/** * Integration test: impact() ambiguous-resolution blast radius (#2129) * * Reproduces the issue's graph shape: a small helper name (`classifyCard`) * exists in two files. The "real" one is called by `syncContent` (+ another * caller); a coincidental same-name helper elsewhere is called by `renderCard`. * * Before fix: impact("classifyCard", upstream) resolves the ambiguous bare name * to `impactedCount: 0` with a flat candidate list — the real caller * (`syncContent`) is silently dropped because it calls the *other* same-name * node. After fix: the ambiguous response runs a bounded summary-only BFS per * candidate, surfacing each one's true count + the maximum, so no real caller * hides behind a bare zero. The BFS / edge storage are unchanged — disambiguation * by uid still returns the exact caller. */ import { it, expect, beforeAll, vi } from 'vitest'; import { LocalBackend } from '../../src/mcp/local/local-backend.js'; import { listRegisteredRepos } from '../../src/storage/repo-manager.js'; import { withTestLbugDB } from '../helpers/test-indexed-db.js'; vi.mock('../../src/storage/repo-manager.js', () => ({ listRegisteredRepos: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]), cleanupOldKuzuFiles: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ found: false, needsReindex: false }), findSiblingClones: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]), })); const SYNC_LOGIC_ID = 'Function:src/sync-logic.ts:classifyCard'; const UI_HELPERS_ID = 'Function:src/ui-helpers.ts:classifyCard'; const SEED = [ // Two distinct functions named `classifyCard` in different files. `CREATE (cc1:Function {id: '${SYNC_LOGIC_ID}', name: 'classifyCard', filePath: 'src/sync-logic.ts', startLine: 1, endLine: 3, isExported: true, content: '', description: ''})`, `CREATE (cc2:Function {id: '${UI_HELPERS_ID}', name: 'classifyCard', filePath: 'src/ui-helpers.ts', startLine: 1, endLine: 3, isExported: true, content: '', description: ''})`, // Real callers of the sync-logic classifyCard (the blast radius that was lost). `CREATE (sc:Function {id: 'Function:src/actions.ts:syncContent', name: 'syncContent', filePath: 'src/actions.ts', startLine: 10, endLine: 120, isExported: true, content: '', description: ''})`, `CREATE (ss:Function {id: 'Function:src/actions.ts:scheduleSync', name: 'scheduleSync', filePath: 'src/actions.ts', startLine: 130, endLine: 160, isExported: true, content: '', description: ''})`, // Caller of the coincidental ui-helpers classifyCard. `CREATE (rc:Function {id: 'Function:src/ui-helpers.ts:renderCard', name: 'renderCard', filePath: 'src/ui-helpers.ts', startLine: 20, endLine: 40, isExported: true, content: '', description: ''})`, `MATCH (a:Function {id:'Function:src/actions.ts:syncContent'}), (b:Function {id:'${SYNC_LOGIC_ID}'}) CREATE (a)-[:CodeRelation {type:'CALLS', confidence:0.85, reason:'direct', step:0}]->(b)`, `MATCH (a:Function {id:'Function:src/actions.ts:scheduleSync'}), (b:Function {id:'${SYNC_LOGIC_ID}'}) CREATE (a)-[:CodeRelation {type:'CALLS', confidence:0.85, reason:'direct', step:0}]->(b)`, `MATCH (a:Function {id:'Function:src/ui-helpers.ts:renderCard'}), (b:Function {id:'${UI_HELPERS_ID}'}) CREATE (a)-[:CodeRelation {type:'CALLS', confidence:0.85, reason:'direct', step:0}]->(b)`, // Two same-named non-callable consts — an ambiguity that survives the #2687 // twin fix, used to pin that a value candidate reports a real `kind`. `CREATE (k1:Const {id: 'Const:src/config-a.ts:APP_CONFIG', name: 'APP_CONFIG', filePath: 'src/config-a.ts', startLine: 1, endLine: 1, content: '', description: ''})`, `CREATE (k2:Const {id: 'Const:src/config-b.ts:APP_CONFIG', name: 'APP_CONFIG', filePath: 'src/config-b.ts', startLine: 1, endLine: 1, content: '', description: ''})`, // A class and a same-named value binding in another file — the #480 // Class/Constructor collapse must still fold onto the Class. Before the // enrichment widening these