diff --git a/graph.fabro b/graph.fabro
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..36ebbc411
--- /dev/null
+++ b/graph.fabro
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+digraph SWEBench {
+    rankdir=LR
+    start [shape=Mdiamond]
+    exit  [shape=Msquare]
+    setup         [label="Setup", shape=parallelogram, script="git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout d232fd76a85870daf345fd8f8d617fe7802ae194 && python -m pip install -e ."]
+    solve         [label="Solve", prompt="Fix this GitHub issue in the repository. Make the minimal code change needed."]
+    extract_patch [label="Extract Patch", shape=parallelogram, script="git diff"]
+    start -> setup -> solve -> extract_patch -> exit
+}
diff --git a/manifest.json b/manifest.json
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8a164ad51
--- /dev/null
+++ b/manifest.json
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "run_id": "01KKV8RZMG00PMJEH60S957SFP",
+  "workflow_name": "SWEBench",
+  "goal": "ForeignKey's to_field parameter gets the old field's name when renaming a PrimaryKey.\nDescription\n\t\nHaving these two models \nclass ModelA(models.Model):\n\tfield_wrong = models.CharField('field1', max_length=50, primary_key=True) # I'm a Primary key.\nclass ModelB(models.Model):\n\tfield_fk = models.ForeignKey(ModelA, blank=True, null=True, on_delete=models.CASCADE) \n... migrations applyed ...\nthe ModelA.field_wrong field has been renamed ... and Django recognizes the \"renaming\"\n# Primary key renamed\nclass ModelA(models.Model):\n\tfield_fixed = models.CharField('field1', max_length=50, primary_key=True) # I'm a Primary key.\nAttempts to to_field parameter. \nThe to_field points to the old_name (field_typo) and not to the new one (\"field_fixed\")\nclass Migration(migrations.Migration):\n\tdependencies = [\n\t\t('app1', '0001_initial'),\n\t]\n\toperations = [\n\t\tmigrations.RenameField(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='modela',\n\t\t\told_name='field_wrong',\n\t\t\tnew_name='field_fixed',\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AlterField(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='modelb',\n\t\t\tname='modela',\n\t\t\tfield=models.ForeignKey(blank=True, null=True, on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, to='app1.ModelB', to_field='field_wrong'),\n\t\t),\n\t]\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nThanks for this ticket. It looks like a regression in dcdd219ee1e062dc6189f382e0298e0adf5d5ddf, because an AlterField operation wasn't generated in such cases before this change (and I don't think we need it).",
+  "start_time": "2026-03-16T12:08:54.571461Z",
+  "node_count": 5,
+  "edge_count": 4,
+  "run_branch": "fabro/run/01KKV8RZMG00PMJEH60S957SFP",
+  "base_sha": "470fcfe1200b2102c0cdf91c73b0ed8d925f258a",
+  "base_branch": "main",
+  "workflow_slug": "django__django-11910",
+  "host_repo_path": "/Users/bhelmkamp/p/fabro-sh/fabro/evals/swe-bench/results/gemini-baseline/runs/django__django-11910"
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/sandbox.json b/sandbox.json
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..608e58c7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sandbox.json
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "provider": "daytona",
+  "working_directory": "/home/daytona/workspace",
+  "identifier": "fabro-01KKV8RZMG00PMJEH60S957SFP"
+}
\ No newline at end of file