mirror of
https://github.com/abhigyanpatwari/GitNexus.git
synced 2026-09-07 08:26:11 +00:00
Some checks are pending
CodeQL / Analyze (javascript-typescript) (push) Waiting to run
CodeQL / Analyze (python) (push) Waiting to run
Gitleaks / gitleaks (push) Waiting to run
Publish / Classify release event (push) Waiting to run
Publish / RC guard (marker + release-PR skip) (push) Blocked by required conditions
Publish / ci (push) Blocked by required conditions
Publish / Publish to npm (push) Blocked by required conditions
Publish / Build & Push RC Docker images (push) Blocked by required conditions
Scorecard / Scorecard analysis (push) Waiting to run
Trivy Image Scan / Trivy (gitnexus-cli) (push) Waiting to run
Trivy Image Scan / Trivy (gitnexus-web) (push) Waiting to run
* feat(cfg): model Java value-position switch as control flow (#2207) A value-position `switch` expression with ≥2 arms is now modeled as a CFG dispatch in the two highest-value carriers, instead of collapsing the owning statement to a single inline block: - `var x = switch (k) { … }` — the arms become real blocks reached by `switch-case` edges and rejoin at a binding continuation that carries the declared name's def (uses stay on the arm blocks). - `return switch (k) { … }` — each arm returns the function result, threading every active finalizer. This makes the arms control-dependent on the dispatch (the point of #2207 — they previously produced zero CDG), mirroring the Kotlin / Rust value-position binding pattern. `breaksBlock` routes a value-switch declaration out of `visitSeq` coalescing; `visitReturn` and `visitStmt` gain the carrier handling; `java-harvest` gains `bindingDefFacts`. An assignment RHS (`x = switch …`), a call argument, and a multi- declarator decl remain inline (documented gap). Java has no value- position `if` (the ternary is excluded, like Kotlin's elvis). Verified: 51 java-visitor tests (4 new), full CFG unit+integration suites (661) green, CDG snapshot byte-identical, bench --check PASS. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(cfg): model C# value-position switch expression as control flow (#2207) A C# `switch_expression` (`k switch { p => v, … }`) with ≥2 arms is now modeled as a CFG `switch-case` dispatch — a discriminant block, each arm value a block reached by a dispatch edge, all arms rejoining at one exit — in the three value-position carriers, instead of collapsing the owning construct to a single inline block: - `var x = k switch { … }` — arms rejoin at a binding continuation that carries the declared name's def (discriminant + arm uses on the arms). - `return k switch { … }` — each arm returns the function result, threading every active finalizer. - `=> k switch { … }` expression-bodied member — each arm returns. The arms are now control-dependent on the discriminant (the point of #2207 — they previously produced zero CDG). Arm patterns / `when` guards are harvested as conditional uses on the dispatch; an unguarded `_`/`var` arm is the exhaustive catch-all (a non-exhaustive switch keeps EXIT reachable via a no-match edge). `switch_expression` is distinct from `switch_statement`, so this adds a dedicated `visitSwitchExpr`. An assignment RHS (`x = k switch …`), a call argument, and a multi- declarator decl remain inline (documented gap). `csharp-harvest` gains `bindingDefFacts`. Verified: 47 csharp-visitor tests (4 new), full CFG unit+integration suites (664) green, CDG snapshot byte-identical, bench --check PASS. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(cfg): model PHP value-position match expression as control flow (#2207) A PHP `match($v) { c => v, default => v }` with ≥2 arms is now modeled as a CFG `switch-case` dispatch — a discriminant block, each arm value a block reached by a dispatch edge, all arms rejoining at one exit (no fallthrough) — in the two value-position carriers, instead of collapsing the owning statement to one inline block: - `$x = match($v) { … }` — the dominant PHP idiom (no typed local decl): arms rejoin at a binding continuation carrying the assignment target's def (condition + arm uses on the arms). - `return match($v) { … }` — each arm returns the function result, threading every active finally. The arms are now control-dependent on the discriminant (the point of #2207). Arm `match_condition_list`s are harvested as conditional uses on the dispatch; a `default` arm is the catch-all (a defaultless `match` throws UnhandledMatchError, kept EXIT-reachable via a no-match edge). `php-harvest` gains `assignmentDefFacts`. A `match` in a call argument / nested subexpression stays inline; the ternary `?:` is excluded by design (a micro-branch, like elvis). Verified: 37 php-visitor tests (3 new), CDG snapshot byte-identical, bench --check PASS. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(cfg): model Dart value-position switch expression as control flow (#2207) A Dart 3 value-position `switch (v) { p => e, _ => e }` with ≥2 arms is now modeled as a CFG `switch-case` dispatch — a discriminant block, each arm value a block reached by a dispatch edge, all arms rejoining at one exit (no fallthrough) — in the two value-position carriers, instead of collapsing the owning statement to one inline block: - `var x = switch (v) { … }` — single-binding decl; arms rejoin at a binding continuation carrying the declared name's def. - `return switch (v) { … }` — each arm returns the function result, threading every active finalizer. The arms are now control-dependent on the discriminant (the point of #2207). A Dart call value parses as `identifier` + `selector` (multiple children, not one node), so the arm-value facts come from a dedicated `switchExprArmValueFacts`; arm patterns harvest conditionally onto the dispatch; a `_` arm is the catch-all (a non-exhaustive switch keeps EXIT reachable via a no-match edge). `dart-harvest` gains `bindingDefFacts` + the arm value/pattern fact helpers. A `switch_expression` in a call argument / multi-binding decl stays inline (its conditional arm sub-evaluation remains the #2206 harvest may-def path, re-pointed in the regression test). `?:`/`??