# GitNexus SWE-bench Evaluation Harness Evaluate whether GitNexus code intelligence improves AI agent performance on real software engineering tasks. Runs SWE-bench instances across multiple models and compares baseline (no graph) vs GitNexus-enhanced configurations. ## What This Tests **Hypothesis**: Giving AI agents structural code intelligence (call graphs, execution flows, blast radius analysis) improves their ability to resolve real GitHub issues — measured by resolve rate, cost, and efficiency. **Evaluation modes:** | Mode | What the agent gets | |------|-------------------| | `baseline` | Standard bash tools (grep, find, cat, sed) — control group | | `native` | Baseline + explicit GitNexus tools via eval-server (~100ms) | | `native_augment` | Native tools + grep results automatically enriched with graph context (**recommended**) | > **Recommended**: Use `native_augment` mode. It mirrors the Claude Code model — the agent gets both explicit GitNexus tools (fast bash commands) AND automatic enrichment of grep results with callers, callees, and execution flows. The agent decides when to use explicit tools vs rely on enriched search output. **Models supported** (see `configs/models/` for the current list): - Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Opus 4 - MiniMax M1 2.5, MiniMax M2.5 - GLM 4.7, GLM 5 - DeepSeek - Any model supported by litellm (add a YAML config) ## Prerequisites - Python 3.11+ - Docker (for SWE-bench containers) - Node.js 22+ (for GitNexus) - API keys for your chosen models ## Setup ```bash cd eval # Install dependencies pip install -e . # Set up API keys — copy the template and fill in your keys cp .env.example .env # Then edit .env and paste your key(s) ``` All models are routed through **OpenRouter** by default, so a single `OPENROUTER_API_KEY` is all you need. To use provider APIs directly (Anthropic, ZhipuAI, etc.), edit the model YAML in `configs/models/` and set the corresponding key in `.env`. ```bash # Pull SWE-bench Docker images (pulled on-demand, but you can pre-pull) docker pull swebench/sweb.eval.x86_64.django_1776_django-16527:latest ``` ### Debug logging Set `GITNEXUS_EVAL_DEBUG=1` to include full Python tracebacks in run summaries and logs. By default, errors are sanitized to avoid leaking host paths or stack traces. ## Quick Start ### Debug a single instance ```bash # Fastest way to verify everything works python run_eval.py debug -m claude-haiku -i django__django-16527 --subset lite ``` ### Run a single configuration ```bash # 5 instances, Claude Sonnet, native_augment mode (default) python run_eval.py single -m claude-sonnet --subset lite --slice 0:5 # Baseline comparison (no GitNexus) python run_eval.py single -m claude-sonnet --mode baseline --subset lite --slice 0:5 # Full Lite benchmark, 4 parallel workers python run_eval.py single -m claude-sonnet --subset lite -w 4 ``` ### Run the full matrix ```bash # All models x all modes python run_eval.py matrix --subset lite -w 4 # Key comparison: baseline vs native_augment python run_eval.py matrix -m claude-sonnet -m claude-haiku --modes baseline --modes native_augment --subset lite --slice 0:50 ``` ### Analyze results ```bash # Summary table python -m analysis.analyze_results results/ # Compare modes for a specific model python -m analysis.analyze_results compare-modes results/ -m claude-sonnet # GitNexus tool usage analysis python -m analysis.analyze_results gitnexus-usage results/ # Export as CSV for further analysis python -m analysis.analyze_results summary results/ --format csv > results.csv # Run official SWE-bench test evaluation python -m analysis.analyze_results summary results/ --swebench-eval ``` ### List available configurations ```bash python run_eval.py list-configs ``` ## Architecture ``` eval/ run_eval.py # Main entry point (single, matrix, debug commands) agents/ gitnexus_agent.py # GitNexusAgent: extends DefaultAgent with augmentation + metrics environments/ gitnexus_docker.py # Docker env with GitNexus + eval-server + standalone tool scripts bridge/ gitnexus_tools.sh # Bash wrappers (legacy — now standalone scripts are installed directly) mcp_bridge.py # Legacy MCP bridge (kept for reference) prompts/ system_baseline.jinja # System: persona + format rules instance_baseline.jinja # Instance: task + workflow system_native.jinja # System: + GitNexus tool reference instance_native.jinja # Instance: + GitNexus debugging workflow system_native_augment.jinja # System: + GitNexus tools + grep enrichment docs instance_native_augment.jinja # Instance: + GitNexus workflow + risk assessment configs/ models/ # Per-model YAML configs modes/ # Per-mode YAML configs (baseline, native, native_augment) analysis/ analyze_results.py # Post-run comparative analysis results/ # Output directory (gitignored) ``` ## How It Works ### Template structure mini-swe-agent requires two Jinja templates: - **system_template** → system message: persona, format rules, tool reference (static) - **instance_template** → first user message: task, workflow, rules, examples (contains `{{task}}`) Each mode has a `system_{mode}.jinja` + `instance_{mode}.jinja` pair. The agent loads both automatically based on the configured mode. ### Per-instance flow 1. Docker container