# Memory as File ReMe's core idea is **Memory as File, File as Memory**.

ReMe Memory as File model

**Memory as File**: long-term memory is not hidden in a black-box database. It lives in Markdown files, resource files, and index snapshots under the workspace. Users and agents can directly read, write, move, and delete those files. **File as Memory**: each file is more than ordinary text. It is an indexable, linkable, and evolvable memory node. ReMe parses frontmatter, body chunks, and wikilink edges from files and organizes them into retrieval indexes and a graph. In other words, files are both a human-readable interface and an operational interface for agents. Directory structure carries the memory layers, while Markdown syntax expresses content, metadata, and relationships. ## Design Goals ReMe represents memory as files not merely for convenient storage, but to give long-term memory several essential properties: | Goal | Meaning | |---|---| | Readable | Users can open the workspace directly and read daily notes, digest nodes, and source material like ordinary notes. | | Editable | Users and agents can correct, extend, move, or delete memory with file operations, without a specialized database client. | | Traceable | Long-term conclusions in digest can point back to daily, resource, or session files from a Sources section. | | Portable | The workspace is an ordinary directory. Markdown, JSONL, YAML, and resource files can be backed up, synchronized, versioned, or moved to other tools. | | Indexable | Although the files are plain text, ReMe parses frontmatter, chunks, and wikilinks to build a retrieval index and file graph. | | Collaborative | Humans judge and correct; agents organize, link, and retrieve. Both operate on the same files. | ReMe memory is therefore neither a hidden database record nor a prompt fragment visible only to an LLM. It is first a file owned by the user and only then indexed by the system for retrieval. ## Memory Layers A ReMe workspace divides memory into four layers: ```text raw input -> session/ + resource/ working memory -> daily/ long memory -> digest/ system state -> metadata/ ``` Each layer solves a different problem. `session/` and `resource/` preserve raw input. Their purpose is to retain the original situation: conversations, agent sessions, uploaded material, web pages, and reports remain intact as evidence for later verification. `daily/` is the lightly processed layer. It organizes the day's conversations and resources into more readable daily notes: what happened, which conclusions were reached, which follow-up tasks remain, and where the source material lives. Daily does not aim for final abstraction; it is closer to a workbench for the day. `digest/` is the deeply processed layer. It stores memory nodes that can be reused over time, such as user preferences, project background, procedural experience, conceptual knowledge, and decision precedents. Digest should not merely copy daily. It should merge recurring facts, methods, and relationships into more stable descriptions. `metadata/` is the system index layer. It stores runtime state such as the file catalog, chunk index, and graph snapshots. Users normally do not edit this content manually. The actual editing surface is `daily/`, `digest/`, and, when necessary, `resource/`. These layers let ReMe preserve both the original situation and its abstraction: daily reconstructs what happened, while digest answers what remains reusable later. ## Directory Layout ReMe uses directories to express memory organization and layers. Source material first enters `resource/` or `session/`, then flows into `daily/`, and is finally integrated into `digest/` by `auto_dream`. The corresponding automatic flows are [Auto Memory](./auto_memory.md), [Auto Resource](./auto_resource.md), and [Auto Dream](./auto_dream.md). Use [Memory Search](./memory_search.md) to retrieve these files. ```text / ├── metadata/ # system index layer; persistent indexes, graph, catalogs; not a manual editing surface ├── session/ # raw input layer; original conversations and agent sessions │ ├── dialog/ │ │ └── .jsonl # conversation messages saved by auto_memory │ ├── agentscope/ │ │ └── .jsonl │ └── claude_code/ │ └── .jsonl ├── resource/ # raw input layer; original external material │ └── YYYY-MM-DD/ │ └── . ├── daily/ # lightly processed layer; facts, conversation summaries, and resource interpretations by date │ ├── YYYY-MM-DD.md # index page for the day │ └── YYYY-MM-DD/ │ ├── .md # daily note distilled from a conversation │ ├── .md # daily note distilled from a resource │ └── interests.yaml # proactive interest topics generated by auto_dream └── digest/ # deeply processed