`/`?.` excluded by design. Verified: 39 dart-visitor tests (4 new), CDG snapshot byte-identical, bench --check PASS. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(cfg): model Swift value-position if/switch as control flow (#2207) A Swift 5.9 value-position `if`/`switch` is now modeled as control flow in the two value-position carriers, instead of collapsing the owning statement to one inline block: - `let x = if … else … / switch v { … }` — arms rejoin at a binding continuation carrying the declared name's def (condition + arm uses on the branch blocks). - `return if … / switch …` — each arm returns the function result, threading every active finalizer. The arms are now control-dependent on the branch (the point of #2207). tree-sitter-swift reuses `if_statement` / `switch_statement` for the value form (no separate `if_expression`/`switch_expression`), so the existing `visitIf`/`visitSwitch` are reused — this mirrors the Kotlin carrier exactly. `swift-harvest` gains `bindingDefFacts`. A value-position `if` requires an `else`; a value `switch` needs ≥2 entries. A value branch in a call argument / interpolation stays inline; `?:`/`??` are excluded by design. Verified: 31 swift-visitor tests (4 new), CDG snapshot byte-identical, bench --check PASS. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(cfg): model Kotlin assignment-RHS and value-position try as control flow (#2205) Completes the value-position branch carriers #2205 left deferred after the initial val/var-binding + return + expr-body work: - `x = when (k) { … }` / `x = if (c) a else b` / `x = try { … }` — a plain `=` assignment whose RHS is a modelable branch now models the arms as control flow and binds the LHS target at the rejoin (a compound `+=` and a plain-call RHS stay inline). - `val x = try { … } catch { … }` — a value-position `try` is now a modelable value branch (reusing visitTry), so the binding/assignment carriers route it through control flow too. The arms are now control-dependent on the branch (the point of #2205). `isModelableValueBranch` gains `try_expression`; `visitBranchExpr` routes it to `visitTry`; `isControlFlow`/`visitStmt` gain the `assignment` carrier; `kotlin-harvest` gains `assignmentDefFacts`. A branch nested in a call argument (`f(when …)`) stays inline (the direct value is the call); `?:`/`?.` micro-branches excluded by design. The `return try { … }` carrier is intentionally left out (finalizer-threading in return position is risky and was not requested). Verified: 43 kotlin-visitor tests (5 new), full CFG unit+integration suites (676) green, CDG snapshot byte-identical, bench --check PASS. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(cfg): Java colon-form value switch — yield ends the arm, no fallthrough (#2211) Tri-review (adversarial + correctness lanes) found that a value-position colon-form switch expression — `int x = switch(k){ case 1: yield a(); case 2: yield b(); }` (valid Java 14+) — reused the statement `visitSwitch` fallthrough logic, wiring a spurious `fallthrough` edge between the yield-terminated colon groups. A switch EXPRESSION never falls through between arms; the false edge dropped an arm's control-dependence edge and added a false reaching-defs propagation edge (verified by a real-parser probe). Arrow-form value switches were already correct. Root cause: `visitYield` modeled `yield e;` as a block that CONTINUES to the next statement. Semantically `yield` produces the switch-expression's value and EXITS the switch. Fix: `visitYield` now terminates the arm, jumping to the enclosing switch's exit and threading any finalizer it crosses — exactly like a `break` out of the switch, but carrying the yielded value's facts. Adds `ControlFlowContext.resolveYield()` (nearest SWITCH frame, never an intervening loop). `yield` is Java-only here (C# `yield return` is iterator semantics, untouched). Tests: a colon-form value switch asserting NO `fallthrough` edge and that BOTH arms are control-dependent on the dispatch (specific controller→ dependent pairs), plus a `return switch(…)` inside `try/finally` asserting `finally-return` threading per arm. Verified: full CFG unit+integration suites green, CDG snapshot byte- identical, bench --check PASS. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(cfg): Dart value switch — guarded `_` is not a catch-all; guard is a dispatch test (#2211) Tri-review (adversarial + correctness lanes) found two issues in the Dart `visitSwitchExpr` value-position modeling: 1. Catch-all detection was `pattern.text === '_'`, ignoring guards. A guarded `_ when c => …` is NOT exhaustive (Dart throws at runtime if no arm + guard matches), so falsely treating it as a catch-all suppressed the conservative no-match edge — asserting an exhaustive switch that isn't. The sibling C# visitor already gated catch-all on `!guard`. 2. A `when` guard parses as a bare sibling between the pattern and the value (no wrapper node), so it fell into the arm-VALUE children and was harvested as an unconditional arm-value use instead of a conditional dispatch test. Fix: new `armParts()` splits a `switch_expression_case` at the `=>` token into pattern / guard(s) / value(s). The pattern AND guard are harvested conditionally onto the dispatch block (they evaluate before the body, only when earlier arms missed); the arm-value facts come from the post-`=>` children only; the catch-all is gated on an unguarded `_`. Removes the now- unused dart-harvest `switchExprArm{Value,Pattern}Facts` (the visitor harvests per-child via the existing `facts`/`factsConditional`). Tests: a guarded value switch asserting the no-match edge is present (3 switch-case successors from the dispatch) and EXIT stays reachable, plus a test that the guard's use is recorded on the dispatch block, not an arm. Verified: full CFG suites green, CDG snapshot byte-identical, bench --check PASS. