
        goal="Build feature",
        model_stylesheet="
            * { model: claude-sonnet-4-5;}
            .code { model: claude-opus-4-6; }
            #critical_review { model: gpt-5.2;}
        "
    ]
    // ...
}

Selectors by specificity: * (universal, 0) < shape (1) < .class (2) < #id (3). Explicit node attributes are never overridden.

Condition Expressions

Edge conditions use a simple expression syntax for routing:

outcome=succeeded
outcome!=failed
outcome=succeeded && context.tests_passed=true
my_flag

Clauses support =, !=, and bare key truthiness checks, joined with &&.

Human-in-the-Loop Gates

Nodes with shape=hexagon or type="human" pause execution for human input. Outgoing edge labels become selectable options, with accelerator key parsing for patterns like [A] Approve and F) Fix.

Parallel Execution

Nodes with shape=component fan out to branches concurrently. Branches receive isolated context forks, share the same sandbox checkout, and always finish before the workflow continues. Use max_parallel to limit concurrency; concurrent workspace writes are user-managed.

Checkpoints and Resume

The engine saves a checkpoint after each node. Resume from a checkpoint with engine.run_from_checkpoint(&graph, &config, &checkpoint).

Architecture

parser (DOT -> AST -> Graph)
  -> transform (variable expansion, stylesheet, preamble)
    -> validation (14 lint rules)
      -> engine (execution loop with retry, edge selection, goal gates)
        -> handler (pluggable node executors)
          -> interviewer (human-in-the-loop I/O)