mirror of
https://github.com/fabro-sh/fabro.git
synced 2026-09-06 08:18:58 +00:00
97 lines
No EOL
8 KiB
JSON
97 lines
No EOL
8 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:34:31.240992Z",
|
||
"current_node": "extract_patch",
|
||
"completed_nodes": [
|
||
"start",
|
||
"setup",
|
||
"solve",
|
||
"extract_patch"
|
||
],
|
||
"node_retries": {
|
||
"start": 1,
|
||
"extract_patch": 1,
|
||
"solve": 1,
|
||
"setup": 1
|
||
},
|
||
"context_values": {
|
||
"last_response": "Implemented the fix in the Django checkout at:\n\n- `.task/django/django/core/checks/model_checks.py`\n- `.task/django/tests/check_framework/test_model_checks.py`\n\nWhat changed:\n- Kept `models.E028` for ",
|
||
"response.solve": "Implemented the fix in the Django checkout at:\n\n- `.task/django/django/core/checks/model_checks.py`\n- `.task/django/tests/check_framework/test_model_checks.py`\n\nWhat changed:\n- Kept `models.E028` for duplicate `db_table` names by default.\n- If `settings.DATABASE_ROUTERS` is non-empty, the check now emits a warning instead:\n - `models.W035`\n - with a hint telling users to verify routing to separate databases.\n\nThis matches the issue’s requested behavior and keeps the change minimal.\n\nValidation:\n- Installed the checkout: `python -m pip install -e .`\n- Ran targeted tests successfully:\n - `python tests/runtests.py check_framework.test_model_checks`\n\nResult:\n- 18 tests passed.",
|
||
"last_stage": "solve",
|
||
"internal.retry_count.start": 1,
|
||
"thread.start.current_node": "setup",
|
||
"thread.solve.current_node": "extract_patch",
|
||
"internal.fidelity": "compact",
|
||
"command.output": "diff --git a/.task/django b/.task/django\n--- a/.task/django\n+++ b/.task/django\n@@ -1 +1 @@\n-Subproject commit 65e86948b80262574058a94ccaae3a9b59c3faea\n+Subproject commit 65e86948b80262574058a94ccaae3a9b59c3faea-dirty\n",
|
||
"current_node": "extract_patch",
|
||
"thread.setup.current_node": "solve",
|
||
"failure_class": "",
|
||
"internal.retry_count.extract_patch": 1,
|
||
"current.preamble": "Goal: Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name.\nDescription\n\t\nError message:\ntable_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName.\nWe have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names.\nWe have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names. \nIs this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nRegression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\nI agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 65e86948b80262574058a94ccaae3a9b59c3faea && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n- **solve**: success\n - Model: gpt-5.4, 326.3k tokens in / 4.0k out\n",
|
||
"internal.thread_id": "solve",
|
||
"outcome": "success",
|
||
"internal.retry_count.setup": 1,
|
||
"internal.run_id": "01KKTJ3NYSF3ATKMXR1RPWGM9T",
|
||
"command.stderr": "",
|
||
"internal.retry_count.solve": 1,
|
||
"graph.goal": "Django throws error when different apps with different models have the same name table name.\nDescription\n\t\nError message:\ntable_name: (models.E028) db_table 'table_name' is used by multiple models: base.ModelName, app2.ModelName.\nWe have a Base app that points to a central database and that has its own tables. We then have multiple Apps that talk to their own databases. Some share the same table names.\nWe have used this setup for a while, but after upgrading to Django 2.2 we're getting an error saying we're not allowed 2 apps, with 2 different models to have the same table names. \nIs this correct behavior? We've had to roll back to Django 2.0 for now.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nRegression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.\nI agree with your opinion. Assigning to myself, patch on its way Replying to Claude Paroz: Regression in [5d25804eaf81795c7d457e5a2a9f0b9b0989136c], ticket #20098. My opinion is that as soon as the project has a non-empty DATABASE_ROUTERS setting, the error should be turned into a warning, as it becomes difficult to say for sure that it's an error. And then the project can add the warning in SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS.",
|
||
"internal.node_visit_count": 1,
|
||
"failure_signature": "",
|
||
"graph.rankdir": "LR"
|
||
},
|
||
"logs": [],
|
||
"node_outcomes": {
|
||
"solve": {
|
||
"status": "success",
|
||
"context_updates": {
|
||
"last_stage": "solve",
|
||
"last_response": "Implemented the fix in the Django checkout at:\n\n- `.task/django/django/core/checks/model_checks.py`\n- `.task/django/tests/check_framework/test_model_checks.py`\n\nWhat changed:\n- Kept `models.E028` for ",
|
||
"response.solve": "Implemented the fix in the Django checkout at:\n\n- `.task/django/django/core/checks/model_checks.py`\n- `.task/django/tests/check_framework/test_model_checks.py`\n\nWhat changed:\n- Kept `models.E028` for duplicate `db_table` names by default.\n- If `settings.DATABASE_ROUTERS` is non-empty, the check now emits a warning instead:\n - `models.W035`\n - with a hint telling users to verify routing to separate databases.\n\nThis matches the issue’s requested behavior and keeps the change minimal.\n\nValidation:\n- Installed the checkout: `python -m pip install -e .`\n- Ran targeted tests successfully:\n - `python tests/runtests.py check_framework.test_model_checks`\n\nResult:\n- 18 tests passed."
|
||
},
|
||
"notes": "Stage completed: solve",
|
||
"usage": {
|
||
"model": "gpt-5.4",
|
||
"input_tokens": 326269,
|
||
"output_tokens": 4030,
|
||
"cache_read_tokens": 304256,
|
||
"reasoning_tokens": 1903,
|
||
"cost": 0.8761225
|
||
},
|
||
"duration_ms": 99688
|
||
},
|
||
"start": {
|
||
"status": "success",
|
||
"duration_ms": 0
|
||
},
|
||
"extract_patch": {
|
||
"status": "success",
|
||
"context_updates": {
|
||
"command.output": "diff --git a/.task/django b/.task/django\n--- a/.task/django\n+++ b/.task/django\n@@ -1 +1 @@\n-Subproject commit 65e86948b80262574058a94ccaae3a9b59c3faea\n+Subproject commit 65e86948b80262574058a94ccaae3a9b59c3faea-dirty\n",
|
||
"command.stderr": ""
|
||
},
|
||
"notes": "Script completed: git diff",
|
||
"duration_ms": 57
|
||
},
|
||
"setup": {
|
||
"status": "fail",
|
||
"context_updates": {
|
||
"command.output": "fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
|
||
"command.stderr": ""
|
||
},
|
||
"failure": {
|
||
"message": "Script failed with exit code: 128\n\n## stdout\nfatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
|
||
"failure_class": "deterministic"
|
||
},
|
||
"duration_ms": 46
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
"next_node_id": "exit",
|
||
"loop_failure_signatures": {
|
||
"setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.": 1
|
||
},
|
||
"node_visits": {
|
||
"start": 1,
|
||
"solve": 1,
|
||
"setup": 1,
|
||
"extract_patch": 1
|
||
}
|
||
} |