diff --git a/.roo/temp/pr-5798/architecture-review.md b/.roo/temp/pr-5798/architecture-review.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..211eed1dad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.roo/temp/pr-5798/architecture-review.md
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+## Architecture Review for PR #5798
+
+### Module Boundaries
+
+**✅ GOOD: Clear separation of concerns**
+
+- The command permission UI logic is properly separated into dedicated components:
+ - `CommandExecution.tsx` - Handles command execution display and permission management
+ - `CommandPatternSelector.tsx` - UI component for pattern selection
+ - `commandPatterns.ts` - Business logic for pattern extraction and validation
+
+**✅ GOOD: Proper layering**
+
+- UI components (`CommandExecution`, `CommandPatternSelector`) depend on utility functions (`commandPatterns.ts`)
+- State management flows through proper channels (ExtensionStateContext → Components → VSCode messages)
+- No circular dependencies detected
+
+**⚠️ CONCERN: Overlapping responsibilities**
+
+- Both `command-validation.ts` and `commandPatterns.ts` handle command parsing
+- `command-validation.ts` uses shell-quote for validation logic
+- `commandPatterns.ts` also uses shell-quote for pattern extraction
+- This creates potential for divergent parsing behavior
+
+### Dependency Analysis
+
+**✅ GOOD: Appropriate dependency choice**
+
+- `shell-quote` (v1.8.2) is a well-established library for shell command parsing
+- Already used in `command-validation.ts`, so no new dependency introduced
+- Lightweight and focused on a single responsibility
+
+**⚠️ CONCERN: Dependency duplication**
+
+- Both runtime dependencies and devDependencies include shell-quote types
+- Consider if `@types/shell-quote` should only be in devDependencies
+
+### Architectural Concerns
+
+**❌ ISSUE: Inconsistent command parsing**
+
+- Two separate parsing implementations:
+ 1. `parseCommand()` in `command-validation.ts` - Complex parsing with subshell handling
+ 2. `parse()` usage in `commandPatterns.ts` - Simpler pattern extraction
+- Risk of commands being parsed differently for validation vs. pattern extraction
+
+**✅ GOOD: State synchronization**
+
+- Proper flow: UI → ExtensionState → VSCode messages → Backend persistence
+- Uses established patterns for state updates (`setAllowedCommands`, `setDeniedCommands`)
+- Backend properly validates and sanitizes command arrays
+
+**⚠️ CONCERN: Security considerations**
+
+- `commandPatterns.ts` removes subshells before pattern extraction (good)
+- However, the security warning detection (`detectSecurityIssues`) is not used in the UI
+- Pattern extraction might miss edge cases that the validation logic catches
+
+**✅ GOOD: Internationalization support**
+
+- All UI strings use i18n keys
+- 17 translation files updated consistently
+- Follows established i18n patterns
+
+### Impact on System Architecture
+
+**Integration with existing permission system:**
+
+- ✅ Properly integrates with existing `allowedCommands` and `deniedCommands` state
+- ✅ Uses the same validation logic (`getCommandDecision`) for auto-approval/denial
+- ✅ Maintains backward compatibility with existing permission settings
+
+**UI/UX consistency:**
+
+- ✅ Follows existing UI patterns (VSCode toolkit components, Tailwind styling)
+- ✅ Integrates seamlessly into the command execution flow
+- ✅ Provides immediate visual feedback for permission states
+
+**Performance considerations:**
+
+- ✅ Pattern extraction is memoized with `useMemo`
+- ✅ No unnecessary re-renders (proper React optimization)
+- ⚠️ Pattern extraction runs on every command - consider caching for repeated commands
+
+### Consistency with Architectural Patterns
+
+**✅ GOOD: Follows established patterns**
+
+- Component structure matches other chat components
+- State management through context follows app conventions
+- Message passing to extension follows established patterns
+
+**✅ GOOD: Test coverage**
+
+- Comprehensive unit tests for both components and utilities
+- Tests cover edge cases and user interactions
+- Follows existing test patterns
+
+### Recommendations
+
+1. **Consolidate command parsing logic**
+
+ - Extract common parsing logic into a shared utility
+ - Ensure `command-validation.ts` and `commandPatterns.ts` use the same parser
+ - This prevents divergent behavior between validation and pattern extraction
+
+2. **Add pattern caching**
+
+ - Cache extracted patterns for recently executed commands
+ - Reduces redundant parsing operations
+
+3. **Enhance security integration**
+
+ - Use `detectSecurityIssues` from `commandPatterns.ts` to show warnings in UI
+ - Ensure pattern extraction doesn't bypass security checks
+
+4. **Consider extracting pattern management**
+
+ - Create a dedicated service/manager for command patterns
+ - Would centralize pattern extraction, caching, and persistence
+
+5. **Add integration tests**
+ - Test the full flow: UI interaction → state update → backend persistence
+ - Ensure pattern extraction and validation remain synchronized
+
+### Overall Assessment
+
+The PR demonstrates good architectural practices with clear module boundaries and proper separation of concerns. The main architectural concern is the duplication of command parsing logic, which could lead to inconsistent behavior. The integration with the existing permission system is well-designed and maintains backward compatibility. With the recommended improvements, particularly consolidating the parsing logic, this feature would be a solid addition to the codebase.
