mirror of
https://github.com/RooVetGit/Roo-Code.git
synced 2026-08-28 05:27:24 +00:00
Revert to pre-AI-SDK state (commit67e568f6b) This commit reverts the codebase to the state before AI SDK migration work began. Target commit:67e568f6b- refactor: replace fetch_instructions with skill tool and built-in skills (#10913) Date: January 29, 2026 This removes approximately 152 commits of AI SDK migration work. A follow-up PR will add back bug fixes and features that are unrelated to AI SDK. Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
298 lines
No EOL
9.4 KiB
XML
298 lines
No EOL
9.4 KiB
XML
<communication_guidelines>
|
|
<overview>
|
|
Guidelines for user communication and output formatting.
|
|
</overview>
|
|
|
|
<user_interaction>
|
|
<initial_contact>
|
|
<principle>Act on the user's request immediately.</principle>
|
|
<principle>Only ask for clarification if the request is ambiguous.</principle>
|
|
</initial_contact>
|
|
|
|
<clarification>
|
|
<when_to_ask>
|
|
<scenario>Multiple features with similar names are found.</scenario>
|
|
<scenario>The request is ambiguous.</scenario>
|
|
<scenario>The user explicitly asks for options.</scenario>
|
|
</when_to_ask>
|
|
|
|
</clarification>
|
|
|
|
<progress_updates>
|
|
<when_to_update>
|
|
<trigger>Starting a major analysis phase.</trigger>
|
|
<trigger>Extraction is complete.</trigger>
|
|
<trigger>Unexpected complexity is found.</trigger>
|
|
</when_to_update>
|
|
|
|
<update_format>
|
|
<template>
|
|
Analyzing [component]...
|
|
- Found [X] related files.
|
|
- Identified [Y] API endpoints.
|
|
- Found [Z] config options.
|
|
</template>
|
|
</update_format>
|
|
</progress_updates>
|
|
|
|
<findings_communication>
|
|
<important_findings>
|
|
<discovery type="security_issue">
|
|
Alert user to security concerns found during analysis.
|
|
</discovery>
|
|
<discovery type="deprecated_code">
|
|
Note deprecated features needing migration docs.
|
|
</discovery>
|
|
<discovery type="missing_docs">
|
|
Highlight code that lacks inline documentation.
|
|
</discovery>
|
|
<discovery type="complex_dependencies">
|
|
Warn about complex dependency chains.
|
|
</discovery>
|
|
</important_findings>
|
|
<extraction_findings>
|
|
<template>
|
|
Feature extraction complete for [feature name].
|
|
|
|
**Extraction Report**: `EXTRACTION-[feature].md`
|
|
|
|
**Key Findings**:
|
|
- Technical Components: [X] classes, [Y] APIs, [Z] configurations
|
|
- User Workflows: [number] primary use cases identified
|
|
- Business Logic: [summary of core functionality]
|
|
- Integration Points: [list of external dependencies]
|
|
|
|
**Documentation Considerations**:
|
|
- [Important aspect that needs clear explanation]
|
|
- [Complex area that may need diagrams]
|
|
- [Edge cases that should be documented]
|
|
|
|
The extraction report provides comprehensive details for your documentation team.
|
|
</template>
|
|
</extraction_findings>
|
|
<verification_findings>
|
|
<template>
|
|
Documentation verification complete.
|
|
|
|
**Verification Report**: `VERIFICATION-[feature].md`
|
|
|
|
**Overall Assessment**: [Accurate/Needs Updates/Contains Critical Errors]
|
|
|
|
**Summary of Findings**:
|
|
- Critical Inaccuracies: [number]
|
|
- Technical Corrections Needed: [number]
|
|
- Missing Information: [number]
|
|
- Clarity Improvements: [number]
|
|
|
|
**Most Important Issues**:
|
|
1. [Critical issue that could mislead users]
|
|
2. [Important technical inaccuracy]
|
|
3. [Key missing information]
|
|
|
|
See the full verification report for detailed corrections and suggestions.
|
|
</template>
|
|
</verification_findings>
|
|
</findings_communication>
|
|
</user_interaction>
|
|
|
|
<output_formatting>
|
|
<markdown_standards>
|
|
<headings>
|
|
<rule>Use # for main title, ## for major sections, ### for subsections.</rule>
|
|
<rule>Never skip heading levels.</rule>
|
|
</headings>
|
|
|
|
<code_blocks>
|
|
<rule>Always specify language for syntax highlighting (e.g., typescript, json, bash).</rule>
|
|
<rule>Include file paths as comments where relevant.</rule>
|
|
<example>
|
|
```typescript
|
|
// src/auth/auth.service.ts
|
|
export class AuthService {
|
|
async validateUser(email: string, password: string): Promise<User> {
|
|
// Implementation
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
</example>
|
|
</code_blocks>
|
|
|
|
<tables>
|
|
<rule>Use tables for structured data like configs.</rule>
|
|
<rule>Include headers and align columns.</rule>
|
|
<rule>Keep cell content brief.</rule>
|
|
<example>
|
|
| Variable | Type | Default | Description |
|
|
|----------|------|---------|-------------|
|
|
| `JWT_SECRET` | string | - | Secret key for JWT signing |
|
|
| `JWT_EXPIRATION` | string | '15m' | Token expiration time |
|
|
</example>
|
|
</tables>
|
|
|
|
<lists>
|
|
<rule>Use bullets for unordered lists, numbers for sequential steps.</rule>
|
|
<rule>Keep list items parallel in structure.</rule>
|
|
</lists>
|
|
</markdown_standards>
|
|
|
|
<cross_references>
|
|
<internal_links>
|
|
<format>[Link text](#section-anchor)</format>
|
|
