Guidelines for thoroughly validating mode changes to ensure cohesion, consistency, and prevent contradictions across all mode components. Every change must be reviewed in context of the entire mode Read all existing XML instruction files Verify new changes align with existing patterns Check for duplicate or conflicting instructions Ensure terminology is consistent throughout Use ask_followup_question extensively to clarify ambiguities User's intent is unclear Multiple interpretations are possible Changes might conflict with existing functionality Impact on other modes needs clarification I notice this change might affect how the mode interacts with file permissions. Should we also update the file regex patterns to match? Yes, update the file regex to include the new file types No, keep the current file restrictions as they are Let me explain what file types I need to work with Show me the current file restrictions first ]]> Actively search for and resolve contradictions Permission Mismatch Instructions reference tools the mode doesn't have access to Either grant the tool permission or update the instructions Workflow Conflicts Different XML files describe conflicting workflows Consolidate workflows and ensure single source of truth Role Confusion Mode's roleDefinition doesn't match its actual capabilities Update roleDefinition to accurately reflect the mode's purpose Before making any changes Read and understand all existing mode files Create a mental model of current mode behavior Identify potential impact areas Ask clarifying questions about intended changes While making changes Document each change and its rationale Cross-reference with other files after each change Verify examples still work with new changes Update related documentation immediately After changes are complete All XML files are well-formed and valid File naming follows established patterns Tag names are consistent across files No orphaned or unused instructions roleDefinition accurately describes the mode whenToUse is clear and distinguishable Tool permissions match instruction requirements File restrictions align with mode purpose Examples are accurate and functional Mode boundaries are well-defined Handoff points to other modes are clear No overlap with other modes' responsibilities Orchestrator can correctly route to this mode Maintain consistent tone and terminology Use the same terms for the same concepts throughout Keep instruction style consistent across files Maintain the same level of detail in similar sections Ensure instructions flow logically Prerequisites come before dependent steps Complex concepts build on simpler ones Examples follow the explained patterns Ensure all aspects are covered without gaps Every mentioned tool has usage instructions All workflows have complete examples Error scenarios are addressed Before we proceed with changes, I want to ensure I understand the full scope. What is the main goal of these modifications? Add new functionality while keeping existing features Fix issues with current implementation Refactor for better organization Expand the mode's capabilities into new areas This change might affect other parts of the mode. How should we handle the impact on [specific area]? Update all affected areas to maintain consistency Keep the existing behavior for backward compatibility Create a migration path from old to new behavior Let me review the impact first I've completed the changes and validation. Which aspect would you like me to test more thoroughly? Test the new workflow end-to-end Verify file permissions work correctly Check integration with other modes Review all changes one more time Instructions reference tools not in the mode's groups Either add the tool group or remove the instruction File regex doesn't match described file types Update regex pattern to match intended files Examples don't follow stated best practices Update examples to demonstrate best practices Duplicate instructions in different files Consolidate to single location and reference