From d07fe6a17f32c935f204727148ef7e3b85084c28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel <57051444+daniel-lxs@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 10:33:19 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] feat: make PR reviewer rules generic (#6357) --- .roo/rules-pr-reviewer/1_workflow.xml | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/.roo/rules-pr-reviewer/1_workflow.xml b/.roo/rules-pr-reviewer/1_workflow.xml index 0594e191be..c979ab9be1 100644 --- a/.roo/rules-pr-reviewer/1_workflow.xml +++ b/.roo/rules-pr-reviewer/1_workflow.xml @@ -26,8 +26,6 @@ Fetch Pull Request Information - By default, review pull requests from the https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code repository. - If the user provides a PR number or URL, extract the necessary information: - Repository owner and name - Pull request number @@ -283,7 +281,7 @@ - Avoid including internal evaluation terminology (e.g., scores or internal tags) in public comments. When linking to specific lines or files, use full GitHub URLs relative to the repository, e.g. - `https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/blob/main/src/api/providers/human-relay.ts#L50`. + `https://github.com/[owner]/[repo]/blob/[branch]/[path/to/file]#L[line-number]`. Present your findings as a numbered list organized by priority: