{ "fingerprint": "4ee15e742a9839671a900df4f57c1c91196c64256c8cab2ac445bec605a092d5", "scaling_budget": 1.8, "max_ms_large": 1000, "_rebaselined_2856_property_is_detail": "Third and last of the bench guards this branch left red. The Property node table gained an `isDetail` BOOLEAN column (see PROPERTY_SCHEMA in src/core/lbug/schema.ts), so `streamAllCSVsToDisk` writes one more header field and one more cell per Property row — csv-generator.ts `propertyHeader` and the `node.label === 'Property'` tail. Verified to be header-only drift rather than a change in what is emitted: dumping every CSV this bench produces on `origin/main` and on this branch and diffing per-file (filename, byte length, sha256) shows the file SET is identical at 35 CSVs on both sides, 34 of the 35 are byte-identical, and the sole difference is `property.csv` growing 68 -> 77 bytes, `id,name,filePath,startLine,endLine,content,description,declaredType` -> `...,declaredType,isDetail`. The synthetic graph has no Property nodes, so no ROW moved at all. That is the check that matters here: a row routed to the wrong pair file, or a within-file reordering, is what this fingerprint exists to catch, and neither happened. Prior 69e9182ae205183ade24c3d8ad5d7292aea677144b1cbe443dd631bc25b0cafe -> 4ee15e742a9839671a900df4f57c1c91196c64256c8cab2ac445bec605a092d5. Both timing gates passed unchanged while this was red (scaling_ratio 0.783 vs budget 1.8, elapsed_ms_large 229ms vs the 1000ms backstop), so no throughput claim is being rebaselined away.", "_note": "fingerprint = sha256 over per-file digests (filename + sha256(file bytes)), entry list sorted — binds each emitted line to its file so a row routed to the WRONG pair file changes the hash, AND catches within-file row reordering (file bytes hashed as-written). Byte-identity gate for #2203 U2/U3. NOTE: a future change that legitimately reorders emit (without changing the node/edge SET) will trip --check; regenerate then, and record WHY in a `_rebaselined_` key alongside — bench/scope-capture/baselines.json sets that convention and it is what makes a regenerated hash reviewable. scaling_budget bounds (t_large/t_small)/(LARGE/SMALL): observed ~0.95-1.05 (linear); 1.8 tolerates disk-I/O timing noise on CI while still catching an O(n^2) re-regression (~4x). max_ms_large=1000ms is a coarse absolute backstop (observed ~200ms) that catches a gross uniform slowdown the ratio gate misses; generous so CI host noise won't flake it. Regenerate via `node --import tsx bench/emit-persistence/measure.mjs`." }