mirror of
https://github.com/abhigyanpatwari/GitNexus.git
synced 2026-08-28 05:25:25 +00:00
fd1e0a999c
* feat(ci): review agent on Sonnet 5 with structured, linked reviews Bump the pinned review model from claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929 to claude-sonnet-5 (verified against the pinned Claude Code 2.1.214 with subscription auth and --json-schema structured output). Restructure the published review body: verdict-first summary, findings ordered by severity, fixed section order, and every file or symbol reference as a GitHub permalink pinned to the analyzed head SHA (or the merge-base SHA for deleted and rename-old paths) instead of bare path:line text, so references are clickable and render inline previews. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * feat(ci): review agent runs as a coordinated reviewer swarm Implement the review skill's expert-lens section in CI: the main agent spawns four trusted lanes in parallel via the Task tool — correctness, security, blast-radius, and coverage — each a purpose-built persona restricted to Read/Glob/Grep plus the read-only graph MCP tools. Personas live in the canonical skill tree (mirrored to all shipped copies) and are installed into the reviewer's user-scope agents dir from the exact control SHA, so a hostile PR head can never define a lane. Lane reports are treated as unverified claims: the main agent re-anchors findings before publishing, and the publisher's context-evidence gate still requires the main conversation's own successful context call. Bash and the newer Agent tool remain disallowed for every context; the analyze timeout gets swarm headroom (45 -> 60 minutes). The workflow contract test now pins the swarm posture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * fix(ci): sidechain tool calls can no longer satisfy the evidence gate The review agent's own review of this PR found that proveGraphReview() walked the flat transcript without reading parent_tool_use_id, so a spawned lane's context call could satisfy the publisher's graph-evidence gate the prompt reserves for the orchestrator. Entries with a non-null parent_tool_use_id are still strictly validated (malformed linkage fails the transcript) but are excluded from both candidate context calls and qualifying results; a new fixture proves sidechain-only evidence is rejected while mainline evidence beside sidechain turns still passes. Also gives the orchestrator turn headroom for the four dispatched lanes (--max-turns 100 -> 150), addressing the review's LOW finding. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * refactor(skills): swarm-lane dispatch belongs to the review skill Move the lane orchestration out of the workflow prompt and into the gitnexus-review skill itself: a new "Swarm lanes" section names the four ci-persona lanes, defines when and how to dispatch them (parallel, one message, per-lane context and file slices), and owns the verification contract (lane reports are unverified claims; re-anchor, dedup, drop unanchored findings; lanes structure the work but never gate it). Any runner of the skill — the CI workflow or a local harness — now triggers the lanes from one canonical definition. The workflow prompt keeps only its CI-specific deltas: the lanes' trusted-control-SHA install provenance, the Task-tool dispatch surface, and the publisher's orchestrator-only context-evidence gate. Mirrors synced; 122 contract tests pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * feat(skills): add adversarial finder lane and critic gate to the swarm ci-adversarial-lens joins the parallel finder wave: it assumes the change is broken and constructs reachable failure scenarios — interleavings, hostile inputs, state corruption, abuse of newly exposed surfaces — each verified to a concrete entry point before it may be reported. ci-critic-lens runs last as a gate on the orchestrator's finished draft: it audits anchoring, concreteness, severity calibration, format conformance, and honesty, returning PASS or a numbered defect list with the smallest repair per item. The skill bounds it to two passes and the critic hardens the review without ever blocking it; the workflow inherits both lanes automatically through the wholesale ci-personas install. Mirrors synced across all three shipped trees; 122 contract tests pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * refactor(ci): workflow defers the whole swarm contract to the skill Now that the skill's Swarm lanes section owns dispatch, verification, the critic gate, and the fallbacks, the workflow prompt stops restating any of it. It contributes only what CI alone knows: the lanes' control-SHA install provenance, the concrete environment mapping for lane inputs (diff, manifest, head and merge-base checkouts, exact SHAs), and the one CI override — the publisher's context-evidence gate remains orchestrator-only. Analyze timeout gains headroom for the critic's sequential rounds (60 -> 75 minutes). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * fix(ci): dispatch swarm lanes via the Agent tool, not the renamed Task alias On the pinned Claude Code 2.1.214 the subagent-dispatch tool is `Agent` (`Task` was renamed to `Agent` in 2.1.63 and is now a legacy alias), and permission rules evaluate deny before allow. The workflow allowed `Task` and denied `Agent`, so the orchestrator could never dispatch a lane and every review silently fell back to the inline single-agent path while the text-only tests certified the broken config. Use `Agent` consistently: add it to --tools, allow it scoped to the six ci-personas (`Agent(ci-correctness-lens,...,ci-critic-lens)`), remove it from --disallowedTools, and update the prompt. Tests now match the scoped allowlist on the raw string (commas inside Agent(...) break a split) and assert Agent is no longer bare-denied. