From 15107dc4a77b442af66de3e97420c4471ef29c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fabro Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:08:31 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] checkpoint MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ⚒️ Generated with [Fabro](https://fabro.sh) --- checkpoint.json | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- nodes/solve/prompt.md | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ nodes/solve/status.json | 6 ++++++ 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) create mode 100644 nodes/solve/prompt.md create mode 100644 nodes/solve/status.json diff --git a/checkpoint.json b/checkpoint.json index 039e1df40..af6d22563 100644 --- a/checkpoint.json +++ b/checkpoint.json @@ -1,28 +1,32 @@ { - "timestamp": "2026-03-16T12:07:17.706822Z", - "current_node": "setup", + "timestamp": "2026-03-16T12:08:31.532111Z", + "current_node": "solve", "completed_nodes": [ "start", - "setup" + "setup", + "solve" ], "node_retries": { "setup": 1, - "start": 1 + "start": 1, + "solve": 4 }, "context_values": { "internal.fidelity": "compact", + "thread.setup.current_node": "solve", "graph.goal": "delete() on instances of models without any dependencies doesn't clear PKs.\nDescription\n\t\nDeleting any model with no dependencies not updates the PK on the model. It should be set to None after .delete() call.\nSee Django.db.models.deletion:276-281. Should update the model line 280.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nReproduced at 1ffddfc233e2d5139cc6ec31a4ec6ef70b10f87f. Regression in bc7dd8490b882b2cefdc7faf431dc64c532b79c9. Thanks for the report.\nRegression test.\nI have attached a simple fix which mimics what ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/deletion.py#L324-L326 does for multiple objects. I am not sure if we need ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/deletion.py#L320-L323 (the block above) because I think field_updates is only ever filled if the objects are not fast-deletable -- ie ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/deletion.py#L224 is not called due to the can_fast_delete check at the beginning of the collect function. That said, if we want to be extra \"safe\" we can just move lines 320 - 326 into an extra function and call that from the old and new location (though I do not think it is needed).", + "internal.retry_count.solve": 4, "internal.retry_count.setup": 1, - "failure_signature": "setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.", + "failure_signature": "solve|transient_infra|api_transient|gemini|rate_limited", "command.output": "fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n", "outcome": "fail", - "current_node": "setup", + "current_node": "solve", "internal.run_id": "01KKV8P0V6EWGEXMEQ40SKD40F", - "failure_class": "deterministic", + "failure_class": "transient_infra", "graph.rankdir": "LR", - "current.preamble": "Goal: delete() on instances of models without any dependencies doesn't clear PKs.\nDescription\n\t\nDeleting any model with no dependencies not updates the PK on the model. It should be set to None after .delete() call.\nSee Django.db.models.deletion:276-281. Should update the model line 280.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nReproduced at 1ffddfc233e2d5139cc6ec31a4ec6ef70b10f87f. Regression in bc7dd8490b882b2cefdc7faf431dc64c532b79c9. Thanks for the report.\nRegression test.\nI have attached a simple fix which mimics what ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/deletion.py#L324-L326 does for multiple objects. I am not sure if we need ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/deletion.py#L320-L323 (the block above) because I think field_updates is only ever filled if the objects are not fast-deletable -- ie ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/deletion.py#L224 is not called due to the can_fast_delete check at the beginning of the collect function. That said, if we want to be extra \"safe\" we can just move lines 320 - 326 into an extra function and call that from the old and new location (though I do not think it is needed).\n", + "current.preamble": "Goal: delete() on instances of models without any dependencies doesn't clear PKs.\nDescription\n\t\nDeleting any model with no dependencies not updates the PK on the model. It should be set to None after .delete() call.\nSee Django.db.models.deletion:276-281. Should update the model line 280.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nReproduced at 1ffddfc233e2d5139cc6ec31a4ec6ef70b10f87f. Regression in bc7dd8490b882b2cefdc7faf431dc64c532b79c9. Thanks for the report.\nRegression test.\nI have attached a simple fix which mimics what ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/deletion.py#L324-L326 does for multiple objects. I am not sure if we need ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/deletion.py#L320-L323 (the block above) because I think field_updates is only ever filled if the objects are not fast-deletable -- ie ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/deletion.py#L224 is not called due to the can_fast_delete check at the beginning of the collect function. That said, if we want to be extra \"safe\" we can just move lines 320 - 326 into an extra function and call that from the old and new location (though I do not think it is needed).\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 19fc6376ce67d01ca37a91ef2f55ef769f50513a && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n\n## Context\n- failure_class: deterministic\n- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n", "command.stderr": "", - "internal.thread_id": "start", + "internal.thread_id": "setup", "internal.retry_count.start": 1, "internal.node_visit_count": 1, "thread.start.current_node": "setup" @@ -44,13 +48,23 @@ "start": { "status": "success", "duration_ms": 0 + }, + "solve": { + "status": "fail", + "failure": { + "message": "LLM error: Rate limited by gemini: You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, head to: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits. To monitor your current usage, head to: https://ai.dev/rate-limit. \n* Quota exceeded for metric: generativelanguage.googleapis.com/generate_requests_per_model_per_day, limit: 250, model: gemini-3.1-pro\nPlease retry in 11h51m28.469711808s.", + "failure_class": "transient_infra", + "failure_signature": "api_transient|gemini|rate_limited" + }, + "duration_ms": 71413 } }, - "next_node_id": "solve", + "next_node_id": "extract_patch", "loop_failure_signatures": { "setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.": 1 }, "node_visits": { + "solve": 1, "setup": 1, "start": 1 } diff --git a/nodes/solve/prompt.md b/nodes/solve/prompt.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..43ec2a70e --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/solve/prompt.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +Goal: delete() on instances of models without any dependencies doesn't clear PKs. +Description + +Deleting any model with no dependencies not updates the PK on the model. It should be set to None after .delete() call. +See Django.db.models.deletion:276-281. Should update the model line 280. + + + +## Additional Context + +Reproduced at 1ffddfc233e2d5139cc6ec31a4ec6ef70b10f87f. Regression in bc7dd8490b882b2cefdc7faf431dc64c532b79c9. Thanks for the report. +Regression test. +I have attached a simple fix which mimics what ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/deletion.py#L324-L326 does for multiple objects. I am not sure if we need ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/deletion.py#L320-L323 (the block above) because I think field_updates is only ever filled if the objects are not fast-deletable -- ie ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/db/models/deletion.py#L224 is not called due to the can_fast_delete check at the beginning of the collect function. That said, if we want to be extra "safe" we can just move lines 320 - 326 into an extra function and call that from the old and new location (though I do not think it is needed). + +## Completed stages +- **setup**: fail + - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout 19fc6376ce67d01ca37a91ef2f55ef769f50513a && python -m pip install -e .` + - Stdout: + ``` + fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory. + ``` + - Stderr: (empty) + +## Context +- failure_class: deterministic +- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory. + + +Fix this GitHub issue in the repository. Make the minimal code change needed. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/nodes/solve/status.json b/nodes/solve/status.json new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5bff55c48 --- /dev/null +++ b/nodes/solve/status.json @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +{ + "status": "fail", + "notes": null, + "failure_reason": "LLM error: Rate limited by gemini: You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, head to: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits. To monitor your current usage, head to: https://ai.dev/rate-limit. \n* Quota exceeded for metric: generativelanguage.googleapis.com/generate_requests_per_model_per_day, limit: 250, model: gemini-3.1-pro\nPlease retry in 11h51m28.469711808s.", + "timestamp": "2026-03-16T12:08:31.531850+00:00" +} \ No newline at end of file