value candidates carried `type: ''`, which is // what kept the collapse gate open. `CREATE (rc:Class {id: 'Class:src/registry.ts:Registry', name: 'Registry', filePath: 'src/registry.ts', startLine: 1, endLine: 9, isExported: true, content: '', description: ''})`, `CREATE (rv:Const {id: 'Const:test/registry.test.ts:Registry', name: 'Registry', filePath: 'test/registry.test.ts', startLine: 3, endLine: 3, content: '', description: ''})`, `CREATE (ru:Function {id: 'Function:src/boot.ts:boot', name: 'boot', filePath: 'src/boot.ts', startLine: 1, endLine: 5, isExported: true, content: '', description: ''})`, `MATCH (a:Function {id:'Function:src/boot.ts:boot'}), (b:Class {id:'Class:src/registry.ts:Registry'}) CREATE (a)-[:CodeRelation {type:'CALLS', confidence:0.85, reason:'direct', step:0}]->(b)`, // #2787 review F4 — the two shapes the Class/Interface collapse must now tell // apart. `Panel`: ONE Class plus its Constructor (the literal #480 case) — // exactly one candidate carries the label, so collapsing is a correct // confident answer. `Widget`: TWO Classes in different files plus a same-named // value binding — more than one candidate carries the label, so there is no // right answer to pick and the caller must be told. `CREATE (:Class {id: 'Class:src/panel.ts:Panel', name: 'Panel', filePath: 'src/panel.ts', startLine: 1, endLine: 12, isExported: true, content: '', description: ''})`, `CREATE (:Constructor {id: 'Constructor:src/panel.ts:Panel', name: 'Panel', filePath: 'src/panel.ts', startLine: 2, endLine: 4, content: '', description: ''})`, `CREATE (:Class {id: 'Class:src/widgets/alpha.ts:Widget', name: 'Widget', filePath: 'src/widgets/alpha.ts', startLine: 1, endLine: 20, isExported: true, content: '', description: ''})`, `CREATE (:Class {id: 'Class:src/widgets/beta.ts:Widget', name: 'Widget', filePath: 'src/widgets/beta.ts', startLine: 1, endLine: 20, isExported: true, content: '', description: ''})`, `CREATE (:Const {id: 'Const:test/widget.test.ts:Widget', name: 'Widget', filePath: 'test/widget.test.ts', startLine: 3, endLine: 3, content: '', description: ''})`, ]; withTestLbugDB( 'impact-ambiguous-blast-radius', (handle) => { let backend: LocalBackend; beforeAll(() => { backend = (handle as any)._backend; }); it('surfaces per-candidate blast radius instead of a bare impactedCount:0', async () => { const result = await backend.callTool('impact', { target: 'classifyCard', direction: 'upstream', }); expect(result.status).toBe('ambiguous'); expect(Array.isArray(result.candidates)).toBe(true); expect(result.candidates).toHaveLength(2); // The fix: the maximum real blast radius is hoisted to the top level so // the response can never be misread as "safe to refactor". expect(result.maxImpactedCount).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2); // Each candidate carries its own true count — the dropped caller is no // longer hidden behind the ambiguous zero. const syncLogic = result.candidates.find((c: any) => String(c.filePath).includes('sync-logic'), ); const uiHelpers = result.candidates.find((c: any) => String(c.filePath).includes('ui-helpers'), ); expect(syncLogic).toBeDefined(); expect(uiHelpers).toBeDefined(); expect(syncLogic.impactedCount).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2); expect(uiHelpers.impactedCount).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1); // Candidates are ranked by blast radius (most-impactful interpretation // first) so the dangerous one leads. expect(result.candidates[0].impactedCount).