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(cfg): Kotlin return try {…} models the value-position try (#2205, #2211) Tri-review (maintainability + testing lanes) caught a doc-vs-code mismatch: the visitor header documents a `return <branch>` carrier that includes `try`, but `visitReturn` only matched `when_expression`/`if_expression`, so `return try { … } catch { … }` fell through to the single inline-block path — its arms were not modeled. Fix: `visitReturn` now also matches `try_expression`, making the `return` carrier uniform with the binding / assignment / expression-body carriers (all route a value-position `try` through `isModelableValueBranch` → `visitTry`, threading the active finalizers per arm). No new machinery — just completes the carrier set the docstring already claimed. Tests: `return try {…} catch {…}` (throw + return edges, CDG-bearing, EXIT reachable) and `x = try {…} catch {…}` assignment-RHS (the assignment carrier's try path, previously untested). Verified: full CFG suites green, CDG snapshot byte-identical, bench --check PASS. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(cfg): cover the no-match edge of non-exhaustive C#/PHP value switches (#2211) The testing lane noted the `hasCatchAll`/`hasDefault === false` branch — where a value-position `switch`/`match` with no catch-all/default arm adds a conservative no-match edge so EXIT stays reachable — was untested (every existing fixture used a `_`/`default` arm). Adds a C# `x switch { 1 => …, 2 => … }` and a PHP `match($x){ 1 => …, 2 => … }` (no default) test, each asserting the dispatch fans to (arms + 1) `switch-case` successors and `isExitReachableFromAllBlocks` holds. Verified: full CFG suites green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(cfg): clarify Kotlin value-position try gate covers the finally-only path (#2211) Tri-review (maintainability lane) noted the inline comment at the `try_expression` branch of `isModelableValueBranch` said only "a catch's value", but the gate fires on `catch_block || finally_block`. Reword to acknowledge that a value-position `try` with a `catch` OR a `finally` is a modelable branch. Comment-only; no behavior change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(cfg): document the deliberate C# declaratorInit duplication (#2211) Tri-review (maintainability lane) flagged the byte-identical `declaratorInit` helper in `csharp.ts` (visitor) and `csharp-harvest.ts` (harvester). The two are standalone classes with no shared base (repo convention) and the only module both import is the generic `utils/ast-helpers` (types only) — not a home for a C#-grammar-specific helper. Resolve the lowest-risk way: a cross-reference comment at each definition noting the deliberate duplication and the keep-in-sync requirement. No new shared module; no behavior change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * refactor(cfg): unwrap the paren in Dart visitSwitch for dispatch consistency (#2211) Tri-review (maintainability lane) noted `visitSwitch` (statement form) used the raw parenthesized `condition` (dispatch text `switch (x)`) while the new `visitSwitchExpr` unwraps it (`switch x`). Probed the vendored tree-sitter-dart: the `switch_statement` condition IS a `parenthesized_expression`, so apply `unwrapParen` in `visitSwitch` too. The harvest walks into the paren either way, so the discriminant's def/use facts are unchanged — only the dispatch block's text string normalizes. Verified byte-identical (cdg-snapshot + bench --check unchanged; the Dart unit tests assert topology, not block text). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(cfg): Swift single-entry value switch stays inline (#2211) Tri-review (testing lane) noted the existing Swift "stays inline" test used a plain call (`let x = g()`), which never exercises the single-entry switch gate. Add a real one-entry value switch (`let x = switch v { default: g() }`) asserting it coalesces (no switch-case edge), pinning the `>= 2` switch_entry threshold in `isModelableValueBranch`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(cfg): cover the Kotlin expression-body try carrier (#2205, #2211) Tri-review (testing lane) noted the `fun f() = try { … } catch { … }` expression-body carrier (visitExprBody -> isModelableValueBranch accepting try_expression) existed but was untested. Add a regression asserting the expr-body try is modeled (throw + return edges, CDG-bearing, EXIT reachable). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(cfg): pin the value-branch carriers never throw on a truncated AST (R4) (#2211) Tri-review (adversarial lane) noted the new value-position branch carriers must return undefined / never throw on a malformed AST, or a single bad function would drop the whole file's CFG group (the R4 invariant). Add a per-language regression feeding a TRUNCATED value-branch carrier (an unterminated `var x = switch/match/if/when (…)`) through the existing `collectFunctions` + `buildFunctionCfg(...).not.toThrow()` graceful-undefined harness, for all six languages whose value-branch path is new (Java/C#/PHP/Dart/Swift/Kotlin). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
646 lines
28 KiB
TypeScript
646 lines
28 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest';
|
|
import { createRequire } from 'node:module';
|
|
import { createJavaCfgVisitor } from '../../../src/core/ingestion/cfg/visitors/java.js';
|
|
import type { FunctionCfg } from '../../../src/core/ingestion/cfg/types.js';
|
|
import {
|
|
makeCfgHarness,
|
|
type CfgHarness,
|
|
block,
|
|
edgeKinds,
|
|
reaches,
|
|
reachable,
|
|
bindingIdx,
|
|
allSites,
|
|
hasAnySites,
|
|
} from '../../helpers/cfg-harness.js';
|
|
import { isExitReachableFromAllBlocks } from '../../../src/core/ingestion/cfg/post-dominators.js';
|
|
import { computeControlDependence } from '../../../src/core/ingestion/cfg/control-dependence.js';
|
|
|
|
// U4 — the Java CfgVisitor, one hazard per test (KTD5: real-parser regression,
|
|
// NOT snapshot-pinning). Each fixture's distinctive statement text (step(),
|
|
// done(), handle(e), …) lets us locate the block for a region by text and assert
|
|
// the control-flow topology around it.
