fix nested Ruby factory ownership

gitnexus/src/core/ingestion/class-extractors/configs/ruby.ts

@@ -46,10 +46,14 @@ export const rubyFactoryBindingName = (node: SyntaxNode): string | undefined =>
 export const rubyClassConfig: ClassExtractionConfig = {
   language: SupportedLanguages.Ruby,
   typeDeclarationNodes: ['class', 'do_block', 'block'],
-  ancestorScopeNodeTypes: ['module', 'class'],
+  ancestorScopeNodeTypes: ['module', 'class', 'do_block', 'block'],
   // #1978: key nested-type nodes by their fully-qualified path (Outer.Inner) so
   // same-tail classes nested under different modules stay distinct.
   qualifiedNodeId: true,
+  extractScopeSegments: (node) => {
+    const factoryName = rubyFactoryBindingName(node);
+    return factoryName ? [factoryName] : undefined;
+  },
   extractName: (node) => rubyFactoryBindingName(node),
   extractType: (node) => {
     const type = rubyFactoryType(node);

gitnexus/src/core/ingestion/languages/ruby.ts

@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ const BUILT_INS: ReadonlySet<string> = new Set([
  * All other container types are returned as-is.
  */
 const rubyResolveEnclosingOwner = (node: SyntaxNode): SyntaxNode | null => {
-  if (node.type === 'do_block') {
+  if (node.type === 'do_block' || node.type === 'block') {
     return rubyFactoryType(node) === undefined ? null : node;
   }
   if (node.type === 'singleton_class') {

gitnexus/test/integration/ruby-factory-block-owner.test.ts

@@ -46,6 +46,18 @@ class Outer
       def nested_class_method = 1
     end
   end
+
+  First = Class.new do
+    Item = Class.new do
+      def first_item_method = 1
+    end
+  end
+
+  Second = Class.new do
+    Item = Class.new do
+      def second_item_method = 1
+    end
+  end
 end
 `,
     });
@@ -105,4 +117,24 @@ end
     expect(nestedOwner).toBeDefined();
     expect(ownership.map((edge) => edge.rel.sourceId)).toEqual([nestedOwner?.id]);
   });
+
+  it('keeps same-tail factories distinct when nested inside factory blocks', () => {
+    const owners = result.graph.nodes.filter(
+      (node) => node.label === 'Class' && node.properties.name === 'Item',
+    );
+    const firstOwner = owners.find((node) => node.id.includes('Outer.First.Item'));
+    const secondOwner = owners.find((node) => node.id.includes('Outer.Second.Item'));
+    const firstOwnership = getRelationships(result, 'HAS_METHOD').filter(
+      (edge) => edge.target === 'first_item_method',
+    );
+    const secondOwnership = getRelationships(result, 'HAS_METHOD').filter(
+      (edge) => edge.target === 'second_item_method',
+    );
+
+    expect(owners).toHaveLength(2);
+    expect(firstOwner).toBeDefined();
+    expect(secondOwner).toBeDefined();
+    expect(firstOwnership.map((edge) => edge.rel.sourceId)).toEqual([firstOwner?.id]);
+    expect(secondOwnership.map((edge) => edge.rel.sourceId)).toEqual([secondOwner?.id]);
+  });
 });