mirror of
https://github.com/fabro-sh/fabro.git
synced 2026-09-06 08:18:58 +00:00
Fabro
parent
f4caa04523
commit
0e8a2cbee5
4 changed files with 38 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -1,34 +1,38 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T11:58:37.879496Z",
|
||||
"current_node": "solve",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T11:58:40.182439Z",
|
||||
"current_node": "extract_patch",
|
||||
"completed_nodes": [
|
||||
"start",
|
||||
"setup",
|
||||
"solve"
|
||||
"solve",
|
||||
"extract_patch"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"node_retries": {
|
||||
"extract_patch": 1,
|
||||
"solve": 1,
|
||||
"start": 1,
|
||||
"setup": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"context_values": {
|
||||
"internal.retry_count.setup": 1,
|
||||
"command.output": "fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
|
||||
"current_node": "solve",
|
||||
"command.output": "",
|
||||
"current_node": "extract_patch",
|
||||
"failure_signature": "",
|
||||
"thread.start.current_node": "setup",
|
||||
"outcome": "success",
|
||||
"thread.solve.current_node": "extract_patch",
|
||||
"internal.node_visit_count": 1,
|
||||
"graph.goal": "sqlmigrate wraps it's outpout in BEGIN/COMMIT even if the database doesn't support transactional DDL\nDescription\n\t \n\t\t(last modified by Simon Charette)\n\t \nThe migration executor only adds the outer BEGIN/COMMIT if the migration is atomic and the schema editor can rollback DDL but the current sqlmigrate logic only takes migration.atomic into consideration.\nThe issue can be addressed by\nChanging sqlmigrate assignment of self.output_transaction to consider connection.features.can_rollback_ddl as well.\nAdding a test in tests/migrations/test_commands.py based on an existing test for non-atomic migrations that mocks connection.features.can_rollback_ddl to False instead of overdidding MIGRATION_MODULES to point to a non-atomic migration.\nI marked the ticket as easy picking because I included the above guidelines but feel free to uncheck it if you deem it inappropriate.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nI marked the ticket as easy picking because I included the above guidelines but feel free to uncheck it if you deem it inappropriate. Super. We don't have enough Easy Pickings tickets for the demand, so this kind of thing is great. (IMO 🙂)\nHey, I'm working on this ticket, I would like you to know as this is my first ticket it may take little longer to complete :). Here is a | link to the working branch You may feel free to post references or elaborate more on the topic.\nHi Parth. No problem. If you need help please reach out to e.g. django-core-mentorship citing this issue, and where you've got to/got stuck. Welcome aboard, and have fun! ✨",
|
||||
"internal.retry_count.start": 1,
|
||||
"current.preamble": "Goal: sqlmigrate wraps it's outpout in BEGIN/COMMIT even if the database doesn't support transactional DDL\nDescription\n\t \n\t\t(last modified by Simon Charette)\n\t \nThe migration executor only adds the outer BEGIN/COMMIT if the migration is atomic and the schema editor can rollback DDL but the current sqlmigrate logic only takes migration.atomic into consideration.\nThe issue can be addressed by\nChanging sqlmigrate assignment of self.output_transaction to consider connection.features.can_rollback_ddl as well.\nAdding a test in tests/migrations/test_commands.py based on an existing test for non-atomic migrations that mocks connection.features.can_rollback_ddl to False instead of overdidding MIGRATION_MODULES to point to a non-atomic migration.\nI marked the ticket as easy picking because I included the above guidelines but feel free to uncheck it if you deem it inappropriate.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nI marked the ticket as easy picking because I included the above guidelines but feel free to uncheck it if you deem it inappropriate. Super. We don't have enough Easy Pickings tickets for the demand, so this kind of thing is great. (IMO 🙂)\nHey, I'm working on this ticket, I would like you to know as this is my first ticket it may take little longer to complete :). Here is a | link to the working branch You may feel free to post references or elaborate more on the topic.\nHi Parth. No problem. If you need help please reach out to e.g. django-core-mentorship citing this issue, and where you've got to/got stuck. Welcome aboard, and have fun! ✨\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout d5276398046ce4a102776a1e67dcac2884d80dfe && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n\n## Context\n- failure_class: deterministic\n- failure_signature: setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n",
|
||||