|
|
|
|
const javaGrammar = createRequire(import.meta.url)('tree-sitter-java') as Parameters<
|
|
typeof makeCfgHarness
|
|
>[0];
|
|
|
|
const java: CfgHarness = makeCfgHarness(javaGrammar, createJavaCfgVisitor(), 'fixture.java');
|
|
|
|
const hasDef = (cfg: FunctionCfg, idx: number): boolean =>
|
|
cfg.blocks.some((bl) => bl.statements?.some((s) => s.defs.includes(idx)));
|
|
const hasUse = (cfg: FunctionCfg, idx: number): boolean =>
|
|
cfg.blocks.some((bl) => bl.statements?.some((s) => s.uses.includes(idx)));
|
|
const hasMayDef = (cfg: FunctionCfg, idx: number): boolean =>
|
|
cfg.blocks.some((bl) => bl.statements?.some((s) => (s.mayDefs ?? []).includes(idx)));
|
|
|
|
const wrap = (body: string): string => `class C { void m(int x) { ${body} } }`;
|
|
|
|
describe('Java CfgVisitor — structure', () => {
|
|
it('straight-line body: ENTRY → block → EXIT (seq)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m() { a(); b(); c(); } }`);
|
|
expect(cfg.blocks.filter((b) => b.kind === 'normal')).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
const body = block(cfg, 'a();');
|
|
expect(cfg.edges).toContainEqual({ from: cfg.entryIndex, to: body, kind: 'seq' });
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, body, cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('empty body: ENTRY → EXIT', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m() {} }`);
|
|
expect(cfg.blocks).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, cfg.entryIndex, cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('constructor, compact constructor, and lambda are CFG-bearing functions', () => {
|
|
const cfgs = java.cfgsOf(
|
|
`class C { C(int a) { this.x = a; } void outer() { Runnable r = () -> { go(); }; r.run(); } }`,
|
|
);
|
|
// constructor C, outer, and the lambda = 3 CFGs.
|
|
expect(cfgs.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(3);
|
|
for (const cfg of cfgs) expect(reaches(cfg, cfg.entryIndex, cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('record compact constructor is CFG-bearing', () => {
|
|
const cfgs = java.cfgsOf(`record R(int a) { R { if (a < 0) throw new RuntimeException(); } }`);
|
|
expect(cfgs.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
|
|
for (const cfg of cfgs) expect(reachable(cfg, cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('single-expression lambda: one block returns its value', () => {
|
|
const cfgs = java.cfgsOf(
|
|
`class C { void m() { java.util.function.Function<Integer,Integer> f = z -> z * 2; f.apply(1); } }`,
|
|
);
|
|
// The lambda's OWN cfg has a single body block whose text IS exactly the
|
|
// expression (the enclosing method's block contains the whole lambda source).