starts with SWE-bench instance (repo at specific commit) 2. **GitNexus setup**: Node.js + gitnexus installed, `gitnexus analyze` runs (or restores from cache) 3. **Eval-server starts**: `gitnexus eval-server` daemon (persistent HTTP server, keeps LadybugDB warm) 4. **Standalone tool scripts installed** in `/usr/local/bin/` — works with `subprocess.run` (no `.bashrc` needed) 5. Agent runs with the configured model + system prompt + GitNexus tools 6. Agent's patch is extracted as a git diff 7. Metrics collected: cost, tokens, tool calls, GitNexus usage, augmentation stats ### Tool architecture ``` Agent → bash command → /usr/local/bin/gitnexus-query → curl http://127.0.0.1:4848/tool/query (fast path: eval-server, ~100ms) → npx gitnexus query (fallback: cold CLI, ~5-10s) ``` Each tool script in `/usr/local/bin/` is standalone — no sourcing, no env inheritance needed. This is critical because mini-swe-agent runs every command via `subprocess.run` in a fresh subshell. ### Eval-server The eval-server is a lightweight HTTP daemon that: - Keeps LadybugDB warm in memory (no cold start per tool call) - Returns LLM-friendly text (not raw JSON — saves tokens) - Includes next-step hints to guide tool chaining (query → context → impact → fix) - Auto-shuts down after idle timeout **CLI flags:** | Flag | Default | Purpose | |------|---------|---------| | `--port ` | `4848` | Port to listen on | | `--host ` | `127.0.0.1` | Bind address — use `0.0.0.0` for cross-container access | | `--idle-timeout ` | `0` (disabled) | Auto-shutdown after N seconds of inactivity | **READY signal:** When the server is ready, it writes to stdout: ``` # IPv4 GITNEXUS_EVAL_SERVER_READY:127.0.0.1:4848 # IPv6 (bracketed to avoid colon ambiguity) GITNEXUS_EVAL_SERVER_READY:[::1]:4848 ``` Parse the port as the last colon-segment (`split(':').pop()`) — not `split(':')[1]`, which breaks for IPv6 and for non-loopback IPv4 hosts added in this release. ### Custom port and host `run_eval.py` does not expose `--port` or `--host` as CLI flags. Configure them in your mode YAML under the `environment:` key: ```yaml # configs/modes/native_augment.yaml (or whichever mode you're running) environment: eval_server_port: 4849 # change if 4848 is already in use on the host eval_server_host: "0.0.0.0" # bind all interfaces — needed for cross-container setups ``` Defaults are `port: 4848` and `host: 127.0.0.1` (loopback only). Use `0.0.0.0` only when the agent container needs to reach the eval-server from a separate network namespace. The health probe and tool scripts connect via the configured bind host (defaulting to `127.0.0.1`), which is reachable for both loopback and all-interface binds. `"localhost"` is also a valid `eval_server_host` value. The OS resolves it at bind time — typically `127.0.0.1` on dual-stack or IPv4-only systems, and `::1` on IPv6-only systems. The exact result depends on your `/etc/hosts` and `gai.conf`. The READY signal will reflect the actual bound address (e.g. `GITNEXUS_EVAL_SERVER_READY:127.0.0.1:4848` or `GITNEXUS_EVAL_SERVER_READY:[::1]:4848`), not the literal string `localhost`. Use this when you want the server to bind to whichever loopback address the OS prefers rather than forcing IPv4. **Running eval-server directly in Docker / Docker Compose:** ```bash # Bind to all interfaces so sibling containers can reach it gitnexus eval-server --host 0.0.0.0 --port 4848 # Then probe from a sibling container via its service hostname curl http://eval-container:4848/health ``` If you need a non-default port (e.g. to avoid conflicts), pass `--port ` alongside `--host`. The READY signal will reflect both: ``` GITNEXUS_EVAL_SERVER_READY:0.0.0.0:5000 ``` Parse the port as the last colon-segment (`split(':').pop()`) — safe for both IPv4 and bracketed IPv6 forms. ### Index caching SWE-bench repos repeat (Django has 200+ instances at different commits). The harness caches GitNexus indexes per `(repo, commit)` hash in `~/.gitnexus-eval-cache/` to avoid redundant re-indexing. ### Grep augmentation (native_augment mode) When the agent runs `grep` or `rg`, the observation is post-processed: the agent class calls `gitnexus-augment` on the search pattern and appends `[GitNexus]` annotations showing callers, callees, and execution flows for matched symbols. This mirrors the Claude Code / Cursor hook integration. ## Adding Models Create a YAML file in `configs/models/`: ```yaml # configs/models/my-model.yaml model: model_name: "openrouter/provider/model-name" cost_tracking: "ignore_errors" # if not in litellm's cost DB model_kwargs: max_tokens: 8192 temperature: 0 ``` The model name follows [litellm conventions](https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/providers). ## Metrics Collected | Metric | Description | |--------|-------------| | Patch Rate | % of instances where agent produced a patch | | Resolve Rate | % of instances where patch passes tests (requires --swebench-eval) | | Total Cost | API cost across all instances | | Avg Cost/Instance | Cost efficiency | | API Calls | Number of LLM calls | | GN Tool Calls | How many GitNexus tools the agent used | | Augment Hits | How many grep/find results got enriched | | Augment Hit Rate | % of search commands that got useful enrichment |