init run

⚒️ Generated with [Fabro](https://fabro.sh)

graph.fabro

@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+digraph SWEBench {
+    graph [goal="AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index().
+Description
+	
+	class Meta:
+		db_table = 'look_image'
+		order_with_respect_to = 'look'
+		indexes = [
+			models.Index(fields=['look', '_order']),
+			models.Index(fields=['created_at']),
+			models.Index(fields=['updated_at']),
+		]
+migrations.CreateModel(
+			name='LookImage',
+			fields=[
+				('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),
+				('look', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, related_name='images', to='posts.Look', verbose_name='LOOK')),
+				('image_url', models.URLField(blank=True, max_length=10000, null=True)),
+				('image', models.ImageField(max_length=2000, upload_to='')),
+				('deleted', models.DateTimeField(editable=False, null=True)),
+				('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),
+				('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)),
+			],
+		),
+		migrations.AddIndex(
+			model_name='lookimage',
+			index=models.Index(fields=['look', '_order'], name='look_image_look_id_eaff30_idx'),
+		),
+		migrations.AddIndex(
+			model_name='lookimage',
+			index=models.Index(fields=['created_at'], name='look_image_created_f746cf_idx'),
+		),
+		migrations.AddIndex(
+			model_name='lookimage',
+			index=models.Index(fields=['updated_at'], name='look_image_updated_aceaf9_idx'),
+		),
+		migrations.AlterOrderWithRespectTo(
+			name='lookimage',
+			order_with_respect_to='look',
+		),
+I added orders_with_respect_to in new model class's Meta class and also made index for '_order' field by combining with other field. And a new migration file based on the model looks like the code above.
+The problem is operation AlterOrderWithRespectTo after AddIndex of '_order' raising error because '_order' field had not been created yet.
+It seems to be AlterOrderWithRespectTo has to proceed before AddIndex of '_order'.
+
+
+
+## Additional Context
+
+Thanks for this report. IMO order_with_respect_to should be included in CreateModel()'s options, I'm not sure why it is in a separate operation when it refers to a ForeignKey.
+I reproduced the issue adding order_with_respect_to and indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] at the same time to an existent model. class Meta: order_with_respect_to = 'foo' indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] A small broken test: ​https://github.com/iurisilvio/django/commit/5c6504e67f1d2749efd13daca440dfa54708a4b2 I'll try to fix the issue, but I'm not sure the way to fix it. Can we reorder autodetected migrations?
+​PR"]
+    rankdir=LR
+
+    start [shape=Mdiamond]
+    exit  [shape=Msquare]
+
+    setup         [label="Setup", shape=parallelogram, script="git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout b2b0711b555fa292751763c2df4fe577c396f265 && python -m pip install -e ."]
+    solve         [label="Solve", prompt="Fix this GitHub issue in the repository. Make the minimal code change needed.\n\nAlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index().
+Description
+	
+	class Meta:
+		db_table = 'look_image'
+		order_with_respect_to = 'look'
+		indexes = [
+			models.Index(fields=['look', '_order']),
+			models.Index(fields=['created_at']),
+			models.Index(fields=['updated_at']),
+		]
+migrations.CreateModel(
+			name='LookImage',
+			fields=[
+				('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),
+				('look', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, related_name='images', to='posts.Look', verbose_name='LOOK')),
+				('image_url', models.URLField(blank=True, max_length=10000, null=True)),
+				('image', models.ImageField(max_length=2000, upload_to='')),
+				('deleted', models.DateTimeField(editable=False, null=True)),
+				('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),
+				('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)),
+			],
+		),
+		migrations.AddIndex(
+			model_name='lookimage',
+			index=models.Index(fields=['look', '_order'], name='look_image_look_id_eaff30_idx'),
+		),
+		migrations.AddIndex(
+			model_name='lookimage',
+			index=models.Index(fields=['created_at'], name='look_image_created_f746cf_idx'),
+		),
+		migrations.AddIndex(
+			model_name='lookimage',
+			index=models.Index(fields=['updated_at'], name='look_image_updated_aceaf9_idx'),
+		),
+		migrations.AlterOrderWithRespectTo(
+			name='lookimage',
+			order_with_respect_to='look',
+		),
+I added orders_with_respect_to in new model class's Meta class and also made index for '_order' field by combining with other field. And a new migration file based on the model looks like the code above.
+The problem is operation AlterOrderWithRespectTo after AddIndex of '_order' raising error because '_order' field had not been created yet.
+It seems to be AlterOrderWithRespectTo has to proceed before AddIndex of '_order'.
+
+
+
+## Additional Context
+
+Thanks for this report. IMO order_with_respect_to should be included in CreateModel()'s options, I'm not sure why it is in a separate operation when it refers to a ForeignKey.
+I reproduced the issue adding order_with_respect_to and indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] at the same time to an existent model. class Meta: order_with_respect_to = 'foo' indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] A small broken test: ​https://github.com/iurisilvio/django/commit/5c6504e67f1d2749efd13daca440dfa54708a4b2 I'll try to fix the issue, but I'm not sure the way to fix it. Can we reorder autodetected migrations?
+​PR"]
+    extract_patch [label="Extract Patch", shape=parallelogram, script="git diff"]
+
+    start -> setup -> solve -> extract_patch -> exit
+}