layer; reusable personal facts, procedures, and knowledge nodes ├── personal/ │ └── .md # user profile, preferences, and durable personal facts ├── procedure/ │ └── .md # procedures, methods, and operational experience └── wiki/ └── .md # general knowledge, concepts, and decision precedents ``` Typical flows: ```text conversation -> session/dialog/.jsonl -> daily/YYYY-MM-DD/.md -> digest/personal | digest/procedure | digest/wiki external resource -> resource/YYYY-MM-DD/. -> daily/YYYY-MM-DD/.md -> digest/wiki | digest/procedure ``` The first two steps focus on recording and organizing; the final step focuses on long-term distillation. `auto_memory` and `auto_resource` generate daily notes from raw input, and `auto_dream` extracts and integrates digest nodes from daily. ## Markdown Format ReMe favors Markdown for memory because it works well for human reading, agent editing, and programmatic parsing. A typical memory file: ```markdown --- name: Solar Supply Chain Research description: An end-to-end view from polysilicon to modules tags: [new energy, solar] --- # Conclusions The solar supply chain consists of [[digest/wiki/polysilicon.md]], wafers, cells, and modules. One major producer is [[digest/wiki/longi.md|LONGi]]. ``` ### Frontmatter Frontmatter is a YAML block at the beginning of a file, enclosed by `---`: ```markdown --- name: Document name description: Document description source_conversation: [[session/dialog/abc.jsonl]] --- ``` The current code recognizes `name` and `description` explicitly. Other fields are preserved as additional metadata. The write interface merges `name`, `description`, and `metadata` into frontmatter. Treat frontmatter as a node-level summary and the body as evidence, explanation, and relationships. For example: ```markdown --- name: "User preference: documentation style" description: The user prefers direct, engineering-oriented technical explanations with context but without unnecessary length. kind: preference confidence: observed --- The user repeatedly asks documentation to explain motivation, boundaries, and examples while avoiding marketing language. Apply this preference when following [[digest/procedure/technical-documentation.md]]. ## Sources - [[daily/2026-06-20/session-a.md]] ``` This has three benefits: 1. `name` and `description` serve as lightweight summaries in lists, recall results, and agent decisions. 2. The body can carry fuller facts, conditions, counterexamples, and sources. 3. Ordinary wikilinks can be parsed by the graph and maintained when files move. Frontmatter is best for stable, short, structured fields; the body is best for explanations meant for people. Do not put long body text into YAML fields. ### Wikilink Wikilinks express relationships between files with `[[...]]`: ```text [[daily/2026-06-20/session.md]] [[notes/example.md#L9]] [[notes/example.md#L9-L10]] [[notes/example.md#L9-L10,L15-L20]] ``` ReMe wikilinks use **literal path semantics**: ```text [[X]] -> target_path = "X" ``` ReMe does not append `.md` automatically, search by filename, or automatically resolve folder notes. Use complete workspace-relative paths with their extensions. Ordinary Markdown links such as `[label](../wiki/example.md)` do not create `FileLink` edges and are not rewritten by move or retarget operations. Anchors such as `#L9`, `#L9-L10`, and `#L9-L10,L15-L20` remain ordinary `target_anchor` strings in the graph. The graph parser does not validate line-anchor syntax, so values such as `#L0`, `#L10-L9`, and `#L9,` are also stored. The `read` job does not interpret an anchor appended to `path`; use the separate 1-based, inclusive `start_line` and `end_line` arguments to read a range, for example `read(path="digest/wiki/solar.md", start_line=9, end_line=10)`. Wikilinks support these behaviors: ```text body link -> create a FileLink move a file -> rewrite [[old path]] in inbound edges by default delete a file -> return remaining inbound edges so references can be cleaned up search match -> expand inbound and outbound links to provide context ``` Parsed result: ```text FileLink source_path = current file target_path = notes/example.md target_anchor = L9-L10,L15-L20 ``` Older documents containing wrappers such as `related:: [[path]]`, `- related:: [[path]]`, or `[related:: [[path]]]` remain readable. ReMe ignores the surrounding text and indexes the inner `[[path]]` as an ordinary link. After upgrading from a version that stored typed links, run `reme reindex` once to rebuild the derived graph without the removed relationship field. ### Sources and Relationships The two most important link types in ReMe are source links and conceptual relationship links. A Sources section records where a