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * fix(ci): harden swarm permissions — allow Glob/Grep + merge-base reads, quarantine PR-head agents Three permission-hygiene gaps around the swarm dispatch: - Glob/Grep were in --tools but had no allow rule, so the lanes' declared tools could manufacture denied-tool errors; allow them (read-only, sandboxed by cwd + add-dir). - The prompt hands lanes the merge-base source checkout for deleted / rename-old symbols, but no Read rule covered it; add a scoped Read() allow (which grants access without triggering --add-dir agent discovery). - The --add-dir PR-head copy is scanned for spawnable agent definitions and the pinned runtime has no suppression env, so a PR could ship its own .claude/agents/*.md. Drop that subtree from the materialized copy after checkout-index (skills left intact), so only the trusted control-SHA personas can ever be dispatched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * test(ci): pin the Agent allowlist to the ci-personas; require a dispatch canary A text-only assertion cannot prove the pinned CLI actually dispatches the lanes (print mode silently ignores invalid settings and does not validate Agent(type) content at parse time) — that is what let the original Task/Agent inversion pass CI. Two mitigations for the class: - A cross-consistency test asserts the six names in the Agent(...) allowlist equal the six ci-personas filenames and each persona's frontmatter name, so a rename or typo in any of the three fails without auth. - The activation checklist now requires the post-merge canary to prove a positive dispatch AND an unlisted-type refusal before enabling the trigger. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * fix(ci): bound swarm transcript volume with per-persona maxTurns The six lanes stream into the single execution transcript the publisher validates, but the personas carried no turn budget, so a large-PR swarm run could overflow the (hard-throw) transcript caps and brick a valid review. Bound each lane deterministically — finders maxTurns 12, the critic maxTurns 6 — which keeps the worst case (~2×(150+5×12+2×6) ≈ 444 messages) under the unchanged 1_000 cap, so no cap needs raising. A new test encodes that invariant: it fails if a persona's maxTurns is bumped without revisiting the cap. Applied byte-identically across all four shipped skill trees. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * test(ci): independently pin both sidechain evidence-gate guards The sidechain-exclusion guards at candidate registration and result acceptance were mutually redundant on realistic transcripts (a real sidechain turn carries parent_tool_use_id on both its call and result), so deleting either guard alone still passed the whole suite. Add two asymmetric cross-wired fixtures — a mainline call with a sidechain result (pins the acceptance guard) and a sidechain call with a mainline result (pins the registration guard), both expecting missing_graph_evidence. Mutation-verified: deleting either guard alone now reddens the suite. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * docs(skills): require own evidence before dispatch; document critic fail-open and swarm naming Strengthen the gitnexus-review "Swarm lanes" contract (all four mirrors): - The orchestrator must make its own graph context call on a changed symbol before dispatching any lane, so a fully-delegated run cannot leave the publisher's evidence gate unsatisfied (mirrored into the workflow prompt, with a test pinning the ordering phrase). - Document that the critic's fail-open is deliberate (bounded to two passes, cannot deadlock, review still gated by evidence + schema), and distinguish it from the hard lane-7 gate in the separate gitnexus-pr-swarm-review skill. - Give a concrete local-harness registration pointer for ci-personas. - Add a reciprocal cross-reference in gitnexus-pr-swarm-review (single path — that skill is not part of the mirrored family). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * docs: record the review-agent swarm capability (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, reviewer-swarm README) Reflect the shipped swarm in the standing docs: bump AGENTS.md to 1.14.0 and CLAUDE.md to 1.8.0 with changelog rows, extend the gitnexus-review description to mention the ci-personas swarm lanes, and refresh the reviewer-swarm README so its differentiator names the real distinction (interactive on-demand swarm vs the CI review agent's in-workflow lanes) now that both run swarms. No CHANGELOG.md edit (feature-PR rule). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * fix(ci): close pre-push review findings on the swarm permission change Adversarial review of the fix diff caught two issues introduced by the permission-hygiene commit: - Bare Glob/Grep in --allowedTools are separate tools that the Read()-scoped path denies (/proc, github.workspace, ...) do not cover, opening an undenied read path to the raw checkouts and host paths via a prompt- injected lane. Drop the bare allow — under dontAsk they stay denied by omission; lanes read via the scoped Read() rules and the graph MCP. - The agents quarantine removed only the add-dir root's .claude/agents; make it recursive so a nested (e.g. monorepo subpackage) .claude/agents cannot survive and be discovered. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ * feat(ci): post an "in progress" marker while the review swarm runs Swarm reviews can take up to 75 minutes, and until now the PR showed no sign a review was running. Add a dedicated write-scoped `acknowledge` job that, under the same authorization gate as analyze, upserts a per-PR "🔄 GitNexus review in progress" sticky comment linking to the live run (and reacts 👀 to the trigger comment); the publisher removes that marker when the review — or a clean failure — posts. The marker lives in its own job so the model-facing analyze job stays secretless and read-only: it cannot post to the PR, so per-lane live progress isn't exposed there — the marker is a binary "running" state with a link to the Actions run where lane-by-lane progress is visible. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Va5uu9Ar3e45QZ5xFsG4AZ --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| gitnexus-debugging | ||
| gitnexus-exploring | ||
| gitnexus-impact-analysis | ||
| gitnexus-refactoring | ||
| gitnexus-review | ||