# Spend Management Canon

The authoritative literature on procurement spend management, category strategy, and supplier rationalization. Read these before opening the categorizer or consolidation planner — most "spend audits" fail because they categorize by supplier name instead of by what's purchased, miss the Pareto, or rationalize without measuring switching cost.

---

## Sources (≥ 7)

### 1. A.T. Kearney — *Assessment of Excellence in Procurement (AEP)*

A.T. Kearney's biennial AEP benchmark is the longest-running cross-industry procurement maturity study (1992–present). Key findings relevant to this skill:

- **Top-quartile procurement orgs deliver 7-15× ROI** vs. their function spend, driven primarily by *category strategy* rather than negotiation tactics.
- **Maverick spend** (purchases bypassing approved suppliers) averages 10-40% of indirect spend in unmonitored companies and is the #1 leakage point.
- **Category architecture** (the taxonomy you categorize against) is the foundation; without it, you cannot find the Pareto.

Use when: justifying a spend audit to leadership ("here's why this matters"), defending a category taxonomy investment.

### 2. Pierre Mitchell / Spend Matters — Category strategy and supplier rationalization research

Pierre Mitchell at Spend Matters is the most-cited practitioner on category strategy mechanics. Key principles:

- **Categorize by what's purchased, not by who provided it.** Workday spans HR (HRIS) and Finance (HCM/Payroll) — splitting it correctly changes the category Pareto.
- **Supplier rationalization is a 3-step decision:** (1) keep / consolidate / kill, (2) negotiate / re-bid / status-quo, (3) automate / manual. Most teams collapse these into one decision and get it wrong.
- **The "right number of suppliers" question is wrong.** The right question is: what's the marginal cost of adding the Nth supplier in this category?

### 3. Hackett Group — *Procurement Performance Study* (annual)

The Hackett Group benchmarks procurement org performance on cost-to-serve, cycle time, and savings yield. Key benchmarks:

- **World-class procurement orgs have 26% lower process cost per PO** than peers — driven by automation of low-risk categories (catalog buys) so judgment is reserved for high-risk ones.
- **Purchasing cycle median** (request → PO) is 3-7 days for catalog items and 21-90+ days for negotiated services. The skill's bottleneck flag uses 2× median because real cycle distributions are highly skewed.
- **Approver-hop reduction** is the highest-ROI process intervention: most companies route every $5k+ purchase through 3-5 approvers; world-class routes by category risk, not dollar value.

### 4. BCG — *The CPO Agenda: Driving Value Through Procurement* (multi-year series)

BCG's procurement value-creation research emphasizes:

- **Category-led negotiation** delivers 2-3× the savings of supplier-led negotiation (because category strategy gives you the BATNA).
- **Supplier consolidation risk:** BCG's case studies of failed consolidations show that 30-50% of theoretical savings disappear due to: (a) underestimated migration cost, (b) loss of competitive tension, (c) single-source operational risk. The skill's hard refusal to consolidate tier-1 to single-source without break-glass is directly from this literature.
- **Renewal-date clustering** kills negotiation leverage; spreading renewals across the year is a 1-time investment in 1-3% annual savings.

### 5. Procurement Leaders — Member research and benchmarks

Procurement Leaders (now part of World 50 Group) publishes member benchmark studies on category management, supplier relationship management, and digital procurement. Key insights:

- **20% of categories drive 80% of value** — the Pareto applies but the threshold is empirical, not theoretical. Run it on your own data.
- **Category managers spend < 10% of time on the 80%-impact categories** in untuned organizations, because every category gets equal effort regardless of strategic weight.

### 6. Gartner — *Magic Quadrant for Source-to-Pay Suites* and procurement research

Gartner's procurement research informs the tooling landscape and decision processes:

- **Source-to-pay automation** is the dominant procurement digitalization theme; spend categorization is the gateway capability that everything else (analytics, supplier risk, contract management) depends on.
- **UNSPSC is the de facto category taxonomy** for cross-company benchmarking. The full UNSPSC database has ~100k entries across 4 levels (Segment / Family / Class / Commodity); most companies use only Class-level (~5k codes) and the top 200 codes cover most of their spend.

### 7. UNSPSC — Official taxonomy documentation (United Nations Standard Products and Services Code)

UNSPSC is maintained by GS1 US and is the most-adopted international product/service classification standard. Reference points:

- **4-level hierarchy:** Segment (e.g., 43 — Information Technology Broadcasting and Telecommunications) → Family (e.g., 4323 — Software) → Class (e.g., 432315 — Business Function Specific Software) → Commodity (e.g., 43231505 — Database management system software).
- **Adopted by:** UN, World Bank, US Federal procurement, most Global 2000 enterprises.
- **This skill ships ~30 Class-level categories** aligned to UNSPSC nomenclature but not the full code set, because (a) the full set is overwhelming for first-pass categorization, (b) tech-company spend concentrates in 30 categories, (c) the skill's job is "find the Pareto", not "ISO-compliant procurement reporting."

For the full UNSPSC codeset, see: https://www.unspsc.org/

### 8. IACCM / WorldCC — *State of Contract and Commercial Management*

IACCM (now WorldCC) publishes contract management research that intersects with spend management at the renewal-cluster question:

- **Median enterprise has 60-80% of contracts auto-renewing** with no review, destroying both negotiation leverage and the ability to catch maverick categories early.
- **Renewal-date clustering** (multiple contracts renewing in the same calendar month) is a frequently-cited finding; the recommended fix is term-length negotiation at the next renewal to permanently stagger the calendar.

---

## How this skill applies the canon

- **Spend categorizer** uses Hackett/Gartner Pareto framing + UNSPSC-aligned taxonomy (Class level only).
- **Purchasing cycle analyzer** uses Hackett baseline (median, P90) + Goldratt-style 2× median bottleneck threshold.
- **Supplier consolidation planner** uses BCG migration-cost discipline + the tier-1 single-source refusal as a hard rule.
- **Renewal-cluster analysis** comes directly from IACCM and Spend Matters research on negotiation leverage timing.