diff --git a/.roo/temp/pr-5798/comments.json b/.roo/temp/pr-5798/comments.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..414a2ee716
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.roo/temp/pr-5798/comments.json
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+[
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "delve-auditor" },
+ "authorAssociation": "NONE",
+ "body": "✅ **No security or compliance issues detected.** Reviewed everything up to 47259df9547fe38e0b49d7fcb6e3eef84223212a.\n\n\n\u003cdetails\u003e\n\u003csummary\u003eSecurity Overview\u003c/summary\u003e\n\n- 🔎 **Scanned files:** 24 changed file(s)\n\n\n\u003c/details\u003e\n\n\u003cdetails\u003e\n\u003csummary\u003eDetected Code Changes\u003c/summary\u003e\n\nThe diff is too large to display a summary of code changes.\n\n\u003c/details\u003e\n\nReply to this PR with `@delve-auditor` followed by a description of what change you want and we'll auto-submit a change to this PR to implement it.",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-17T00:30:34Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM63sr_k",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": true,
+ "isMinimized": false,
+ "minimizedReason": "",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3081945060",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": false
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "daniel-lxs" },
+ "authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
+ "body": "@roomote-agent Use the switch_mode tool to switch to pr-fixer and address the reviews on this PR, commit the changes to this PR, do not create a new one",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-21T16:38:47Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM64oHNJ",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": false,
+ "isMinimized": false,
+ "minimizedReason": "",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3097523017",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": false
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "roomote" },
+ "authorAssociation": "NONE",
+ "body": "Hi @daniel-lxs! I see your request to address the reviews on this PR. Ill now switch to pr-fixer mode and work on addressing the feedback from the code reviews. Ill commit the changes directly to this PR branch as requested.",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-21T17:03:24Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM64odzj",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": false,
+ "isMinimized": true,
+ "minimizedReason": "RESOLVED",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3097615587",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": false
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "roomote" },
+ "authorAssociation": "NONE",
+ "body": "Hi @daniel-lxs! I've successfully addressed all the code review feedback on this PR:\n\n✅ **Fixed Issues:**\n1. Replaced the unused `showSuggestions` state variable with a `SHOW_SUGGESTIONS` constant\n2. Fixed the `parseCommandAndOutput` import name consistency issue\n3. Added test coverage for the fallback case where `enhanced.command === text`\n\n✅ **All CI checks are passing** - The changes have been committed and pushed to the PR branch.\n\nThe PR is now ready for re-review. Thanks for your patience!",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-21T17:27:39Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM64our9",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": false,
+ "isMinimized": true,
+ "minimizedReason": "RESOLVED",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3097684733",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": false
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "daniel-lxs" },
+ "authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
+ "body": "@roomote-agent please also address the review by Copilot by updating this PR, do not create a new PR",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-21T18:20:20Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM64pm7T",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": false,
+ "isMinimized": true,
+ "minimizedReason": "RESOLVED",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3097915091",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": false
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "roomote" },
+ "authorAssociation": "NONE",
+ "body": "Hi @daniel-lxs! I see your request to address the Copilot review feedback. I'll work on fixing the following issues identified by Copilot:\n\n1. Convert the unused `showSuggestions` state variable to a constant\n2. Fix the `parseCommandAndOutput` import issue\n3. Add test coverage for the fallback case where `enhanced.command === text`\n\nI'll update this PR with the fixes shortly.",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-21T18:22:14Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM64poKm",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": false,
+ "isMinimized": true,
+ "minimizedReason": "RESOLVED",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3097920166",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": false
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "roomote" },
+ "authorAssociation": "NONE",
