--- title: "Transitions" description: "How Fabro decides which node to execute next" --- After each node finishes, Fabro must decide which edge to follow to the next node. This decision is deterministic by default — given the same outcome and context, Fabro always picks the same edge. Nodes can opt into [random selection](#random-selection) for weighted-random tiebreaking instead. Understanding the transition logic helps you design workflows that route reliably. ## How transitions work When a node completes, it produces an **outcome** with a [status](/execution/outcomes) (`success`, `fail`, `partial_success`, or `skipped`) and optional signals like a preferred label or suggested next node. Fabro evaluates the outgoing edges in a fixed priority order: 1. **Condition match** — Edges with a `condition` attribute are evaluated first. If one or more conditions match, the edge with the highest `weight` wins (lexical tiebreak on target node ID). 2. **Preferred label** — If the node's outcome includes a preferred label (e.g. from a human gate selection), the edge whose `label` matches is chosen. 3. **Suggested next** — If the node suggests a specific next node ID, the edge pointing to that node is chosen. 4. **Unconditional fallback** — Edges without conditions are considered last, again using `weight` then lexical tiebreak. If no edge matches at all, the workflow halts with an error. ## Edge attributes | Attribute | Description | |---|---| | `label` | Display text on the edge; also used for human gate option matching | | `condition` | Boolean expression that must evaluate to true for this edge (see below) | | `weight` | Numeric priority for tiebreaking (higher wins, default: 0) | ## Conditions Edge conditions are boolean expressions evaluated against the stage outcome and run context. Conditions go in the `condition` attribute on an edge: ```dot gate -> exit [label="Pass", condition="outcome=success"] gate -> implement [label="Fix", condition="outcome=fail"] ``` ### Available keys | Key | Resolves to | |---|---| | `outcome` | The stage status: `success`, `fail`, `partial_success`, or `skipped`. See [Node Outcomes](/execution/outcomes). | | `preferred_label` | The label selected by a human gate | | `context.KEY` | A value from the run context (e.g. `context.tests_passed`) | | `KEY` | Shorthand for context lookup (without the `context.` prefix) | ### Operators | Operator | Example | Description | |---|---|---| | `=` | `outcome=success` | Equality | | `!=` | `outcome!=fail` | Inequality | | `>` | `context.score > 80` | Greater than (numeric) | | `<` | `context.count < 5` | Less than (numeric) | | `>=` | `context.score >= 80` | Greater than or equal (numeric) | | `<=` | `context.count <= 10` | Less than or equal (numeric) | | `contains` | `context.message contains error` | Substring match, or array membership | | `matches` | `context.version matches ^v\d+` | Regular expression match | A bare key with no operator is a **truthiness check** — it passes if the value is non-empty, not `"false"`, and not `"0"`: ```dot gate -> next [condition="my_flag"] ``` ### Combining conditions Use `&&` (AND), `||` (OR), and `!` (NOT) to build compound expressions. `&&` binds tighter than `||`: ```dot // Both must be true gate -> deploy [condition="outcome=success && context.tests_passed=true"] // Either can be true gate -> proceed [condition="outcome=success || outcome=partial_success"] // Negation gate -> retry [condition="!outcome=success"] // Mixed precedence: (a AND b) OR c gate -> next [condition="outcome=success && context.ready=true || context.override"] ``` ## Agent transitions Agent and prompt nodes can influence which edge is taken by including a JSON object in their response with routing directives. Fabro scans the LLM output for the last JSON object containing any of these fields: ```json { "preferred_next_label": "fix", "suggested_next_ids": ["implement", "review"], "context_updates": { "tests_passed": true } } ``` | Field | Effect | |---|---| | `preferred_next_label` | Matched against edge labels (same as human gate selection) | | `suggested_next_ids` | Ordered list of preferred target node IDs | | `context_updates` | Key-value pairs merged into the run context for downstream conditions | Fabro automatically scans LLM output for these JSON objects — no special configuration is needed. However, you do need to instruct the LLM to emit the JSON in your prompt. For example: ```dot review [ label="Review", shape=tab, prompt="Review the implementation for correctness and \ code quality. If changes are needed, respond with: \ {\"preferred_next_label\": \"fix\"}. If everything \ looks good, respond with: \ {\"preferred_next_label\": \"approve\"}." ] review -> fix [label="Fix"] review -> approve [label="Approve"] ``` The LLM's natural language response can contain other text — Fabro finds the last JSON object with a recognized routing field and extracts the directives from it. ## Human gate transitions Human gates use edge labels to present options to the user. The selected label becomes the `preferred_label` in the outcome, and Fabro matches it to the corresponding edge: ```dot approve [shape=hexagon, label="Approve Plan"] approve -> implement [label="[A] Approve"] approve -> plan [label="[R] Revise"] approve -> skip [label="[S] Skip"] ``` The `[A]`, `[R]`, `[S]` prefixes are keyboard accelerators — Fabro strips them when matching, so the user can type just the letter. ## Unconditional edges An edge without a `condition` attribute always matches. When a node has a single outgoing edge, it doesn't need a condition: ```dot start -> plan -> implement -> exit ``` When mixing conditional and unconditional edges, conditional matches take priority. An unconditional edge acts as the default fallback: ```dot gate -> fast_path [condition="outcome=success"] gate -> slow_path ``` ## Weight tiebreaking When multiple edges match (e.g. two unconditional edges), `weight` determines the winner. Higher weight wins: ```dot node -> preferred [weight=10] node -> fallback [weight=1] ``` If weights are equal, the edge with the lexicographically first target node ID is chosen. This makes the behavior fully deterministic. ## Random selection By default, tiebreaking between candidate edges is deterministic (highest weight, then lexical node ID). Setting `selection="random"` on a node switches to weighted-random tiebreaking for its outgoing edges: ```dot picker [label="Pick path", selection="random"] picker -> path_a [weight=3] picker -> path_b [weight=1] ``` In this example, `path_a` is chosen ~75% of the time and `path_b` ~25%. Edges with weight ≤ 0 are treated as weight 1. The cascade priority (conditions → preferred label → suggested next → unconditional) is unchanged — randomness only affects the pick-one-from-candidates step within each tier. `selection="random"` cannot be combined with conditional edges on the same node. Validation rejects this combination because condition evaluation order would conflict with random selection. Use unconditional edges with weights instead.