manifest.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "run_id": "01KKTJ36SCY6TBFTKJNR8HV875",
+  "workflow_name": "SWEBench",
+  "goal": "AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index().\nDescription\n\t\n\tclass Meta:\n\t\tdb_table = 'look_image'\n\t\torder_with_respect_to = 'look'\n\t\tindexes = [\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['look', '_order']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['created_at']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['updated_at']),\n\t\t]\nmigrations.CreateModel(\n\t\t\tname='LookImage',\n\t\t\tfields=[\n\t\t\t\t('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),\n\t\t\t\t('look', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, related_name='images', to='posts.Look', verbose_name='LOOK')),\n\t\t\t\t('image_url', models.URLField(blank=True, max_length=10000, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('image', models.ImageField(max_length=2000, upload_to='')),\n\t\t\t\t('deleted', models.DateTimeField(editable=False, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)),\n\t\t\t],\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['look', '_order'], name='look_image_look_id_eaff30_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['created_at'], name='look_image_created_f746cf_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['updated_at'], name='look_image_updated_aceaf9_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AlterOrderWithRespectTo(\n\t\t\tname='lookimage',\n\t\t\torder_with_respect_to='look',\n\t\t),\nI added orders_with_respect_to in new model class's Meta class and also made index for '_order' field by combining with other field. And a new migration file based on the model looks like the code above.\nThe problem is operation AlterOrderWithRespectTo after AddIndex of '_order' raising error because '_order' field had not been created yet.\nIt seems to be AlterOrderWithRespectTo has to proceed before AddIndex of '_order'.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nThanks for this report. IMO order_with_respect_to should be included in CreateModel()'s options, I'm not sure why it is in a separate operation when it refers to a ForeignKey.\nI reproduced the issue adding order_with_respect_to and indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] at the same time to an existent model. class Meta: order_with_respect_to = 'foo' indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] A small broken test: ​https://github.com/iurisilvio/django/commit/5c6504e67f1d2749efd13daca440dfa54708a4b2 I'll try to fix the issue, but I'm not sure the way to fix it. Can we reorder autodetected migrations?\n​PR",
+  "start_time": "2026-03-16T05:32:33.870119Z",
+  "node_count": 5,
+  "edge_count": 4,
+  "run_branch": "fabro/run/01KKTJ36SCY6TBFTKJNR8HV875",
+  "base_sha": "470fcfe1200b2102c0cdf91c73b0ed8d925f258a",
+  "base_branch": "main",
+  "workflow_slug": "django__django-13265",
+  "host_repo_path": "/Users/bhelmkamp/p/fabro-sh/fabro/evals/swe-bench/results/haiku-baseline/runs/django__django-13265"
+}

sandbox.json

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "provider": "daytona",
+  "working_directory": "/home/daytona/workspace",
+  "identifier": "fabro-01KKTJ36SCY6TBFTKJNR8HV875"
+}