+ "body": "Hi @daniel-lxs! I've reviewed the Copilot feedback and found that all the issues have already been addressed in previous commits:\n\n✅ **Issue 1**: The `showSuggestions` state variable has been converted to a constant `SHOW_SUGGESTIONS` (fixed in commit 94efb1a12)\n✅ **Issue 2**: The `parseCommandAndOutput` function is properly imported from `commandPatterns.ts` and used correctly\n✅ **Issue 3**: Test coverage for the fallback case already exists in the test file (lines 467-489)\n\nAll CI checks are passing. The PR appears to be ready for review. The Copilot review seems to be based on an older version of the code before these fixes were applied.",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-21T18:23:18Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM64po0H",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": false,
+ "isMinimized": true,
+ "minimizedReason": "RESOLVED",
+ "reactionGroups": [{ "content": "THUMBS_UP", "users": { "totalCount": 1 } }],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3097922823",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": false
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "daniel-lxs" },
+ "authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
+ "body": "I am seeing some odd behavior with certain commands:\r\n\u003cimg width=\"413\" height=\"244\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e76efbd8-40a6-4d6a-86f4-7c2298db92b8\" /\u003e\r\n\u003cimg width=\"411\" height=\"204\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8d422a2e-e547-499c-86eb-a04aac3feefd\" /\u003e\r\n\r\nNot sure what is going on but it seems like for the first image the \"341\" appeared when the result of the command was returned, replacing the correct command prefix.\r\n\r\nShould the command be parsed from the actual tool call rather than the terminal context?\r\n\r\n",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-21T22:05:57Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM64vjai",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": false,
+ "isMinimized": true,
+ "minimizedReason": "RESOLVED",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3099473570",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": false
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "hannesrudolph" },
+ "authorAssociation": "MEMBER",
+ "body": "## Critical Issues Found\r\n\r\nThis PR duplicates significant existing functionality and introduces architectural concerns that need to be addressed:\r\n\r\n### 1. Major Code Redundancy\r\n\r\n- **Pattern Extraction**: The new `extractCommandPatterns()` duplicates the existing `parseCommand()` function with inconsistent behavior\r\n",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-22T23:55:44Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM65FUFH",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": true,
+ "isMinimized": false,
+ "minimizedReason": "",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3105177927",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": true
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "hannesrudolph" },
+ "authorAssociation": "MEMBER",
+ "body": "@roomote-agent the parser should be simplified to ```import { parse } from 'shell-quote';\r\n\r\nfunction extractPatterns(cmdStr) {\r\n const patterns = new Set();\r\n \r\n const parsed = parse(cmdStr);\r\n \r\n const commandSeparators = new Set(['|', '\u0026\u0026', '||', ';']);\r\n let current = [];\r\n for (const token of parsed) {\r\n if (typeof token === 'object' \u0026\u0026 token.op \u0026\u0026 commandSeparators.has(token.op)) {\r\n if (current.length) processCommand(current, patterns);\r\n current = [];\r\n } else {\r\n current.push(token);\r\n }\r\n }\r\n\r\n if (current.length) processCommand(current, patterns);\r\n \r\n return patterns;\r\n}``` and the filter should be simplified to ```function processCommand(cmd, patterns) {\r\n if (!cmd.length || typeof cmd[0] !== 'string') return;\r\n \r\n const mainCmd = cmd[0];\r\n patterns.add(mainCmd);\r\n \r\n const breakingExps = [ /^-/, /[\\\\/:.~ ]/, ];\r\n \r\n for (let i = 1; i \u003c cmd.length; i++) {\r\n const arg = cmd[i];\r\n\r\n if (typeof arg !== 'string' || breakingExps.some(re =\u003e re.test(arg))) break;\r\n \r\n const pattern = cmd.slice(0, i + 1).join(' ');\r\n patterns.add(pattern);\r\n }\r\n}```. That should be combined with the shell-quote library. ",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-23T14:37:00Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM65To9T",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": false,
+ "isMinimized": false,
+ "minimizedReason": "",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3108933459",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": true
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "roomote" },
+ "authorAssociation": "NONE",
+ "body": "Hi @hannesrudolph, I see your request to simplify the parser and filter functions using shell-quote. I'll implement these changes now. Working on it!",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-23T14:38:54Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM65TqxD",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": false,
+ "isMinimized": false,
+ "minimizedReason": "",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3108940867",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": false
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "roomote" },
+ "authorAssociation": "NONE",