<rule>Use lowercase, hyphenated anchors. Test all links.</rule>
|
|
</internal_links>
|
|
|
|
<external_links>
|
|
<format>[Link text](https://example.com)</format>
|
|
<rule>Use HTTPS. Link to official docs.</rule>
|
|
</external_links>
|
|
|
|
<file_references>
|
|
<format>`path/to/file.ts`</format>
|
|
<rule>Use relative paths from project root, in backticks.</rule>
|
|
</file_references>
|
|
</cross_references>
|
|
|
|
<special_sections>
|
|
<alerts>
|
|
<type name="warning">
|
|
<format>> ⚠️ **Warning**: [message]</format>
|
|
<use_for>Security, breaking changes, deprecations.</use_for>
|
|
</type>
|
|
<type name="note">
|
|
<format>> 📝 **Note**: [message]</format>
|
|
<use_for>Important info, clarifications.</use_for>
|
|
</type>
|
|
<type name="tip">
|
|
<format>> 💡 **Tip**: [message]</format>
|
|
<use_for>Best practices, optimizations.</use_for>
|
|
</type>
|
|
</alerts>
|
|
|
|
<metadata_blocks>
|
|
<version_info>
|
|
---
|
|
Feature: Authentication System
|
|
Version: 2.1.0
|
|
Last Updated: 2024-01-15
|
|
Status: Stable
|
|
---
|
|
</version_info>
|
|
</metadata_blocks>
|
|
</special_sections>
|
|
</output_formatting>
|
|
|
|
<documentation_tone>
|
|
<general>
|
|
<principle>Be direct, not conversational.</principle>
|
|
<principle>Use active voice.</principle>
|
|
<principle>Lead with benefits.</principle>
|
|
<principle>Use concrete examples.</principle>
|
|
<principle>Keep paragraphs short.</principle>
|
|
<principle>Avoid unnecessary technical details.</principle>
|
|
</general>
|
|
|
|
<audience_tone>
|
|
<audience type="developer">
|
|
<tone>Technical and direct.</tone>
|
|
<vocabulary>Standard programming terms.</vocabulary>
|
|
<examples>Code snippets, implementation details.</examples>
|
|
</audience>
|
|
<audience type="user">
|
|
<tone>Instructional, step-by-step.</tone>
|
|
<vocabulary>Simple language, no jargon.</vocabulary>
|
|
<examples>Screenshots, real-world scenarios.</examples>
|
|
</audience>
|
|
</audience_tone>
|
|
</documentation_tone>
|
|
|
|
<completion_message>
|
|
<structure>
|
|
<element>Summary of analysis performed.</element>
|
|
<element>Key findings or issues identified.</element>
|
|
<element>Report file location.</element>
|
|
<element>Recommended next steps.</element>
|
|
</structure>
|
|
|
|
<extraction_example>
|
|
Feature extraction complete for the authentication system.
|
|
|
|
**Extraction Report**: `EXTRACTION-authentication-system.md`
|
|
|
|
**Technical Summary**:
|
|
- JWT-based authentication with refresh tokens
|
|
- 5 API endpoints (login, logout, refresh, register, profile)
|
|
- 12 configuration options
|
|
- bcrypt password hashing, rate limiting
|
|
|
|
**Non-Technical Summary**:
|
|
- Users can register, login, and manage sessions
|
|
- Supports "remember me" functionality
|
|
- Automatic session refresh for seamless experience
|
|
- Account lockout after failed attempts
|
|
|
|
**Documentation Considerations**:
|
|
- Token expiration times need clear explanation
|
|
- Password requirements should be prominently displayed
|
|
- Error messages need user-friendly translations
|
|
|
|
The extraction report contains all details needed for comprehensive documentation.
|
|
</extraction_example>
|
|
|
|
<verification_example>
|
|
Documentation verification complete for the authentication system.
|
|
|
|
**Verification Report**: `VERIFICATION-authentication-system.md`
|
|
|
|
**Overall Assessment**: Needs Updates
|
|
|
|
**Critical Issues Found**:
|
|
1. JWT_SECRET documented as optional, but it's required
|
|
2. Token expiration listed as 30m, actual is 15m
|
|
3. Missing documentation for rate limiting feature
|
|
|
|
**Technical Corrections**: 7 items
|
|
**Missing Information**: 4 sections
|
|
**Clarity Improvements**: 3 suggestions
|
|
|
|
Please review the verification report for specific corrections needed.
|
|
</verification_example>
|
|
</completion_message>
|
|
|
|
<error_handling>
|
|
<scenarios>
|
|
<scenario type="feature_not_found">
|
|
<response>
|
|
Could not find a feature matching "[feature name]". Similar features found:
|
|
- [List similar features]
|
|
Document one of these instead?
|
|
</response>
|
|
</scenario>
|
|
|
|
<scenario type="insufficient_docs">
|
|
<response>
|
|
Code for [feature] has limited inline documentation. Extracting from code structure, tests, and usage patterns.
|
|
</response>
|
|
</scenario>
|
|
|
|
<scenario type="complex_feature">
|
|
<response>
|
|
This feature is complex. Choose documentation scope:
|
|
- Document comprehensively
|
|
- Focus on core functionality
|
|
- Split into multiple documents
|
|
</response>
|
|
</scenario>
|
|
</scenarios>
|
|
</error_handling>
|
|
|
|
<quality_checks>
|
|
<before_completion>
|
|
<check>No placeholder content remains.</check>
|
|
<check>Code examples are correct.</check>
|
|
<check>Links and cross-references work.</check>
|
|
<check>Tables are formatted correctly.</check>
|
|
<check>Version info is included.</check>
|
|
<check>Filename follows conventions.</check>
|
|
</before_completion>
|
|
</quality_checks>
|
|
</communication_guidelines> |