From a8013a145fb73266cc8bd582a1d791fe4c260423 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fabro Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:35:49 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] checkpoint MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ⚒️ Generated with [Fabro](https://fabro.sh) --- checkpoint.json | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- nodes/solve/prompt.md | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ nodes/solve/provider_used.json | 5 ++++ nodes/solve/response.md | 16 +++++++++++ nodes/solve/status.json | 6 ++++ 5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) create mode 100644 nodes/solve/prompt.md create mode 100644 nodes/solve/provider_used.json create mode 100644 nodes/solve/response.md create mode 100644 nodes/solve/status.json diff --git a/checkpoint.json b/checkpoint.json index 8f3153b78..a456f1570 100644 --- a/checkpoint.json +++ b/checkpoint.json @@ -1,31 +1,38 @@ { - "timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:32:35.698409Z", - "current_node": "setup", + "timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:35:49.176799Z", + "current_node": "solve", "completed_nodes": [ "start", - "setup" + "setup", + "solve" ], "node_retries": { + "solve": 1, "setup": 1, "start": 1 }, "context_values": { "command.stderr": "", "graph.goal": "Allow ValidationErrors to equal each other when created identically\nDescription\n\t \n\t\t(last modified by kamni)\n\t \nCurrently ValidationErrors (django.core.exceptions.ValidationError) that have identical messages don't equal each other, which is counter-intuitive, and can make certain kinds of testing more complicated. Please add an __eq__ method that allows two ValidationErrors to be compared. \nIdeally, this would be more than just a simple self.messages == other.messages. It would be most helpful if the comparison were independent of the order in which errors were raised in a field or in non_field_errors.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nI probably wouldn't want to limit the comparison to an error's message but rather to its full set of attributes (message, code, params). While params is always pushed into message when iterating over the errors in an ValidationError, I believe it can be beneficial to know if the params that were put inside are the same.\n​PR", + "internal.retry_count.solve": 1, "internal.retry_count.start": 1, "thread.start.current_node": "setup", - "failure_class": "deterministic", + "failure_class": "", "internal.node_visit_count": 1, - "failure_signature": "setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.", - "internal.thread_id": "start", + "failure_signature": "", + "internal.thread_id": "setup", + "thread.setup.current_node": "solve", + "last_stage": "solve", "command.output": "fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n", + "last_response": "The trailing newline diff is just cosmetic. The meaningful change is the addition of three methods to `ValidationError`:\n\n## Summary of Changes\n\n**File**: `django/core/exceptions.py`\n\nAdded three meth", + "response.solve": "The trailing newline diff is just cosmetic. The meaningful change is the addition of three methods to `ValidationError`:\n\n## Summary of Changes\n\n**File**: `django/core/exceptions.py`\n\nAdded three methods to the `ValidationError` class:\n\n1. **`_get_error_key()`** — Returns a hashable, order-independent representation of the error. It handles all three forms of `ValidationError`:\n - **Single message** (has `message` attr): returns `(message, code, params)` tuple, converting dict params to a sorted tuple of items for hashability\n - **Dict of errors** (has `error_dict` attr): returns a sorted tuple of `(field, sorted_errors)` pairs, making comparison independent of field order and error order within each field\n - **List of errors** (has `error_list`): returns a sorted tuple of error keys, making comparison independent of error order\n\n2. **`__eq__(other)`** — Compares two `ValidationError` instances by their error keys. Returns `NotImplemented` for non-`ValidationError` comparisons (proper Python protocol).\n\n3. **`__hash__()`** — Returns the hash of the error key, ensuring that equal `ValidationError` instances have equal hashes (required Python invariant), and making them usable in sets and as dict keys.", "graph.rankdir": "LR", "internal.run_id": "01KKTJ3AHTPXR8PM2P2AA8E7R4", "internal.retry_count.setup": 1, "internal.fidelity": "compact", - "outcome": "fail", - "current.preamble": "Goal: Allow ValidationErrors to equal each other when created identically\nDescription\n\t \n\t\t(last modified by kamni)\n\t \nCurrently ValidationErrors (django.core.exceptions.ValidationError) that have identical messages don't equal each other, which is counter-intuitive, and can make certain kinds of testing more complicated. Please add an __eq__ method that allows two ValidationErrors to be compared. \nIdeally, this would be more than just a simple self.messages == other.messages. It would be most helpful if the comparison were independent of the order in which errors were raised in a field or in non_field_errors.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nI probably wouldn't want to limit the comparison to an error's message but rather to its full set of attributes (message, code, params). While params is always pushed into message when iterating over the errors in an ValidationError, I believe it can be beneficial to know if the params that were put inside are the same.\n​PR\n", - "current_node": "setup" + "outcome": "success", + "current.preamble": "Goal: Allow ValidationErrors to equal each other when created identically\nDescription\n\t \n\t\t(last modified by kamni)\n\t \nCurrently ValidationErrors (django.core.exceptions.ValidationError) that have identical messages don't equal each other, which is counter-intuitive, and can make certain kinds of testing more complicated. Please add an __eq__ method that allows two ValidationErrors to be compared. \nIdeally, this would be more than just a simple self.messages == other.messages. It would be most helpful if the comparison were independent of the order in which errors were raised in a field or in non_field_errors.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nI probably wouldn't want to limit the comparison to an error's message but rather to its full set of attributes (message, code, params). While params is always pushed into message when iterating over the errors in an ValidationError, I believe it can be beneficial to know if the params that were put inside are the same.