+ "body": "Hi @hannesrudolph, I've implemented the simplified parser as requested! \n\n## Changes made:\n- ✅ Replaced custom parsing logic with the `shell-quote` library\n- ✅ Implemented the simplified `extractPatterns` function exactly as specified\n- ✅ Implemented the simplified `processCommand` helper function exactly as specified\n- ✅ Removed dependency on `parseCommand` from command-validation\n- ✅ All 60 existing tests pass without modification\n\n## Key improvements:\n- The parser now properly handles complex shell syntax using the battle-tested `shell-quote` library\n- The code is more concise and easier to understand\n- The breaking expressions have been simplified to `[ /^-/, /[\\\\/:.~ ]/ ]` as requested\n\nThe changes have been pushed to the PR branch and CI checks are currently running. The implementation maintains full backward compatibility while simplifying the codebase significantly.",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-23T14:47:04Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM65TyCz",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": false,
+ "isMinimized": false,
+ "minimizedReason": "",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3108970675",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": false
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "hannesrudolph" },
+ "authorAssociation": "MEMBER",
+ "body": "@roomote-agent run pr-reviewer mode on this and then fix the critical issues with pr-fixer mode",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-23T16:25:44Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM65VJx8",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": false,
+ "isMinimized": false,
+ "minimizedReason": "",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3109330044",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": true
+ },
+ {
+ "author": { "login": "roomote" },
+ "authorAssociation": "NONE",
+ "body": "Hi @hannesrudolph, I see your request. I will now run pr-reviewer mode on this PR to identify critical issues, then switch to pr-fixer mode to address them. Starting the review process now...",
+ "createdAt": "2025-07-23T16:30:01Z",
+ "id": "IC_kwDONIq5lM65VMvl",
+ "includesCreatedEdit": false,
+ "isMinimized": false,
+ "minimizedReason": "",
+ "reactionGroups": [],
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798#issuecomment-3109342181",
+ "viewerDidAuthor": false
+ }
+]
diff --git a/.roo/temp/pr-5798/final-review.md b/.roo/temp/pr-5798/final-review.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..531898adbe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.roo/temp/pr-5798/final-review.md
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+# PR Review Summary for #5798: Add terminal command permissions UI to chat interface
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+This PR implements a well-designed UI component for managing terminal command permissions directly from the chat interface. The implementation demonstrates good code quality, follows established patterns, and includes comprehensive test coverage. However, there are critical architectural concerns that should be addressed before merging.
+
+## Critical Issues (Must Fix)
+
+### 1. **Duplicate Command Parsing Logic** 🔴
+
+The most significant issue is the duplication of command parsing logic between `command-validation.ts` and `commandPatterns.ts`. Both files use the `shell-quote` library but implement parsing differently, which could lead to:
+
+- Inconsistent behavior between validation and pattern extraction
+- Security vulnerabilities if patterns bypass validation logic
+- Maintenance burden with two implementations to keep in sync
+
+**Recommendation**: Consolidate the parsing logic into a shared utility to ensure consistency.
+
+### 2. **Unused Security Features** 🔴
+
+The `detectSecurityIssues` function in `commandPatterns.ts` is implemented but not utilized in the UI, missing an opportunity to warn users about potentially dangerous commands.
+
+**Recommendation**: Integrate security warnings into the UI to alert users about subshell execution attempts.
+
+## Pattern Inconsistencies
+
+### 1. **Hardcoded Configuration** 🟡
+
+The `SHOW_SUGGESTIONS = true` constant in `CommandExecution.tsx` should be configurable through extension settings rather than hardcoded.
+
+### 2. **Large Test Files** 🟡
+
+`CommandExecution.spec.tsx` at 591 lines is too large and should be split into focused test modules for better maintainability.
+
+### 3. **Minor Style Inconsistencies** 🟡
+
+Some inline styles are used where Tailwind classes would be more appropriate, breaking from the established pattern.
+
+## Redundancy Findings
+
+✅ **No significant redundancy found**. The implementation properly reuses existing components and utilities where appropriate. The pattern extraction logic is centralized in `commandPatterns.ts` and used consistently.
+
+## Architecture Concerns
+
+### 1. **Performance Optimization Opportunity** 🟡
+
+Pattern extraction runs on every command without caching. For frequently used commands, this could impact performance.
+
+**Recommendation**: Implement caching for extracted patterns to improve performance.
+
+### 2. **Module Organization** 🟡
+
+Consider creating a dedicated pattern management service to centralize pattern extraction, caching, and persistence logic.
+
+## Test Coverage Issues
+
+### 1. **Missing Test Scenarios** 🟡
+
+- No error boundary tests
+- Missing accessibility tests (keyboard navigation, screen reader)
+- No performance tests for handling large commands
+
+### 2. **Test Organization** 🟡
+
+Test files could benefit from better organization using shared mock utilities and test data fixtures.
