diff --git a/checkpoint.json b/checkpoint.json index 1baba712e..f81ef76f7 100644 --- a/checkpoint.json +++ b/checkpoint.json @@ -1,31 +1,35 @@ { - "timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:34:16.657963Z", - "current_node": "solve", + "timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:34:19.850325Z", + "current_node": "extract_patch", "completed_nodes": [ "start", "setup", - "solve" + "solve", + "extract_patch" ], "node_retries": { "start": 1, "setup": 1, + "extract_patch": 1, "solve": 4 }, "context_values": { - "command.output": "fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n", - "outcome": "fail", + "command.output": "", + "outcome": "success", + "internal.retry_count.extract_patch": 1, "internal.retry_count.setup": 1, "graph.goal": "AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index().\nDescription\n\t\n\tclass Meta:\n\t\tdb_table = 'look_image'\n\t\torder_with_respect_to = 'look'\n\t\tindexes = [\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['look', '_order']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['created_at']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['updated_at']),\n\t\t]\nmigrations.CreateModel(\n\t\t\tname='LookImage',\n\t\t\tfields=[\n\t\t\t\t('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),\n\t\t\t\t('look', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, related_name='images', to='posts.Look', verbose_name='LOOK')),\n\t\t\t\t('image_url', models.URLField(blank=True, max_length=10000, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('image', models.ImageField(max_length=2000, upload_to='')),\n\t\t\t\t('deleted', models.DateTimeField(editable=False, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)),\n\t\t\t],\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['look', '_order'], name='look_image_look_id_eaff30_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['created_at'], name='look_image_created_f746cf_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['updated_at'], name='look_image_updated_aceaf9_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AlterOrderWithRespectTo(\n\t\t\tname='lookimage',\n\t\t\torder_with_respect_to='look',\n\t\t),\nI added orders_with_respect_to in new model class's Meta class and also made index for '_order' field by combining with other field. And a new migration file based on the model looks like the code above.\nThe problem is operation AlterOrderWithRespectTo after AddIndex of '_order' raising error because '_order' field had not been created yet.\nIt seems to be AlterOrderWithRespectTo has to proceed before AddIndex of '_order'.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nThanks for this report. IMO order_with_respect_to should be included in CreateModel()'s options, I'm not sure why it is in a separate operation when it refers to a ForeignKey.\nI reproduced the issue adding order_with_respect_to and indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] at the same time to an existent model. class Meta: order_with_respect_to = 'foo' indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] A small broken test: ​https://github.com/iurisilvio/django/commit/5c6504e67f1d2749efd13daca440dfa54708a4b2 I'll try to fix the issue, but I'm not sure the way to fix it. Can we reorder autodetected migrations?\n​PR", "thread.setup.current_node": "solve", - "failure_signature": "solve|transient_infra|api_transient|gemini|rate_limited", + "failure_signature": "", "internal.retry_count.solve": 4, - "current_node": "solve", - "failure_class": "transient_infra", - "internal.thread_id": "setup", + "thread.solve.current_node": "extract_patch", + "current_node": "extract_patch", + "failure_class": "", + "internal.thread_id": "solve", "internal.run_id": "01KKTJ3GC8EGWBCAQGA9V9QN7M", "internal.fidelity": "compact", "internal.retry_count.start": 1, - "current.preamble": "Goal: AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index().\nDescription\n\t\n\tclass Meta:\n\t\tdb_table = 'look_image'\n\t\torder_with_respect_to = 'look'\n\t\tindexes = [\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['look', '_order']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['created_at']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['updated_at']),\n\t\t]\nmigrations.CreateModel(\n\t\t\tname='LookImage',\n\t\t\tfields=[\n\t\t\t\t('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),\n\t\t\t\t('look', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, related_name='images', to='posts.Look', verbose_name='LOOK')),\n\t\t\t\t('image_url', models.URLField(blank=True, max_length=10000, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('image', models.ImageField(max_length=2000, upload_to='')),\n\t\t\t\t('deleted', models.DateTimeField(editable=False, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)),\n\t\t\t],\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['look', '_order'], name='look_image_look_id_eaff30_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['created_at'], name='look_image_created_f746cf_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['updated_at'], name='look_image_updated_aceaf9_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AlterOrderWithRespectTo(\n\t\t\tname='lookimage',\n\t\t\torder_with_respect_to='look',\n\t\t),\nI added orders_with_respect_to in new model class's Meta class and also made index for '_order' field by combining with other field. And a new migration file based on the model looks like the code above.\nThe problem is operation AlterOrderWithRespectTo after AddIndex of '_order' raising error because '_order' field had not been created yet.\nIt seems to be AlterOrderWithRespectTo has to proceed before AddIndex of '_order'.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nThanks for this report. IMO order_with_respect_to should be included in CreateModel()'s options, I'm not sure why it is in a separate operation when it refers to a ForeignKey.\nI reproduced the issue adding order_with_respect_to and indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] at the same time to an existent model. class Meta: order_with_respect_to = 'foo' indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] A small broken test: ​https://github.com/iurisilvio/django/commit/5c6504e67f1d2749efd13daca440dfa54708a4b2 I'll try to fix the issue, but I'm not sure the way to fix it. Can we reorder autodetected migrations?