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual( result.candidates[1].impactedCount, ); }); it('reports an undetermined impactedCount, never a numeric zero (#2687)', async () => { const result = await backend.callTool('impact', { target: 'classifyCard', direction: 'upstream', }); // #2129 hoisted maxImpactedCount so a real caller could not hide behind // the ambiguous zero — but the zero itself was still byte-identical to a // genuine "nothing depends on this". A consumer testing // `impactedCount === 0` got a confident all-clear without ever reading // `candidates[]`. `null` is undetermined and cannot be misread that way. expect(result).toMatchObject({ status: 'ambiguous', impactedCount: null, risk: 'UNKNOWN' }); expect(typeof result.impactedCount).not.toBe('number'); // The truthful signal is still present and still non-zero. expect(result.maxImpactedCount).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2); }); it('reports a real kind for an ambiguous value candidate (#2687)', async () => { // `labels(n)[0]` comes back empty for these node types, and the label // enrichment UNION used to cover only Class/Interface/Function/Method/ // Constructor — so a value candidate surfaced as `kind: ""`, which reads // as "unknown kind" and leaves the `kind` disambiguation hint unable to // filter it out. const result = await backend.callTool('impact', { target: 'APP_CONFIG', direction: 'upstream', }); expect(result.status).toBe('ambiguous'); expect(result.candidates.map((c: { kind: string }) => c.kind)).toEqual(['Const', 'Const']); }); it('still collapses a Class against a same-named value binding (#480)', async () => { // Regression guard for the enrichment widening: the collapse gate keys on // "some candidate has an indeterminate kind". Value candidates used to // qualify by carrying `type: ''`; now that enrichment fills them in they // must be named explicitly, or this resolves to `ambiguous` and every // resolver-backed tool loses a previously confident answer. const result = await backend.callTool('impact', { target: 'Registry', direction: 'upstream', }); expect(result.status).not.toBe('ambiguous'); expect(result.target).toMatchObject({ id: 'Class:src/registry.ts:Registry', type: 'Class', }); expect(result.impactedCount).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1); }); it('still collapses a lone Class against its same-named Constructor (#480, #2787 review F4)', async () => { // Non-regression half of the F4 fix. The collapse probe went from // `LIMIT 1` to `LIMIT 2` and now requires EXACTLY one row — one Class plus // one Constructor still yields exactly one Class row, so the confident // answer #480 introduced is unchanged. If this flips to `ambiguous`, the // uniqueness guard was made too strict and every resolver-backed tool // loses a previously confident resolution. const result = await backend.callTool('context', { name: 'Panel' }); expect(result).toMatchObject({ status: 'found' }); expect(result.symbol).toMatchObject({ uid: 'Class:src/panel.ts:Panel', kind: 'Class' }); }); it('refuses to collapse when TWO candidates carry the Class label (#2787 review F4)', async () => { // Collapsing returns `kind: 'ok'` — the caller never sees the scorer or // the ambiguity report — and it is the ONLY confident path a bare name can // take (scoreCandidate tops out at 0.60 without a file_path hint; the // confident gate needs >= 0.95). With `LIMIT 1` the probe took whichever // labelled row came back and answered confidently; adding `ORDER BY n.id` // made that wrong pick REPEATABLE rather than right — `context`/`impact` // would silently analyse src/widgets/alpha.ts and never mention beta. // `LIMIT 2` turns the second row into a uniqueness check. const result = await backend.callTool('context', { name: 'Widget' }); expect(result).toMatchObject({ status: 'ambiguous' }); expect((result.candidates as Array<{ uid: string }>).map((c) => c.uid).sort()).toEqual([ 'Class:src/widgets/alpha.ts:Widget', 'Class:src/widgets/beta.ts:Widget', 'Const:test/widget.test.ts:Widget', ]); // Both classes are offered, so the caller can disambiguate — the file the // old code silently discarded is the second entry above. expect(result.totalCandidates).toBe(3); }); it('reports an undetermined impactedCount for an ambiguous pdg target (#2687)', async () => { // The pdg branch has no per-candidate fan-out, so it carries no // maxImpactedCount at all — a numeric zero here is even less correctable. const result = await backend.callTool('impact', { target: 'classifyCard', direction: 'upstream', mode: 'pdg', }); expect(result).toMatchObject({ status: 'ambiguous', mode: 'pdg', impactedCount: null, risk: 'UNKNOWN', }); expect(typeof result.impactedCount).not.toBe('number'); }); it('disambiguation by uid returns the exact dropped caller (BFS unchanged)', async () => { const result = await backend.callTool('impact', { target: 'classifyCard', target_uid: SYNC_LOGIC_ID, direction: 'upstream', }); expect(result.status).not.toBe('ambiguous'); expect(result.impactedCount).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2); const names = Object.values(result.byDepth as Record) .flat() .map((d: any) => d.name); expect(names).toContain('syncContent'); expect(names).toContain('scheduleSync'); }); }, { seed: SEED, poolAdapter: true, afterSetup: async (handle) => { vi.mocked(listRegisteredRepos).mockResolvedValue([ { name: 'test-repo', path: '/test/repo', storagePath: handle.tmpHandle.dbPath, indexedAt: new Date().toISOString(), lastCommit: 'abc123', stats: { files: 5, nodes: 6, communities: 0, processes: 0 }, }, ]); const backend = new LocalBackend(); await backend.init(); (handle as any)._backend = backend; }, }, ); /** * #2787 — the resolver's LIMIT 20 window must be pinned by ORDER BY. * * 25 Functions share one name, seeded in DESCENDING id order. Without an * ORDER BY, LadybugDB hands back the first 20 it scans (insertion order on a * fixture this small, an arbitrary subset on a real index) — `collide-z25` * down to `collide-z06`. With `ORDER BY n.id` it returns the 20 lowest ids, * `collide-z01` through `collide-z20`. The two sets are disjoint on 10 * elements, so the exact-list assertion below distinguishes them. * * `context` is the observable surface, not `impact`: it returns every resolver * candidate untruncated, while `impact` slices to AMBIGUOUS_MAX_CANDIDATES and * re-sorts by blast radius, which would hide the window difference. */ const COLLIDE_COUNT = 25; const COLLIDE_IDS = Array.from( { length: COLLIDE_COUNT }, (_, i) => `Function:src/z${String(i + 1).padStart(2, '0')}.ts:collide`, ); withTestLbugDB( 'resolver-window-ordering-2787', (handle) => { let backend: LocalBackend; beforeAll(() => { backend = (handle as any)._backend; }); it('returns the 20 lowest-id candidates, not an arbitrary window (#2787)', async () => { const result = await backend.callTool('context', { name: 'collide' }); expect(result.status).toBe('ambiguous'); // 25 is the TRUE match count (a COUNT alongside the window); 20 is the // window. Reporting the window here claimed the cap was the total. expect(result).toMatchObject({ totalCandidates: COLLIDE_COUNT, candidatesTruncated: true }); expect(result.message).toContain(`Found ${COLLIDE_COUNT} symbols`); expect(result.message).toContain('showing 20'); expect((result.candidates as Array<{ uid: string }>).map((c) => c.uid)).toEqual( COLLIDE_IDS.slice(0, 20), ); }); }, { // Descending: the highest id is inserted first, so an unordered scan that // follows insertion order returns exactly the wrong half. seed: [...COLLIDE_IDS] .reverse() .map( (id, i) => `CREATE (:Function {id: '${id}', name: 'collide', filePath: 'src/z${String(COLLIDE_COUNT - i).padStart(2, '0')}.ts', startLine: 1, endLine: 3, isExported: true, content: '', description: ''})`, ), poolAdapter: true, afterSetup: async (handle) => { vi.mocked(listRegisteredRepos).mockResolvedValue([ { name: 'test-repo', path: '/test/repo', storagePath: handle.tmpHandle.dbPath, indexedAt: new Date().toISOString(), lastCommit: 'abc123', stats: { files: COLLIDE_COUNT, nodes: COLLIDE_COUNT, communities: 0, processes: 0 }, }, ]); const backend = new LocalBackend(); await backend.init(); (handle as any)._backend = backend; }, }, );