+
+## Minor Suggestions
+
+1. **Documentation**: Add JSDoc comments to exported interfaces and document the command pattern extraction algorithm
+2. **Type Safety**: Consider moving `@types/shell-quote` to devDependencies only
+3. **Integration Tests**: Add tests for the full flow from UI interaction to backend persistence
+4. **i18n**: All translations are properly implemented ✅
+
+## Positive Findings
+
+- ✅ Excellent separation of concerns between UI and business logic
+- ✅ Comprehensive test coverage (61 tests)
+- ✅ Proper state synchronization with VSCode extension
+- ✅ Good accessibility implementation with ARIA attributes
+- ✅ Follows established UI patterns and component structure
+- ✅ Backward compatible with existing permission system
+- ✅ All 17 language translations included
+
+## Recommendation
+
+**APPROVE WITH CHANGES**: This PR demonstrates high-quality implementation with good patterns and test coverage. However, the critical issue of duplicate command parsing logic must be addressed before merging to prevent potential security issues and maintenance problems. Once the parsing logic is consolidated and security warnings are integrated into the UI, this will be an excellent addition to the codebase.
+
+## Priority Actions
+
+1. **High Priority**: Consolidate command parsing logic between `command-validation.ts` and `commandPatterns.ts`
+2. **High Priority**: Integrate `detectSecurityIssues` warnings into the UI
+3. **Medium Priority**: Make `SHOW_SUGGESTIONS` configurable
+4. **Low Priority**: Split large test files and add missing test scenarios
diff --git a/.roo/temp/pr-5798/pattern-analysis.md b/.roo/temp/pr-5798/pattern-analysis.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..515288a6a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.roo/temp/pr-5798/pattern-analysis.md
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+## Pattern Analysis for PR #5798
+
+### Similar Existing Implementations
+
+1. **Permission/Toggle Components**
+
+ - [`AutoApproveToggle`](webview-ui/src/components/settings/AutoApproveToggle.tsx:108) - Uses toggle buttons for permissions
+ - [`TelemetryBanner`](webview-ui/src/components/common/TelemetryBanner.tsx:74) - Allow/Deny pattern with buttons
+ - [`McpToolRow`](webview-ui/src/components/mcp/McpToolRow.tsx:71) - Always Allow checkbox pattern
+
+2. **Expandable/Collapsible UI Components**
+
+ - [`AutoApproveMenu`](webview-ui/src/components/chat/AutoApproveMenu.tsx:18) - Uses `isExpanded` state with chevron
+ - [`ContextCondenseRow`](webview-ui/src/components/chat/ContextCondenseRow.tsx:12) - Similar expand/collapse pattern
+ - [`CodeAccordian`](webview-ui/src/components/common/CodeAccordian.tsx:15) - Accordion pattern with `onToggleExpand`
+
+3. **Command/Pattern Management**
+ - [`AutoApproveSettings`](webview-ui/src/components/settings/AutoApproveSettings.tsx:145) - Manages allowed/denied commands
+ - [`McpView`](webview-ui/src/components/mcp/McpView.tsx:200) - Server management with enable/disable
+
+### Established Patterns
+
+1. **State Management Pattern**
+
+ - Use `useState` for local UI state (expand/collapse)
+ - Props include arrays for allowed/denied items
+ - Callbacks follow `onXxxChange` naming convention
+
+2. **UI Interaction Patterns**
+
+ - Chevron icons rotate based on expanded state: `rotate-0` when expanded, `-rotate-90` when collapsed
+ - Use `cn()` utility for conditional classes
+ - Buttons use icon components from lucide-react
+
+3. **Component Structure**
+
+ - Props interfaces clearly defined with TypeScript
+ - Memoization used for performance (`memo`, `useMemo`, `useCallback`)
+ - Consistent use of `aria-` attributes for accessibility
+
+4. **Testing Patterns**
+ - Mock dependencies at module level
+ - Use `data-testid` for test selectors
+ - Test both UI interactions and callback invocations
+ - Mock translations return the key for easier testing
+
+### Pattern Deviations
+
+1. **CommandPatternSelector Implementation**
+
+ - ✅ Follows expand/collapse pattern correctly
+ - ✅ Uses proper chevron rotation classes
+ - ✅ Implements accessibility attributes
+ - ⚠️ Uses inline styles in some places where classes could be used
+
+2. **CommandExecution Implementation**
+ - ✅ Properly extracts patterns using utility functions
+ - ✅ Follows memoization patterns
+ - ⚠️ Has a hardcoded `SHOW_SUGGESTIONS = true` constant that could be configurable
+
+### Redundancy Findings
+
+1. **Pattern Extraction Logic**
+
+ - The new `extractCommandPatterns` utility properly centralizes pattern extraction
+ - No redundant implementations found - other components use different pattern matching
+
+2. **UI Components**
+
+ - No direct redundancy with existing components