\n​PR\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 16218c20606d8cd89c5393970c83da04598a3e04 && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n\n## Context\n- failure_class: deterministic\n- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n", + "current_node": "solve" }, "logs": [], "node_outcomes": { @@ -33,6 +40,28 @@ "status": "success", "duration_ms": 0 }, + "solve": { + "status": "success", + "context_updates": { + "last_stage": "solve", + "last_response": "The trailing newline diff is just cosmetic. The meaningful change is the addition of three methods to `ValidationError`:\n\n## Summary of Changes\n\n**File**: `django/core/exceptions.py`\n\nAdded three meth", + "response.solve": "The trailing newline diff is just cosmetic. The meaningful change is the addition of three methods to `ValidationError`:\n\n## Summary of Changes\n\n**File**: `django/core/exceptions.py`\n\nAdded three methods to the `ValidationError` class:\n\n1. **`_get_error_key()`** — Returns a hashable, order-independent representation of the error. It handles all three forms of `ValidationError`:\n - **Single message** (has `message` attr): returns `(message, code, params)` tuple, converting dict params to a sorted tuple of items for hashability\n - **Dict of errors** (has `error_dict` attr): returns a sorted tuple of `(field, sorted_errors)` pairs, making comparison independent of field order and error order within each field\n - **List of errors** (has `error_list`): returns a sorted tuple of error keys, making comparison independent of error order\n\n2. **`__eq__(other)`** — Compares two `ValidationError` instances by their error keys. Returns `NotImplemented` for non-`ValidationError` comparisons (proper Python protocol).\n\n3. **`__hash__()`** — Returns the hash of the error key, ensuring that equal `ValidationError` instances have equal hashes (required Python invariant), and making them usable in sets and as dict keys." + }, + "notes": "Stage completed: solve", + "usage": { + "model": "claude-opus-4-6", + "input_tokens": 19452, + "output_tokens": 8897, + "cache_read_tokens": 368590, + "cache_write_tokens": 30980, + "reasoning_tokens": 1232, + "cost": 0.959055 + }, + "files_touched": [ + "/tmp/django-repo/django/core/exceptions.py" + ], + "duration_ms": 191339 + }, "setup": { "status": "fail", "context_updates": { @@ -46,11 +75,12 @@ "duration_ms": 30 } }, - "next_node_id": "solve", + "next_node_id": "extract_patch", "loop_failure_signatures": { "setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.": 1 }, "node_visits": { + "solve": 1, "start": 1, "setup": 1 } diff --git a/nodes/solve/prompt.md b/nodes/solve/prompt.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e62b335b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/solve/prompt.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +Goal: Allow ValidationErrors to equal each other when created identically +Description + + (last modified by kamni) + +Currently ValidationErrors (django.core.exceptions.ValidationError) that have identical messages don't equal each other, which is counter-intuitive, and can make certain kinds of testing more complicated. Please add an __eq__ method that allows two ValidationErrors to be compared. +Ideally, this would be more than just a simple self.messages == other.messages. It would be most helpful if the comparison were independent of the order in which errors were raised in a field or in non_field_errors. + + + +## Additional Context + +I probably wouldn't want to limit the comparison to an error's message but rather to its full set of attributes (message, code, params). While params is always pushed into message when iterating over the errors in an ValidationError, I believe it can be beneficial to know if the params that were put inside are the same. +​PR + +## Completed stages +- **setup**: fail + - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 16218c20606d8cd89c5393970c83da04598a3e04 && python -m pip install -e .` + - Stdout: + ``` + fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory. + ``` + - Stderr: (empty) + +## Context +- failure_class: deterministic +- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory. + + +Fix this GitHub issue in the repository. Make the minimal code change needed. + +Allow ValidationErrors to equal each other when created identically +Description + + (last modified by kamni) + +Currently ValidationErrors (django.core.exceptions.ValidationError) that have identical messages don't equal each other, which is counter-intuitive, and can make certain kinds of testing more complicated. Please add an __eq__ method that allows two ValidationErrors to be compared. +Ideally, this would be more than just a simple self.messages == other.messages. It would be most helpful if the comparison were independent of the order in which errors were raised in a field or in non_field_errors. + + + +## Additional Context + +I probably wouldn't want to limit the comparison to an error's message but rather to its full set of attributes (message, code, params). While params is always pushed into message when iterating over the errors in an ValidationError, I believe it can be beneficial to know if the params that were put inside are the same. +​PR \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/nodes/solve/provider_used.json b/nodes/solve/provider_used.json new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c1905ff10 --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/solve/provider_used.json @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +{ + "mode": "agent", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-opus-4-6" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/nodes/solve/response.md b/nodes/solve/response.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..246f8c1bd --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/solve/response.md @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +The trailing newline diff is just cosmetic. The meaningful change is the addition of three methods to `ValidationError`: + +## Summary of Changes + +**File**: `django/core/exceptions.py` + +Added three methods to the `ValidationError` class: + +1. **`_get_error_key()`** — Returns a hashable, order-independent representation of the error. It handles all three forms of `ValidationError`: + - **Single message** (has `message` attr): returns `(message, code, params)` tuple, converting dict params to a sorted tuple of items for hashability + - **Dict of errors** (has `error_dict` attr): returns a sorted tuple of `(field, sorted_errors)` pairs, making comparison independent of field order and error order within each field + - **List of errors** (has `error_list`): returns a sorted tuple of error keys, making comparison independent of error order + +2. **`__eq__(other)`** — Compares two `ValidationError` instances by their error keys. Returns `NotImplemented` for non-`ValidationError` comparisons (proper Python protocol). + +3. **`__hash__()`** — Returns the hash of the error key, ensuring that equal `ValidationError` instances have equal hashes (required Python invariant), and making them usable in sets and as dict keys. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/nodes/solve/status.json b/nodes/solve/status.json new file mode 100644 index 000000000..23a3d5a3f --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/solve/status.json @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +{ + "status": "success", + "notes": "Stage completed: solve", + "failure_reason": null, + "timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:35:49.176599+00:00" +} \ No newline at end of file