long-term memory came from: ```markdown ## Sources - [[daily/2026-06-20/session-a.md]] - [[resource/2026-06-20/report.pdf]] ``` A conceptual relationship link explains which other long-term memories relate to the node. Weave it into natural prose: ```markdown This analysis extends [[digest/wiki/solar-supply-chain.md]], follows [[digest/procedure/research-report-analysis.md]], and contrasts with [[digest/wiki/central-inverter.md]]. ``` ## Human and Agent Editing Because memory is stored as files, users can edit the workspace directly, while agents can read and write the same files through ReMe's file tools. Both follow the same conventions: | Operation | Guidance | |---|---| | Add memory | Write to the appropriate directory, use frontmatter for Markdown, and prefer complete workspace-relative wikilinks. | | Edit a body | Preserve existing sources and important wikilinks. When correcting an old conclusion, explain how the new material changes the previous judgment. | | Move a file | ReMe's move tool rewrites old paths in inbound edges by default. After a manual move, inspect inbound links again. | | Delete a file | Check inbound links first. ReMe's delete tool returns source files that still point to the target, making dangling references easier to clean up. | | Edit metadata | Use frontmatter for short fields. When the body changes substantially, update `description` as well. | A practical rule is: **an agent may rewrite the wording, but it must not lose evidence edges**. In particular, Sources entries and existing digest-to-digest wikilinks are the basis for traceable and extensible long-term memory. ## Path Semantics All file tools and wikilinks use workspace-relative paths as their basic unit: ```text digest/wiki/solar.md daily/2026-06-20/session-a.md resource/2026-06-20/report.pdf ``` This creates a clear boundary: ReMe does not treat `[[solar]]` as a repository-wide title search and does not assume Obsidian-style same-name resolution. `[[digest/wiki/solar.md]]` points to that exact path. Recommended practices: 1. Include `.md` when linking a Markdown file. 2. Use the complete source path when linking from digest to daily or resource. 3. Rename or move files through ReMe's move tool whenever possible to avoid stale paths. 4. Put external source material under `resource/YYYY-MM-DD/...` and long-term abstractions under `digest/...`. Do not put raw source material directly into digest. Explicit path semantics sacrifice a little convenience when writing by hand, but provide predictability, portability, and automatic maintainability. ## Memory Chunking Memory chunking divides a file into retrievable fragments. ReMe does not split Markdown at fixed lengths by default; it tries to preserve semantic structure. This section explains how files become retrieval chunks. For index updates, BM25, vector recall, and link expansion, see [Memory Search](./memory_search.md). Traditional RAG often uses fixed-window splitting: ```text Document | | every N tokens + overlap v chunk 1 | chunk 2 | chunk 3 | ... ``` This is simple, but it can cut headings, tables, code blocks, lists, and `[[wikilinks]]` in the middle. After a match, the agent often sees only an isolated fragment without knowing its section or relationship to other memory nodes. ReMe chunking is closer to splitting memory by file structure: ```text Markdown file | | frontmatter + headings + blocks + wikilinks v semantic chunks with document skeleton ``` Comparison: ```text traditional RAG chunk = fixed-length text fragment + overlap ReMe memory chunk = section structure + body fragment + line range + wikilink relationship context ``` Markdown files use `MarkdownFileChunker`: ```text Markdown | | mistletoe AST v Document └─ H1 section ├─ paragraph / list / table / code └─ H2 section └─ ... | v FileChunk[] ``` Chunking rules: ```text 1. Parse frontmatter first; send the body to the chunker separately. 2. Build a section tree from heading levels. 3. Prefer one complete section per chunk. 4. When a section is too long, recursively split its subsections and body blocks. 5. Repeat table headers when splitting tables. 6. Repeat the fence when splitting code blocks. 7. Pack lists by item. 8. Only then split greedily by line and add [Part X/N]. ``` By default, every chunk includes its heading skeleton: ```text # Top-level heading ## Current section Matched body fragment ## Following section heading ``` This lets the agent see not only an isolated paragraph but also its structural position in the source file. Non-Markdown files use `DefaultFileChunker` by default. It splits by byte size and preserves a small overlap. For Markdown, the chunker also avoids cutting `[[wikilinks]]` in the middle.