|
|
const lambda = cfgs.find((c) => c.blocks.some((b) => b.text === 'z * 2'));
|
|
expect(lambda).toBeDefined();
|
|
const body = lambda!.blocks.find((b) => b.text === 'z * 2')!.index;
|
|
expect(lambda!.edges).toContainEqual({ from: body, to: lambda!.exitIndex, kind: 'return' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('abstract method (no body) → graceful undefined, no throw', () => {
|
|
const root = java.parse(`abstract class C { abstract void m(); }`);
|
|
const fns = java.collectFunctions(root);
|
|
for (const fn of fns) {
|
|
expect(() => createJavaCfgVisitor().buildFunctionCfg(fn, 'f.java')).not.toThrow();
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Java CfgVisitor — branching', () => {
|
|
it('if/else: cond-true to then, cond-false to else, both reach the join', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(wrap(`if (x > 0) { a(); } else { b(); } c();`));
|
|
const kinds = edgeKinds(cfg);
|
|
expect(kinds.has('cond-true')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(kinds.has('cond-false')).toBe(true);
|
|
const join = block(cfg, 'c();');
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'a();'), join)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'b();'), join)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('else if chains through the nested alternative (no else_clause wrapper)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(
|
|
`class C { void m(int x) { if (x > 0) { a(); } else if (x < 0) { b(); } else { c(); } } }`,
|
|
);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'a();'), cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'b();'), cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'c();'), cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Java CfgVisitor — loops', () => {
|
|
it('while loop: header + back-edge + exit', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(int x) { while (x > 0) { step(); } done(); } }`);
|
|
const header = block(cfg, 'x > 0');
|
|
const body = block(cfg, 'step();');
|
|
expect(cfg.edges).toContainEqual({ from: body, to: header, kind: 'loop-back' });
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('cond-true')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, header, block(cfg, 'done();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('do-while runs the body BEFORE testing, then loops back from the bottom', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(int x) { do { step(); } while (x > 0); done(); } }`);
|
|
const body = block(cfg, 'step();');
|
|
const cond = block(cfg, 'x > 0');
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, cfg.entryIndex, body)).toBe(true); // body runs first
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, body, cond)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(cfg.edges).toContainEqual({ from: cond, to: body, kind: 'loop-back' });
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, cond, block(cfg, 'done();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('classic for: init once, condition header, back-edge through update', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(
|
|
`class C { void m(int n) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { step(); } done(); } }`,
|
|
);
|
|
const init = block(cfg, 'int i = 0');
|
|
const header = block(cfg, 'i < n');
|
|
const incr = block(cfg, 'i++');
|
|
const body = block(cfg, 'step();');
|
|
expect(cfg.edges).toContainEqual({ from: cfg.entryIndex, to: init, kind: 'seq' });
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, body, incr)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(cfg.edges).toContainEqual({ from: incr, to: header, kind: 'loop-back' });
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, header, block(cfg, 'done();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('enhanced for (for-each): header + body + loop-back + exit; loop var is a def', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(int[] xs) { for (int v : xs) { use(v); } done(); } }`);
|
|
const body = block(cfg, 'use(v);');
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('cond-true')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('loop-back')).toBe(true);
|
|
const header = cfg.edges.find((e) => e.kind === 'loop-back' && e.from === body)?.to;
|
|
expect(header).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, header!, block(cfg, 'done();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
const v = bindingIdx(cfg, 'v');
|
|
expect(hasDef(cfg, v)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('while (true) {} keeps EXIT reverse-reachable AND emits CDG > 0', () => {
|
|
// The inner `if` is a real control point; assert through the production
|
|
// post-dom/CDG passes (matching go/python/ruby/rust/vue) — CDG is only
|
|
// computed when EXIT stays reverse-reachable, so a non-empty CDG proves the
|
|
// structural exit-escape edge keeps the function CDG-bearing.
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(boolean x) { while (true) { if (x) { g(); } } } }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('cond-false')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(isExitReachableFromAllBlocks(cfg)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(computeControlDependence(cfg).edges.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('for (;;) {} keeps EXIT reverse-reachable AND emits CDG > 0', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(boolean x) { for (;;) { if (x) { g(); } } } }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('cond-false')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(isExitReachableFromAllBlocks(cfg)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(computeControlDependence(cfg).edges.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Java CfgVisitor — labeled break/continue', () => {
|
|
it('break outer; from a nested loop targets the labeled (outer) frame', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m() {
|
|
outer:
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
|
|
for (int j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
|
|
if (hit()) break outer;
|
|
inner();
|
|
}
|
|
afterInner();
|
|
}
|
|
done();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('break')).toBe(true);
|
|
const brk = block(cfg, 'break outer;');
|
|
// The labeled break skips past BOTH loops to the post-outer-loop continuation
|
|
// (done()), not just the inner loop's exit (afterInner()).
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, brk, block(cfg, 'done();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
// It must NOT route back into the outer loop body's afterInner().
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, brk, block(cfg, 'afterInner();'))).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('continue outer; from a nested loop continues the labeled (outer) loop', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m() {
|
|
outer:
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
|
|
for (int j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
|
|
if (skip()) continue outer;
|
|
inner();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
done();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('continue')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'continue outer;'), block(cfg, 'i < 3'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('unlabeled break does NOT match a labeled BLOCK frame', () => {
|
|
// `blk:` labels a plain block; an UNLABELED break here is a compile error in
|
|
// real Java, but the CFG must still route it to EXIT (no labeled-block match),
|
|
// and a labeled `break blk;` must reach the post-block join.
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m() {
|
|
blk: {
|
|
if (cond()) break blk;
|
|
work();
|
|
}
|
|
done();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
const brk = block(cfg, 'break blk;');
|
|
// labeled break reaches the join after the labeled block (done()).
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, brk, block(cfg, 'done();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
// work() after the break is still reachable (false arm of the if).
|
|
expect(reachable(cfg, block(cfg, 'work();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Java CfgVisitor — switch', () => {
|
|
it('classic colon switch: break-terminated case rejoins, fallthrough on break-less', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(int x) {
|
|
switch (x) {
|
|
case 1: one(); break;
|
|
case 2: two(); break;
|
|
default: other();
|
|
}
|
|
after();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('switch-case')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'one();'), block(cfg, 'after();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'two();'), block(cfg, 'after();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
// break-terminated case 1 does not fall into case 2.