"current.preamble": "Goal: sqlmigrate wraps it's outpout in BEGIN/COMMIT even if the database doesn't support transactional DDL\nDescription\n\t \n\t\t(last modified by Simon Charette)\n\t \nThe migration executor only adds the outer BEGIN/COMMIT if the migration is atomic and the schema editor can rollback DDL but the current sqlmigrate logic only takes migration.atomic into consideration.\nThe issue can be addressed by\nChanging sqlmigrate assignment of self.output_transaction to consider connection.features.can_rollback_ddl as well.\nAdding a test in tests/migrations/test_commands.py based on an existing test for non-atomic migrations that mocks connection.features.can_rollback_ddl to False instead of overdidding MIGRATION_MODULES to point to a non-atomic migration.\nI marked the ticket as easy picking because I included the above guidelines but feel free to uncheck it if you deem it inappropriate.\n\n\n\n## Additional Context\n\nI marked the ticket as easy picking because I included the above guidelines but feel free to uncheck it if you deem it inappropriate. Super. We don't have enough Easy Pickings tickets for the demand, so this kind of thing is great. (IMO 🙂)\nHey, I'm working on this ticket, I would like you to know as this is my first ticket it may take little longer to complete :). Here is a | link to the working branch You may feel free to post references or elaborate more on the topic.\nHi Parth. No problem. If you need help please reach out to e.g. django-core-mentorship citing this issue, and where you've got to/got stuck. Welcome aboard, and have fun! ✨\n\n## Completed stages\n- **setup**: fail\n - Script: `git clone https://github.com/django/django.git . && git checkout d5276398046ce4a102776a1e67dcac2884d80dfe && python -m pip install -e .`\n - Stdout:\n ```\n fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.\n ```\n - Stderr: (empty)\n- **solve**: success\n - Model: claude-haiku-4-5, 6.0k tokens in / 2.2k out\n",
|
||||
"command.stderr": "",
|
||||
"internal.retry_count.solve": 1,
|
||||
"response.solve": "**Summary:**\n\nThe issue provided is about fixing a Django issue related to sqlmigrate and transactional DDL. However, this workspace is for the **Fabro** project (an AI-powered workflow orchestration platform), not Django.\n\nThe setup failure occurred because a workflow script tried to clone the Django repository into the current directory (`.`), but the directory already contains the Fabro repository.\n\n**The actual issue here is a mismatch:** The task description is about fixing a Django GitHub issue, but the repository is Fabro. These are two completely different projects.\n\nTo proceed, I need clarification:\n1. **Should I be fixing a Django issue?** If so, the proper approach would be to create a proper setup that clones Django into a clean or separate directory.\n2. **Should I be fixing something in the Fabro codebase?** If so, I need to know what the actual issue is.\n\nCould you clarify which repository/issue I should be working on? The GitHub issue description provided is clearly about Django's migration system, but this workspace contains the Fabro project.",
|
||||
"graph.rankdir": "LR",
|
||||
"last_stage": "solve",
|
||||
"last_response": "**Summary:**\n\nThe issue provided is about fixing a Django issue related to sqlmigrate and transactional DDL. However, this workspace is for the **Fabro** project (an AI-powered workflow orchestration ",
|
||||
"internal.thread_id": "setup",
|
||||
"internal.thread_id": "solve",
|
||||
"internal.retry_count.extract_patch": 1,
|
||||
"internal.run_id": "01KKV856ZEEJBGC9X1QV8XSVEP",
|
||||
"thread.setup.current_node": "solve",
|
||||
"failure_class": "",
|
||||
|
|
@ -52,6 +56,15 @@
|
|||
},
|
||||
"duration_ms": 28
|
||||
},
|
||||
"extract_patch": {
|
||||
"status": "success",
|
||||
"context_updates": {
|
||||
"command.stderr": "",
|
||||
"command.output": ""
|
||||
},
|
||||
"notes": "Script completed: git diff",
|
||||
"duration_ms": 30
|
||||
},
|
||||
"solve": {
|
||||
"status": "success",
|
||||
"context_updates": {
|
||||
|
|
@ -71,11 +84,12 @@
|
|||
"duration_ms": 27961
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"next_node_id": "extract_patch",
|
||||
"next_node_id": "exit",
|
||||
"loop_failure_signatures": {
|
||||
"setup|deterministic|script failed with exit code: <n> ## stdout fatal: destination path '.' already exists and is not an empty directory.": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"node_visits": {
|
||||
"extract_patch": 1,
|
||||
"setup": 1,
|
||||
"solve": 1,
|
||||
"start": 1
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
5
nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json
Normal file
5
nodes/extract_patch/script_invocation.json
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"command": "git diff",
|
||||
"language": "shell",
|
||||
"timeout_ms": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
5
nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json
Normal file
5
nodes/extract_patch/script_timing.json
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"duration_ms": 28,
|
||||
"exit_code": 0,
|
||||
"timed_out": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
6
nodes/extract_patch/status.json
Normal file
6
nodes/extract_patch/status.json
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"status": "success",
|
||||
"notes": "Script completed: git diff",
|
||||
"failure_reason": null,
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T11:58:40.181425+00:00"
|
||||
}
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue