checkpoint

⚒️ Generated with [Fabro](https://fabro.sh)

checkpoint.json

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+{
+  "timestamp": "2026-03-16T11:59:54.977272Z",
+  "current_node": "setup",
+  "completed_nodes": [
+    "start",
+    "setup"
+  ],
+  "node_retries": {
+    "setup": 1,
+    "start": 1
+  },
+  "context_values": {
+    "command.stderr": "",
+    "graph.rankdir": "LR",
+    "command.output": "fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
+    "thread.start.current_node": "setup",
+    "outcome": "fail",
+    "current.preamble": "Goal: HttpResponse doesn't handle memoryview objects\nDescription\n\t\nI am trying to write a BinaryField retrieved from the database into a HttpResponse. When the database is Sqlite this works correctly, but Postgresql returns the contents of the field as a memoryview object and it seems like current Django doesn't like this combination:\nfrom django.http import HttpResponse\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n# String content\nresponse = HttpResponse(\"My Content\")\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\nresponse.content\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n# Out: b'My Content'\n# This is correct\n# Bytes content\nresponse = HttpResponse(b\"My Content\")\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \nresponse.content\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n# Out: b'My Content'\n# This is also correct\n# memoryview content\nresponse = HttpResponse(memoryview(b\"My Content\"))\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \nresponse.content\n# Out: b'<memory at 0x7fcc47ab2648>'\n# This is not correct, I am expecting b'My Content'\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nI guess HttpResponseBase.make_bytes ​could be adapted to deal with memoryview objects by casting them to bytes. In all cases simply wrapping the memoryview in bytes works as a workaround HttpResponse(bytes(model.binary_field)).\nThe fact make_bytes would still use force_bytes if da56e1bac6449daef9aeab8d076d2594d9fd5b44 didn't refactor it and that d680a3f4477056c69629b0421db4bb254b8c69d0 added memoryview support to force_bytes strengthen my assumption that make_bytes should be adjusted as well.\nI'll try to work on this.\n",
+    "internal.retry_count.setup": 1,
+    "internal.thread_id": "start",
+    "internal.fidelity": "compact",
+    "internal.run_id": "01KKV88GXN6R8JTAX6N2MP5YET",
+    "failure_signature": "setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.",
+    "internal.node_visit_count": 1,
+    "graph.goal": "HttpResponse doesn't handle memoryview objects\nDescription\n\t\nI am trying to write a BinaryField retrieved from the database into a HttpResponse. When the database is Sqlite this works correctly, but Postgresql returns the contents of the field as a memoryview object and it seems like current Django doesn't like this combination:\nfrom django.http import HttpResponse\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n# String content\nresponse = HttpResponse(\"My Content\")\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\nresponse.content\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n# Out: b'My Content'\n# This is correct\n# Bytes content\nresponse = HttpResponse(b\"My Content\")\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \nresponse.content\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n# Out: b'My Content'\n# This is also correct\n# memoryview content\nresponse = HttpResponse(memoryview(b\"My Content\"))\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \nresponse.content\n# Out: b'<memory at 0x7fcc47ab2648>'\n# This is not correct, I am expecting b'My Content'\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nI guess HttpResponseBase.make_bytes ​could be adapted to deal with memoryview objects by casting them to bytes. In all cases simply wrapping the memoryview in bytes works as a workaround HttpResponse(bytes(model.binary_field)).\nThe fact make_bytes would still use force_bytes if da56e1bac6449daef9aeab8d076d2594d9fd5b44 didn't refactor it and that d680a3f4477056c69629b0421db4bb254b8c69d0 added memoryview support to force_bytes strengthen my assumption that make_bytes should be adjusted as well.\nI'll try to work on this.",
+    "failure_class": "deterministic",
+    "current_node": "setup",
+    "internal.retry_count.start": 1
+  },
+  "logs": [],
+  "node_outcomes": {
+    "start": {
+      "status": "success",
+      "duration_ms": 0
+    },
+    "setup": {
+      "status": "fail",
+      "context_updates": {
+        "command.output": "fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
+        "command.stderr": ""
+      },
+      "failure": {
+        "message": "Script failed with exit code: 128\n\n## stdout\nfatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
+        "failure_class": "deterministic"
+      },
+      "duration_ms": 46
+    }
+  },
+  "next_node_id": "solve",
+  "loop_failure_signatures": {
+    "setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.": 1
+  },
+  "node_visits": {
+    "setup": 1,
+    "start": 1
+  }
+}

nodes/setup/script_invocation.json

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "command": "git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 879cc3da6249e920b8d54518a0ae06de835d7373 && python -m pip install -e .",
+  "language": "shell",
+  "timeout_ms": null
+}

nodes/setup/script_timing.json

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "duration_ms": 46,
+  "exit_code": 128,
+  "timed_out": false
+}

nodes/setup/status.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "status": "fail",
+  "notes": null,
+  "failure_reason": "Script failed with exit code: 128\n\n## stdout\nfatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
+  "timestamp": "2026-03-16T11:59:54.977086+00:00"
+}

nodes/start/status.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "status": "success",
+  "notes": null,
+  "failure_reason": null,
+  "timestamp": "2026-03-16T11:59:54.929024+00:00"
+}