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'one();'), block(cfg, 'two();'))).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('empty colon case falls through to the next case (fallthrough edge)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(int x) {
|
|
switch (x) { case 1: case 2: shared(); break; default: d(); }
|
|
after();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'shared();'), block(cfg, 'after();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('switch-case')).toBe(true);
|
|
// a break-less default flows to after().
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'd();'), block(cfg, 'after();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a non-break case FALLS THROUGH to the next case (classic semantics)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(int x) {
|
|
switch (x) { case 1: one(); case 2: two(); break; default: d(); }
|
|
after();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
// case 1 has no break → it falls into case 2's body.
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'one();'), block(cfg, 'two();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('fallthrough')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('arrow switch: each rule rejoins after the switch, no fallthrough', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(int x) {
|
|
switch (x) {
|
|
case 1 -> a();
|
|
case 2, 3 -> b();
|
|
default -> c();
|
|
}
|
|
after();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('switch-case')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'a();'), block(cfg, 'after();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'b();'), block(cfg, 'after();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
// arrow rule a() does NOT fall into b().
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'a();'), block(cfg, 'b();'))).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('fallthrough')).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('switch case-test is recorded as a may-def/use on the dispatch block', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(int x, int k) {
|
|
switch (x) { case 1: a(); break; default: b(); }
|
|
} }`);
|
|
// The dispatch block (switch value `x`) uses x; the case-test constants carry
|
|
// no bindings, but a value-bearing dispatch records the discriminant use.
|
|
const x = bindingIdx(cfg, 'x');
|
|
expect(hasUse(cfg, x)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('value-position switch declaration is modeled as a dispatch, def bound at the join (#2207)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { int m(int x) {
|
|
int r = switch (x) { case 1 -> 10; default -> { yield 20; } };
|
|
use(r);
|
|
} }`);
|
|
// The arms are now real CFG blocks reached by switch-case dispatch edges.
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('switch-case')).toBe(true);
|
|
// Each arm rejoins and reaches the use of the bound result.
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, '10'), block(cfg, 'use(r);'))).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'yield 20;'), block(cfg, 'use(r);'))).toBe(true);
|
|
// `r` is defined (at the continuation) and used downstream — the chain is live.
|
|
const r = bindingIdx(cfg, 'r');
|
|
expect(hasDef(cfg, r)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(hasUse(cfg, r)).toBe(true);
|
|
// Modeling the arms yields control dependence (the whole point of #2207).
|
|
expect(computeControlDependence(cfg).edges.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(isExitReachableFromAllBlocks(cfg)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, cfg.entryIndex, cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('return switch (…) {…} models each arm as returning the function result (#2207)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { int m(int x) {
|
|
return switch (x) { case 1 -> a(); case 2 -> b(); default -> c(); };
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('switch-case')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('return')).toBe(true);
|
|
// every arm reaches EXIT (its value IS the returned result).
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'a()'), cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'c()'), cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(computeControlDependence(cfg).edges.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(isExitReachableFromAllBlocks(cfg)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('value-position switch with ONE group stays inline (no real control dependence)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { int m(int x) {
|
|
int r = switch (x) { default -> 0; };
|
|
use(r);
|
|
} }`);
|
|
// A single-arm switch carries no branch — it coalesces into the declaration block.
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('switch-case')).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, cfg.entryIndex, cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('assignment-RHS value switch stays inline (documented remaining gap)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { int m(int x) {
|
|
int r = 0;
|
|
r = switch (x) { case 1 -> 10; default -> 20; };
|
|
use(r);
|
|
} }`);
|
|
// Only declaration / return carriers are modeled; an assignment RHS coalesces.
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('switch-case')).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, cfg.entryIndex, cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('statement switch with a yield arm builds a dispatch with a yield block', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { int m(int x) {
|
|
switch (x) {
|
|
case 1: yield 10;
|
|
default: yield 20;
|
|
}
|
|
} }`);
|
|
// statement-position switch breaks a block → switch-case dispatch edges.
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('switch-case')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('colon-form value switch: yield ends the arm, NO fallthrough; every arm is CDG-dependent (#2211)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { int m(int k) {
|
|
int x = switch (k) { case 1: yield one(); case 2: yield two(); default: yield zero(); };
|
|
use(x);
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('switch-case')).toBe(true);
|
|
// a `yield` exits the switch — it does NOT fall through to the next colon group.
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('fallthrough')).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'one()'), block(cfg, 'two()'))).toBe(false);
|
|
// every arm rejoins and reaches the downstream use of the bound result.