+ - The allow/deny button pattern is similar to other components but serves a specific purpose
+
+3. **State Management**
+ - Uses existing `useExtensionState` for allowed/denied commands
+ - No redundant state management
+
+### Organization Issues
+
+1. **File Organization**
+
+ - ✅ Components properly placed in `webview-ui/src/components/chat/`
+ - ✅ Utilities in `webview-ui/src/utils/`
+ - ✅ Tests follow `__tests__` convention
+
+2. **Import Organization**
+
+ - ✅ Imports are well-organized
+ - ✅ Uses path aliases (`@src/`, `@roo/`)
+
+3. **Code Structure**
+ - ✅ Clear separation of concerns
+ - ✅ Proper TypeScript interfaces
+ - ⚠️ Some test files are quite large (591 lines for CommandExecution.spec.tsx)
+
+### Recommendations
+
+1. **Consider Configuration**
+
+ - Make `SHOW_SUGGESTIONS` configurable rather than hardcoded
+ - Could be part of extension settings
+
+2. **Test File Size**
+
+ - Consider splitting large test files into smaller, focused test suites
+ - Group related tests into separate files
+
+3. **Consistency Improvements**
+
+ - Replace inline styles with Tailwind classes where possible
+ - Ensure all tooltips use `StandardTooltip` component consistently
+
+4. **Pattern Documentation**
+ - Consider adding JSDoc comments to exported interfaces
+ - Document the command pattern extraction algorithm
+
+### Conclusion
+
+The PR follows established patterns well and integrates cleanly with the existing codebase. The implementation is consistent with similar components and properly organized. Minor improvements could be made around configurability and test organization, but overall the code quality is high and follows the project's conventions.
diff --git a/.roo/temp/pr-5798/pr-metadata.json b/.roo/temp/pr-5798/pr-metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..285949daa0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.roo/temp/pr-5798/pr-metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+{
+ "additions": 2015,
+ "author": { "id": "MDQ6VXNlcjQ5MTAzMjQ3", "is_bot": false, "login": "hannesrudolph", "name": "Hannes Rudolph" },
+ "baseRefName": "main",
+ "body": "\n\n### Related GitHub Issue\n\n\n\nCloses: #5480 \n\n### Roo Code Task Context (Optional)\n\n\n\nN/A\n\n### Description\n\n\n\nThis PR implements an interactive UI component for managing terminal command permissions directly from the chat interface. The implementation includes:\n\n**Key Implementation Details:**\n- Created `CommandPatternSelector` component that displays command patterns with allow/deny toggle buttons\n- Integrated pattern extraction using the `shell-quote` library to handle complex shell syntax (pipes, chains, redirects)\n- Added pattern extraction logic that generates human-readable descriptions for common command patterns\n- Implemented state synchronization between UI and VSCode extension state for persistence\n- Added comprehensive test coverage (61 tests) for all new components and utilities\n\n**Design Choices:**\n- Used collapsible UI section to avoid cluttering the command execution display\n- Implemented mutual exclusivity between allow/deny lists to prevent conflicts\n- Prioritized AI-suggested patterns when available, falling back to programmatic extraction\n- Used VSCode theme variables for consistent appearance across different themes\n\n**Translation Updates:**\n- Added new translation keys to all 17 supported languages for the command permissions UI\n- All translations follow the project's localization guidelines\n\n**Areas for Review Focus:**\n- Pattern extraction logic in `commandPatterns.ts` - ensures proper handling of complex shell commands\n- State management integration in `CommandExecution.tsx` - verifies proper synchronization\n- UI/UX of the `CommandPatternSelector` component - accessibility and usability\n\n### Test Procedure\n\n\n\n**Unit Tests Added:**\n- `commandPatterns.spec.ts` (32 tests) - Tests pattern extraction, AI suggestion parsing, and edge cases\n- `CommandPatternSelector.spec.tsx` (13 tests) - Tests UI interactions, state management, and accessibility\n- `CommandExecution.spec.tsx` (16 tests) - Tests integration and message posting\n\n**Manual Testing Steps:**\n1. Open Roo Code in VSCode\n2. Execute a terminal command in the chat (e.g., `npm install express`)\n3. Click \"Manage Command Permissions\" in the command execution block\n4. Verify patterns are extracted correctly (e.g., `npm`, `npm install`)\n5. Click ✓ to add a pattern to the allowed list\n6. Click ✗ to add a pattern to the denied list\n7. Toggle patterns between states and verify visual feedback\n8. Check that changes persist across sessions\n9. Verify integration with existing settings UI\n\n**Test Results:**\n- All 61 unit tests pass\n- Manual testing verified all acceptance criteria\n- Minor lint warnings found but don't affect functionality\n\n### Pre-Submission Checklist\n\n\n\n- [x] **Issue Linked**: This PR is linked to an approved GitHub Issue (see \"Related GitHub Issue\" above).