From e0c850fabc1e3c9898f3608d467cfd56bf8f25df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabro <noreply@fabro.sh>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:32:35 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] init run
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

⚒️ Generated with [Fabro](https://fabro.sh)
---
 graph.fabro   | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 manifest.json | 13 +++++++++++++
 sandbox.json  |  5 +++++
 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 graph.fabro
 create mode 100644 manifest.json
 create mode 100644 sandbox.json

diff --git a/graph.fabro b/graph.fabro
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9ddf6dd0b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/graph.fabro
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+digraph SWEBench {
+    graph [goal="Allow ValidationErrors to equal each other when created identically
+Description
+	 
+		(last modified by kamni)
+	 
+Currently ValidationErrors (django.core.exceptions.ValidationError) that have identical messages don't equal each other, which is counter-intuitive, and can make certain kinds of testing more complicated. Please add an __eq__ method that allows two ValidationErrors to be compared. 
+Ideally, this would be more than just a simple self.messages == other.messages. It would be most helpful if the comparison were independent of the order in which errors were raised in a field or in non_field_errors.
+
+
+
+## Additional Context
+
+I probably wouldn't want to limit the comparison to an error's message but rather to its full set of attributes (message, code, params). While params is always pushed into message when iterating over the errors in an ValidationError, I believe it can be beneficial to know if the params that were put inside are the same.
+​PR"]
+    rankdir=LR
+
+    start [shape=Mdiamond]
+    exit  [shape=Msquare]
+
+    setup         [label="Setup", shape=parallelogram, script="git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 16218c20606d8cd89c5393970c83da04598a3e04 && python -m pip install -e ."]
+    solve         [label="Solve", prompt="Fix this GitHub issue in the repository. Make the minimal code change needed.\n\nAllow ValidationErrors to equal each other when created identically
+Description
+	 
+		(last modified by kamni)
+	 
+Currently ValidationErrors (django.core.exceptions.ValidationError) that have identical messages don't equal each other, which is counter-intuitive, and can make certain kinds of testing more complicated. Please add an __eq__ method that allows two ValidationErrors to be compared. 
+Ideally, this would be more than just a simple self.messages == other.messages. It would be most helpful if the comparison were independent of the order in which errors were raised in a field or in non_field_errors.
+
+
+
+## Additional Context
+
+I probably wouldn't want to limit the comparison to an error's message but rather to its full set of attributes (message, code, params). While params is always pushed into message when iterating over the errors in an ValidationError, I believe it can be beneficial to know if the params that were put inside are the same.
+​PR"]
+    extract_patch [label="Extract Patch", shape=parallelogram, script="git diff"]
+
+    start -> setup -> solve -> extract_patch -> exit
+}
diff --git a/manifest.json b/manifest.json
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f2b9dcb58
--- /dev/null
+++ b/manifest.json
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "run_id": "01KKTJ3AHTPXR8PM2P2AA8E7R4",
+  "workflow_name": "SWEBench",
+  "goal": "Allow ValidationErrors to equal each other when created identically\nDescription\n\t \n\t\t(last modified by kamni)\n\t \nCurrently ValidationErrors (django.core.exceptions.ValidationError) that have identical messages don't equal each other, which is counter-intuitive, and can make certain kinds of testing more complicated. Please add an __eq__ method that allows two ValidationErrors to be compared. \nIdeally, this would be more than just a simple self.messages == other.messages. It would be most helpful if the comparison were independent of the order in which errors were raised in a field or in non_field_errors.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nI probably wouldn't want to limit the comparison to an error's message but rather to its full set of attributes (message, code, params). While params is always pushed into message when iterating over the errors in an ValidationError, I believe it can be beneficial to know if the params that were put inside are the same.\n​PR",
+  "start_time": "2026-03-16T05:32:35.662932Z",
+  "node_count": 5,
+  "edge_count": 4,
+  "run_branch": "fabro/run/01KKTJ3AHTPXR8PM2P2AA8E7R4",
+  "base_sha": "470fcfe1200b2102c0cdf91c73b0ed8d925f258a",
+  "base_branch": "main",
+  "workflow_slug": "django__django-13220",
+  "host_repo_path": "/Users/bhelmkamp/p/fabro-sh/fabro/evals/swe-bench/results/opus-baseline/runs/django__django-13220"
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/sandbox.json b/sandbox.json
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9a59a69fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sandbox.json
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "provider": "daytona",
+  "working_directory": "/home/daytona/workspace",
+  "identifier": "fabro-01KKTJ3AHTPXR8PM2P2AA8E7R4"
+}
\ No newline at end of file