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'one()'), block(cfg, 'use(x);'))).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'two()'), block(cfg, 'use(x);'))).toBe(true);
|
|
// each arm is control-dependent on the dispatch — pin the SPECIFIC pairs.
|
|
const dispatch = block(cfg, 'k');
|
|
const cdg = computeControlDependence(cfg);
|
|
expect(
|
|
cdg.edges.some(
|
|
(e) => e.controllerBlock === dispatch && e.dependentBlock === block(cfg, 'one()'),
|
|
),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(
|
|
cdg.edges.some(
|
|
(e) => e.controllerBlock === dispatch && e.dependentBlock === block(cfg, 'two()'),
|
|
),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(isExitReachableFromAllBlocks(cfg)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('return switch (…) inside try/finally threads the finalizer per arm (#2211)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { int m(int k) {
|
|
try {
|
|
return switch (k) { case 1 -> a(); default -> b(); };
|
|
} finally { cleanup(); }
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('switch-case')).toBe(true);
|
|
// each arm's return threads the finally before EXIT.
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('finally-return')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'a()'), block(cfg, 'cleanup();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'b()'), block(cfg, 'cleanup();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(isExitReachableFromAllBlocks(cfg)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Java CfgVisitor — try / catch / finally / try-with-resources', () => {
|
|
it('try/catch: a throw edge runs from each protected block to the handler', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m() {
|
|
try { risky(); deeper(); } catch (java.lang.Exception e) { handle(e); }
|
|
after();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('throw')).toBe(true);
|
|
const handler = block(cfg, 'handle(e);');
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, block(cfg, 'risky();'), handler)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reachable(cfg, block(cfg, 'after();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('finally runs on normal completion of the try', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m() {
|
|
try { work(); } finally { cleanup(); }
|
|
after();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
const body = block(cfg, 'work();');
|
|
const fin = block(cfg, 'cleanup();');
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, body, fin)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, fin, block(cfg, 'after();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('return crossing a finally emits a finally-return completion edge', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { int m() {
|
|
try { return compute(); } finally { cleanup(); }
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('finally-return')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('break crossing a finally emits a finally-break completion edge', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(int n) {
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
try { if (done()) break; } finally { tick(); }
|
|
}
|
|
after();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('finally-break')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('try-with-resources closes resources on the NORMAL exit path', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m() {
|
|
try (var r = open()) { read(r); }
|
|
after();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
const body = block(cfg, 'read(r);');
|
|
const close = block(cfg, 'close');
|
|
// body → close → after() (normal completion threads through the close).
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, body, close)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, close, block(cfg, 'after();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('try-with-resources closes resources on the EXCEPTION path too', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m() {
|
|
try (var r = open()) { risky(r); }
|
|
} }`);
|
|
const body = block(cfg, 'risky(r);');
|
|
const close = block(cfg, 'close');
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('throw')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, body, close)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a return inside try-with-resources crosses the close (finally-return)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { int m() {
|
|
try (var r = open()) { return read(r); }
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('finally-return')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('multi-catch (A | B) binds the exception name as a def in the handler', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m() {
|
|
try { x(); } catch (java.io.IOException | java.lang.RuntimeException e) { handle(e); }
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('throw')).toBe(true);
|
|
const e = bindingIdx(cfg, 'e');
|
|
expect(hasDef(cfg, e)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Java CfgVisitor — synchronized (deterministic finalizer)', () => {
|
|
it('synchronized body runs then releases the monitor on the normal path', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(Object lock) {
|
|
synchronized (lock) { touch(); }
|
|
after();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
const body = block(cfg, 'touch();');
|
|
const release = block(cfg, 'release');
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, body, release)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, release, block(cfg, 'after();'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('synchronized releases the monitor on the exception path (throw → release)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(Object lock) { synchronized (lock) { risky(); } } }`);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('throw')).toBe(true);
|
|
const body = block(cfg, 'risky();');
|
|
const release = block(cfg, 'release');
|
|
expect(reaches(cfg, body, release)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a return inside synchronized crosses the release (finally-return)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(
|
|
`class C { int m(Object lock) { synchronized (lock) { return get(); } } }`,
|
|
);
|
|
expect(edgeKinds(cfg).has('finally-return')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Java CfgVisitor — def/use harvest', () => {
|
|
it('local declaration: int x = a + b; use(x); → def of x + use of x', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(int a, int b) { int x = a + b; use(x); } }`);
|
|
const x = bindingIdx(cfg, 'x');
|
|
expect(hasDef(cfg, x)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(hasUse(cfg, x)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('bare uninitialized local is NOT a def until assigned', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m() { int x; x = 5; use(x); } }`);
|
|
const x = bindingIdx(cfg, 'x');
|
|
// the assignment defines x; the declaration alone does not.
|
|
expect(hasDef(cfg, x)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(hasUse(cfg, x)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a && (x = g()) records x as a may-def inside the short-circuit', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(
|
|
`class C { void m(boolean a) { int x = 0; if (a && (x = g()) > 0) h(x); } }`,
|
|
);
|
|
const x = bindingIdx(cfg, 'x');
|
|
expect(hasMayDef(cfg, x)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('ternary arms record their writes as may-defs', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(
|
|
`class C { void m(int a) { int x = 0; int y = a > 0 ? (x = 1) : (x = 2); use(y); } }`,
|
|
);
|
|
const x = bindingIdx(cfg, 'x');
|
|
expect(hasMayDef(cfg, x)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('compound assignment reads AND writes the lvalue', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m() { int z = 1; z += 3; } }`);
|
|
const z = bindingIdx(cfg, 'z');
|
|
expect(hasDef(cfg, z)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(hasUse(cfg, z)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('field/array writes are NOT scalar defs (their roots are uses)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void m(int[] a) { a[0] = 1; this.f = 2; } }`);
|
|
// `a` is a parameter; the array write `a[0] = 1` reads a (subscript root),
|
|
// it does not define `a`. No `this.f` scalar binding is created.