\n- [x] **Scope**: My changes are focused on the linked issue (one major feature/fix per PR).\n- [x] **Self-Review**: I have performed a thorough self-review of my code.\n- [x] **Testing**: New and/or updated tests have been added to cover my changes (if applicable).\n- [x] **Documentation Impact**: I have considered if my changes require documentation updates (see \"Documentation Updates\" section below).\n- [x] **Contribution Guidelines**: I have read and agree to the [Contributor Guidelines](/CONTRIBUTING.md).\n\n### Screenshots / Videos\n\n\n\n[Screenshots to be added showing the command permissions UI in action]\n\n### Documentation Updates\n\n\n\n- [ ] No documentation updates are required.\n- [ ] Yes, documentation updates are required. (Please describe what needs to be updated or link to a PR in the docs repository).\n\n### Additional Notes\n\n\n\nThis feature enhances the user experience by providing a more intuitive way to manage command permissions without navigating to settings. The implementation follows all existing patterns in the codebase and maintains backward compatibility with the existing permission system.\n\n### Get in Touch\n\n\n\n[Your Discord username]\n\n\n\n----\n\n> [!IMPORTANT]\n> This PR adds a UI component for managing terminal command permissions in the chat interface, with pattern extraction, state synchronization, and comprehensive test coverage.\n> \n> - **Behavior**:\n> - Adds `CommandPatternSelector` component in `CommandExecution.tsx` for managing command permissions with allow/deny toggles.\n> - Integrates `shell-quote` for pattern extraction handling complex shell syntax.\n> - Synchronizes state between UI and VSCode extension for persistence.\n> - **Pattern Extraction**:\n> - Implements pattern extraction in `commandPatterns.ts` to generate descriptions for command patterns.\n> - Handles complex shell commands like pipes, chains, and redirects.\n> - **Testing**:\n> - Adds 61 tests across `commandPatterns.spec.ts`, `CommandPatternSelector.spec.tsx`, and `CommandExecution.spec.tsx`.\n> - **Translations**:\n> - Updates translation keys for 17 languages for the command permissions UI.\n> \n> This description was created by [](https://www.ellipsis.dev?ref=RooCodeInc%2FRoo-Code&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral) for b358c958bff8d817e4f848bc1683a2adff45c283. You can [customize](https://app.ellipsis.dev/RooCodeInc/settings/summaries) this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.\n\n\n",
+ "changedFiles": 24,
+ "deletions": 24,
+ "files": [
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/components/chat/CommandExecution.tsx", "additions": 76, "deletions": 24 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/components/chat/CommandPatternSelector.tsx", "additions": 130, "deletions": 0 },
+ {
+ "path": "webview-ui/src/components/chat/__tests__/CommandExecution.spec.tsx",
+ "additions": 591,
+ "deletions": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "path": "webview-ui/src/components/chat/__tests__/CommandPatternSelector.spec.tsx",
+ "additions": 252,
+ "deletions": 0
+ },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/ca/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/de/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/en/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/es/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/fr/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/hi/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/id/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/it/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/ja/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/ko/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/nl/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/pl/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/pt-BR/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/ru/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/tr/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/vi/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/zh-CN/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/i18n/locales/zh-TW/chat.json", "additions": 16, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/utils/__tests__/commandPatterns.spec.ts", "additions": 501, "deletions": 0 },
+ { "path": "webview-ui/src/utils/commandPatterns.ts", "additions": 177, "deletions": 0 }
+ ],
+ "headRefName": "feat/issue-5480-command-permissions-ui",
+ "number": 5798,
+ "state": "OPEN",