\n​PR\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout b2b0711b555fa292751763c2df4fe577c396f265 && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n\n## Context\n- failure_class: deterministic\n- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n", + "current.preamble": "Goal: AlterOrderWithRespectTo() with ForeignKey crash when _order is included in Index().\nDescription\n\t\n\tclass Meta:\n\t\tdb_table = 'look_image'\n\t\torder_with_respect_to = 'look'\n\t\tindexes = [\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['look', '_order']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['created_at']),\n\t\t\tmodels.Index(fields=['updated_at']),\n\t\t]\nmigrations.CreateModel(\n\t\t\tname='LookImage',\n\t\t\tfields=[\n\t\t\t\t('id', models.AutoField(auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID')),\n\t\t\t\t('look', models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.CASCADE, related_name='images', to='posts.Look', verbose_name='LOOK')),\n\t\t\t\t('image_url', models.URLField(blank=True, max_length=10000, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('image', models.ImageField(max_length=2000, upload_to='')),\n\t\t\t\t('deleted', models.DateTimeField(editable=False, null=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('created_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),\n\t\t\t\t('updated_at', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)),\n\t\t\t],\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['look', '_order'], name='look_image_look_id_eaff30_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['created_at'], name='look_image_created_f746cf_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AddIndex(\n\t\t\tmodel_name='lookimage',\n\t\t\tindex=models.Index(fields=['updated_at'], name='look_image_updated_aceaf9_idx'),\n\t\t),\n\t\tmigrations.AlterOrderWithRespectTo(\n\t\t\tname='lookimage',\n\t\t\torder_with_respect_to='look',\n\t\t),\nI added orders_with_respect_to in new model class's Meta class and also made index for '_order' field by combining with other field. And a new migration file based on the model looks like the code above.\nThe problem is operation AlterOrderWithRespectTo after AddIndex of '_order' raising error because '_order' field had not been created yet.\nIt seems to be AlterOrderWithRespectTo has to proceed before AddIndex of '_order'.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nThanks for this report. IMO order_with_respect_to should be included in CreateModel()'s options, I'm not sure why it is in a separate operation when it refers to a ForeignKey.\nI reproduced the issue adding order_with_respect_to and indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] at the same time to an existent model. class Meta: order_with_respect_to = 'foo' indexes = [models.Index(fields='_order')] A small broken test: ​https://github.com/iurisilvio/django/commit/5c6504e67f1d2749efd13daca440dfa54708a4b2 I'll try to fix the issue, but I'm not sure the way to fix it. Can we reorder autodetected migrations?\n​PR\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout b2b0711b555fa292751763c2df4fe577c396f265 && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n- **solve**: fail\n\n## Context\n- failure_class: transient_infra\n- failure_signature: solve|transient_infra|api_transient|gemini|rate_limited\n", "command.stderr": "", "thread.start.current_node": "setup", "internal.node_visit_count": 1, @@ -33,6 +37,24 @@ }, "logs": [], "node_outcomes": { + "solve": { + "status": "fail", + "failure": { + "message": "LLM error: Rate limited by gemini: You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, head to: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits. To monitor your current usage, head to: https://ai.dev/rate-limit. \n* Quota exceeded for metric: generativelanguage.googleapis.com/generate_requests_per_model, limit: 25, model: gemini-3.1-pro\nPlease retry in 43.368975427s.", + "failure_class": "transient_infra", + "failure_signature": "api_transient|gemini|rate_limited" + }, + "duration_ms": 89543 + }, + "extract_patch": { + "status": "success", + "context_updates": { + "command.output": "", + "command.stderr": "" + }, + "notes": "Script completed: git diff", + "duration_ms": 90 + }, "start": { "status": "success", "duration_ms": 0 @@ -48,24 +70,16 @@ "failure_class": "deterministic" }, "duration_ms": 218 - }, - "solve": { - "status": "fail", - "failure": { - "message": "LLM error: Rate limited by gemini: You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, head to: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits. To monitor your current usage, head to: https://ai.dev/rate-limit. \n* Quota exceeded for metric: generativelanguage.googleapis.com/generate_requests_per_model, limit: 25, model: gemini-3.1-pro\nPlease retry in 43.368975427s.", - "failure_class": "transient_infra", - "failure_signature": "api_transient|gemini|rate_limited" - }, - "duration_ms": 89543 } }, - "next_node_id": "extract_patch", + "next_node_id": "exit", "loop_failure_signatures": { "setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.": 1 }, "node_visits": { "start": 1, - "solve": 1, - "setup": 1 + "extract_patch": 1, + "setup": 1, + "solve": 1 } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json b/nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6d29afc80 --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +{ + "command": "git diff", + "language": "shell", + "timeout_ms": null +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json b/nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e9836e937 --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +{ + "duration_ms": 88, + "exit_code": 0, + "timed_out": false +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/nodes/extract_patch/status.json b/nodes/extract_patch/status.json new file mode 100644 index 000000000..956a4a058 --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/extract_patch/status.json @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +{ + "status": "success", + "notes": "Script completed: git diff", + "failure_reason": null, + "timestamp": "2026-03-16T05:34:19.849169+00:00" +} \ No newline at end of file