|
|
const a = bindingIdx(cfg, 'a');
|
|
expect(hasUse(cfg, a)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Java CfgVisitor — functionStartColumn', () => {
|
|
it('two same-line methods get distinct functionStartColumn', () => {
|
|
const cfgs = java.cfgsOf(`class C { int a() { return 1; } int b() { return 2; } }`);
|
|
expect(cfgs).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(cfgs[0].functionStartLine).toBe(cfgs[1].functionStartLine); // same line
|
|
expect(cfgs[0].functionStartColumn).not.toBe(cfgs[1].functionStartColumn); // distinct column
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Java CfgVisitor — does not throw on exotic shapes', () => {
|
|
it('nested lambdas / anonymous-class methods each build their own CFGs', () => {
|
|
const warn = vi.spyOn(console, 'warn').mockImplementation(() => {});
|
|
try {
|
|
const cfgs = java.cfgsOf(`class C { void m() {
|
|
Runnable r = () -> { if (cond()) { go(); } };
|
|
java.util.function.Function<Integer,Integer> f = z -> z + 1;
|
|
r.run();
|
|
} }`);
|
|
expect(cfgs.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(3); // m, lambda block, lambda expr
|
|
for (const cfg of cfgs) expect(reaches(cfg, cfg.entryIndex, cfg.exitIndex)).toBe(true);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
warn.mockRestore();
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a truncated value-position switch never throws out of the carrier path (R4) (#2211)', () => {
|
|
const warn = vi.spyOn(console, 'warn').mockImplementation(() => {});
|
|
try {
|
|
const root = java.parse(`class C { int m(int k){ int x = switch (k) { case 1 -> a(`);
|
|
for (const fn of java.collectFunctions(root)) {
|
|
expect(() => createJavaCfgVisitor().buildFunctionCfg(fn, 'f.java')).not.toThrow();
|
|
}
|
|
} finally {
|
|
warn.mockRestore();
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// U6 — call-site `sites[]` taint substrate. INERT BY DESIGN: no Java taint model
|
|
// is registered, so these sites produce zero TAINTED edges; they only give the
|
|
// deferred per-language source/sink model something to match against.
|
|
describe('Java CfgVisitor — call-site sites[] substrate', () => {
|
|
const cfgOf = (body: string): FunctionCfg =>
|
|
java.cfgOf(`class C { void f(int cmd, int x, int a) { ${body} } }`);
|
|
|
|
it('a bare method call records a `call` site with callee + arg occurrence', () => {
|
|
const cfg = cfgOf(`exec(cmd);`);
|
|
const site = allSites(cfg).find((s) => s.kind === 'call' && s.callee === 'exec');
|
|
expect(site).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(site?.args?.[0]).toContainEqual(bindingIdx(cfg, 'cmd'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a receiver call (`db.query(x)`) records the receiver binding + dotted callee', () => {
|
|
// Java carries the method NAME on the `name` field and the receiver on the
|
|
// sibling `object` field — the substrate normalizes both to receiver+callee.
|
|
const cfg = cfgOf(`db.query(x);`);
|
|
const site = allSites(cfg).find((s) => s.kind === 'call' && s.callee === 'db.query');
|
|
expect(site).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(site?.receiver).toBe(bindingIdx(cfg, 'db'));
|
|
expect(site?.args?.[0]).toContainEqual(bindingIdx(cfg, 'x'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('`new Foo(x)` records a `new` site with the type as callee', () => {
|
|
const cfg = cfgOf(`Object p = new Foo(x);`);
|
|
const site = allSites(cfg).find((s) => s.kind === 'new');
|
|
expect(site?.callee).toBe('Foo');
|
|
expect(site?.args?.[0]).toContainEqual(bindingIdx(cfg, 'x'));
|
|
expect(site?.resultDefs).toContain(bindingIdx(cfg, 'p'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a nested call via-tags the inner site (sanitizer substrate)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = cfgOf(`exec(escape(x));`);
|
|
const sites = allSites(cfg);
|
|
const exec = sites.findIndex((s) => s.callee === 'exec');
|
|
const escape = sites.findIndex((s) => s.callee === 'escape');
|
|
expect(exec).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
|
|
expect(escape).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
|
|
const x = bindingIdx(cfg, 'x');
|
|
expect(sites[escape].args?.[0]).toContainEqual(x);
|
|
expect(sites[exec].args?.[0]).toContainEqual([x, escape]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('a CFG-only function (no calls) emits NO sites key (omit-when-empty)', () => {
|
|
const cfg = java.cfgOf(`class C { void f(int a, int b) { int x = a + b; } }`);
|
|
expect(hasAnySites(cfg)).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|