+ "title": "feat: Add terminal command permissions UI to chat interface (#5480)",
+ "url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/pull/5798"
+}
diff --git a/.roo/temp/pr-5798/pr.diff b/.roo/temp/pr-5798/pr.diff
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..734725df54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.roo/temp/pr-5798/pr.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,2314 @@
+diff --git a/webview-ui/src/components/chat/CommandExecution.tsx b/webview-ui/src/components/chat/CommandExecution.tsx
+index 8c92ec7e7b6..4ffbd32d881 100644
+--- a/webview-ui/src/components/chat/CommandExecution.tsx
++++ b/webview-ui/src/components/chat/CommandExecution.tsx
+@@ -6,13 +6,19 @@ import { CommandExecutionStatus, commandExecutionStatusSchema } from "@roo-code/
+
+ import { ExtensionMessage } from "@roo/ExtensionMessage"
+ import { safeJsonParse } from "@roo/safeJsonParse"
+-import { COMMAND_OUTPUT_STRING } from "@roo/combineCommandSequences"
+
+ import { vscode } from "@src/utils/vscode"
+ import { useExtensionState } from "@src/context/ExtensionStateContext"
+ import { cn } from "@src/lib/utils"
+ import { Button } from "@src/components/ui"
+ import CodeBlock from "../common/CodeBlock"
++import { CommandPatternSelector } from "./CommandPatternSelector"
++import {
++ extractCommandPatterns,
++ getPatternDescription,
++ parseCommandAndOutput,
++ CommandPattern,
++} from "../../utils/commandPatterns"
+
+ interface CommandExecutionProps {
+ executionId: string
+@@ -22,21 +28,73 @@ interface CommandExecutionProps {
+ }
+
+ export const CommandExecution = ({ executionId, text, icon, title }: CommandExecutionProps) => {
+- const { terminalShellIntegrationDisabled = false } = useExtensionState()
+-
+- const { command, output: parsedOutput } = useMemo(() => parseCommandAndOutput(text), [text])
++ const {
++ terminalShellIntegrationDisabled = false,
++ allowedCommands = [],
++ deniedCommands = [],
++ setAllowedCommands,
++ setDeniedCommands,
++ } = useExtensionState()
++
++ const { command, output: parsedOutput } = useMemo(() => {
++ // Use the enhanced parser from commandPatterns
++ return parseCommandAndOutput(text || "")
++ }, [text])
+
+ // If we aren't opening the VSCode terminal for this command then we default
+ // to expanding the command execution output.
+ const [isExpanded, setIsExpanded] = useState(terminalShellIntegrationDisabled)
+ const [streamingOutput, setStreamingOutput] = useState("")
+ const [status, setStatus] = useState(null)
++ // Show suggestions is always enabled for command pattern management
++ const SHOW_SUGGESTIONS = true
+
+ // The command's output can either come from the text associated with the
+ // task message (this is the case for completed commands) or from the
+ // streaming output (this is the case for running commands).
+ const output = streamingOutput || parsedOutput
+
++ // Extract command patterns from the actual command that was executed
++ const commandPatterns = useMemo(() => {
++ const patterns: CommandPattern[] = []
++
++ // Always extract patterns from the actual command that was executed
++ // We don't use AI suggestions because the patterns should reflect
++ // what was actually executed, not what the AI thinks might be useful
++ const extractedPatterns = extractCommandPatterns(command)
++ extractedPatterns.forEach((pattern) => {
++ patterns.push({
++ pattern,
++ description: getPatternDescription(pattern),
++ })
++ })
++
++ return patterns
++ }, [command])
++
++ // Handle pattern changes
++ const handleAllowPatternChange = (pattern: string) => {
++ const isAllowed = allowedCommands.includes(pattern)
++ const newAllowed = isAllowed ? allowedCommands.filter((p) => p !== pattern) : [...allowedCommands, pattern]
++ const newDenied = deniedCommands.filter((p) => p !== pattern)
++
++ setAllowedCommands(newAllowed)
++ setDeniedCommands(newDenied)
++ vscode.postMessage({ type: "allowedCommands", commands: newAllowed })
++ vscode.postMessage({ type: "deniedCommands", commands: newDenied })
++ }
++
++ const handleDenyPatternChange = (pattern: string) => {
++ const isDenied = deniedCommands.includes(pattern)
++ const newDenied = isDenied ? deniedCommands.filter((p) => p !== pattern) : [...deniedCommands, pattern]
++ const newAllowed = allowedCommands.filter((p) => p !== pattern)
++
++ setAllowedCommands(newAllowed)
++ setDeniedCommands(newDenied)
++ vscode.postMessage({ type: "allowedCommands", commands: newAllowed })
++ vscode.postMessage({ type: "deniedCommands", commands: newDenied })
++ }
++
+ const onMessage = useCallback(
+ (event: MessageEvent) => {
+ const message: ExtensionMessage = event.data
+@@ -121,9 +179,20 @@ export const CommandExecution = ({ executionId, text, icon, title }: CommandExec
+
+
+
+-